Department of Language and Literature,Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics,60322 Frankfurt am Main,
Department of Arts,Culture and Media,University of Groningen,9700 AB Groningen,The
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e380. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001947.
While covering all commentaries, our response specifically focuses on the following issues: How can the hypothesis of emotional distancing (qua art framing) be compatible with stipulating high levels of felt negative emotions in art reception? Which concept of altogether pleasurable mixed emotions does our model involve? Can mechanisms of predictive coding, social sharing, and immersion enhance the power of our model?
在涵盖所有评论的同时，我们的回应特别关注以下问题：情感距离假说（即艺术框架）如何与艺术接受中规定的高度负面情绪相一致？我们的模型涉及哪种完全愉悦的混合情绪概念？预测编码、社会分享和沉浸等机制能否增强我们模型的效力？
