• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文译文:中国多中心纵向研究:一种用于糖尿病患者的简易糖尿病足溃疡风险清单的制定与验证。

Development and validation of a brief diabetic foot ulceration risk checklist among diabetic patients: a multicenter longitudinal study in China.

机构信息

Department of Outpatient, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 17;8(1):962. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19268-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-19268-3
PMID:29343754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5772364/
Abstract

The study aims to develop and assess and validate a brief diabetic foot ulceration risk checklist among diabetic patients through a longitudinal study. Patients who had diabetes mellitus and had no foot ulceration and severe systematic disorders were recruited from eleven tertiary hospitals in nine provinces or municipalities of China. Internal consistency reliability, construct validity, concurrent validity, item property, and measurement invariance of the tool were assessed. The predictive capability of the tool was validated by the follow-up data using the receiver operating characteristic curve. At baseline, 477 valid cases were collected. Twelve items were remained after initial selection. Cronbach's alpha was 0.56. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model had acceptable goodness-of-fit yet local dependency between two items. Item response theory showed that most items had acceptable discrimination and difficulty parameters. Differential item functioning showed that tool had measurement invariance. 278 were followed up one year after the baseline. Follow-up showed that one-year incidence of ulceration among the patients was 3.6%, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.93). The cut-off point of the tool was 4, when sensitivity and specificity were 0.62 and 0.75 respectively. The checklist has good psychometric properties according to mixed evidences from classical and modern test theory, and has good predictive capability.

摘要

本研究旨在通过纵向研究开发并评估和验证一种用于糖尿病患者的简短糖尿病足溃疡风险清单。我们从中国九个省或直辖市的十一家三级医院招募了患有糖尿病且无足部溃疡和严重系统性疾病的患者。评估了工具的内部一致性信度、结构效度、同时效度、项目属性和测量不变性。使用接收器工作特征曲线通过随访数据验证了工具的预测能力。在基线时,共收集了 477 例有效病例。经过初步选择,保留了 12 个项目。克朗巴赫 α 系数为 0.56。验证性因子分析表明,该模型具有可接受的拟合优度,但两个项目之间存在局部依赖性。项目反应理论表明,大多数项目具有可接受的区分度和难度参数。差异项目功能显示工具具有测量不变性。在基线后一年对 278 例患者进行了随访。随访结果显示,患者的溃疡年发生率为 3.6%,接收器工作特征曲线下面积为 0.77(95%置信区间:0.61-0.93)。当工具的截断值为 4 时,敏感性和特异性分别为 0.62 和 0.75。根据经典和现代测试理论的混合证据,该清单具有良好的心理测量特性,具有良好的预测能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84e4/5772364/0adc50bd99ab/41598_2018_19268_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84e4/5772364/4c5a38168548/41598_2018_19268_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84e4/5772364/37143bc3d0ff/41598_2018_19268_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84e4/5772364/0adc50bd99ab/41598_2018_19268_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84e4/5772364/4c5a38168548/41598_2018_19268_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84e4/5772364/37143bc3d0ff/41598_2018_19268_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84e4/5772364/0adc50bd99ab/41598_2018_19268_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a brief diabetic foot ulceration risk checklist among diabetic patients: a multicenter longitudinal study in China.中文译文:中国多中心纵向研究:一种用于糖尿病患者的简易糖尿病足溃疡风险清单的制定与验证。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 17;8(1):962. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19268-3.
2
Development and validation of the 9-item Concise Mental Health Checklist (CMHC-9) for suicide risk assessment.简明心理健康检查表(CMHC-9)的编制与自杀风险评估的验证。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 Sep;118(9):1308-1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.05.025. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
3
The reliability and validity of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire'07 for children aged 4-6 years in mainland China.《发育性协调障碍问卷(2007版)》在中国大陆4至6岁儿童中的信效度研究
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Dec;47:405-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
4
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of brief diabetic foot ulceration risk checklist.土耳其语版简短糖尿病足溃疡风险检查表的有效性和可靠性。
North Clin Istanb. 2021 Mar 12;8(2):130-138. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.72558. eCollection 2021.
5
Development and validation of a brief diabetic foot risk screening scale for diabetic patients.糖尿病患者简易糖尿病足风险筛查量表的研制与验证
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Aug 5;7:100230. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100230. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Validation of the basic foot screening checklist: a population screening tool for identifying foot ulcer risk in people with diabetes mellitus.基本足部筛查检查表的验证:一种用于识别糖尿病患者足部溃疡风险的人群筛查工具。
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2009 Jul-Aug;99(4):339-47. doi: 10.7547/0980339.
7
[Development of risk assessment scales for Needed Support/Long-Term Care certification: A longitudinal study using the Kihon Checklist and medical assessment data].[所需支持/长期护理认证风险评估量表的开发:一项使用基洪检查表和医学评估数据的纵向研究]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2017;64(5):246-257. doi: 10.11236/jph.64.5_246.
8
Development, validation and psychometric analysis of the diabetic foot self-care questionnaire of the University of Malaga, Spain (DFSQ-UMA).西班牙马拉加大学糖尿病足自我护理问卷(DFSQ-UMA)的编制、验证及心理测量分析
J Tissue Viability. 2015 Feb;24(1):24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
9
Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale - Short Form (DFS-SF).糖尿病足溃疡量表简表(DFS-SF)希腊语版本的效度和信度。
Hormones (Athens). 2016 Jul;15(3):394-403. doi: 10.14310/horm.2002.1682.
10
Assessment of Reliability and Validity of SF-12v2 among a Diabetic Population.SF-12v2 在糖尿病患者中的可靠性和有效性评估。
Value Health. 2018 Apr;21(4):432-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Chloroquine inhibits salinomycin-induced autophagy for collaborative anticancer effect in breast cancer.氯喹抑制沙利霉素诱导的自噬以协同发挥乳腺癌抗癌作用。
Bioimpacts. 2025 May 25;15:30821. doi: 10.34172/bi.30821. eCollection 2025.
2
Diabetic foot in the context of rheumatic diseases: pathogenesis and treatment approaches.风湿性疾病背景下的糖尿病足:发病机制与治疗方法
Rheumatol Int. 2025 May 2;45(5):132. doi: 10.1007/s00296-025-05890-8.
3
Risk factors and a predictive model of diabetic foot in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevention and management of foot problems in diabetes: A Summary Guidance for Daily Practice 2015, based on the IWGDF guidance documents.糖尿病足部问题的预防与管理:基于国际糖尿病足工作组指导文件的2015年日常实践总结指南
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Feb;124:84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.12.007. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
2
Global epidemiology of diabetic foot ulceration: a systematic review and meta-analysis .糖尿病足溃疡的全球流行病学:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Ann Med. 2017 Mar;49(2):106-116. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1231932. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
3
Diabetic foot care in China: challenges and strategy.
2型糖尿病住院患者糖尿病足的危险因素及预测模型
World J Diabetes. 2025 Mar 15;16(3):95644. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i3.95644.
4
Screening tools for diabetic foot ulcers: a narrative review.糖尿病足溃疡的筛查工具:一项叙述性综述。
Hormones (Athens). 2025 Mar;24(1):71-83. doi: 10.1007/s42000-024-00598-z. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
5
Dang-Gui-Si-Ni decoction facilitates wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers by regulating expression of AGEs/RAGE/TGF-β/Smad2/3.当归四逆汤通过调节 AGEs/RAGE/TGF-β/Smad2/3 表达促进糖尿病足溃疡愈合。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Jun 7;316(7):338. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03021-0.
6
Diabetic foot ulcers risk prediction in patients with type 2 diabetes using classifier based on associations rule mining.基于关联规则挖掘的分类器在 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病足溃疡风险预测中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 5;14(1):635. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47576-w.
7
Physical activity, sleep disorders, and type of work in the prevention of cognitive function decline in patients with hypertension.体力活动、睡眠障碍和工作类型在预防高血压患者认知功能下降中的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):2431. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17343-7.
8
Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Foot Ulcers in Diabetic Patients.糖尿病患者足部溃疡风险预测模型的建立与验证。
J Diabetes Res. 2023 Feb 16;2023:1199885. doi: 10.1155/2023/1199885. eCollection 2023.
9
Evaluation of Sciatic Nerve Stiffness Using Shear Wave Elastography in Patients with Unilateral Diabetic Foot Ulcers.使用剪切波弹性成像技术评估单侧糖尿病足溃疡患者的坐骨神经硬度
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 2;13(3):547. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030547.
10
Early detection to prevent foot ulceration among type 2 diabetes mellitus patient: A multi-intervention review.2型糖尿病患者足部溃疡的早期检测预防:一项多干预综述
J Public Health Res. 2022 Mar 22;11(2):2752. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2022.2752.
中国的糖尿病足护理:挑战与策略
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Apr;4(4):297-8. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00051-6.
4
Assessment of School-Based Quasi-Experimental Nutrition and Food Safety Health Education for Primary School Students in Two Poverty-Stricken Counties of West China.中国西部两个贫困县小学生校内准实验性营养与食品安全健康教育评估
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0145090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145090. eCollection 2015.
5
A cohort study of diabetic patients and diabetic foot ulceration patients in China.一项针对中国糖尿病患者和糖尿病足溃疡患者的队列研究。
Wound Repair Regen. 2015 Mar-Apr;23(2):222-30. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12263.
6
Effects of frequency of follow-up on quality of life of type 2 diabetes patients on oral hypoglycemics.口服降糖药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者随访频率对其生活质量的影响。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Sep;14(9):777-82. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0037. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
7
Diagnostics and treatment of the diabetic foot.糖尿病足的诊断与治疗。
Endocrine. 2012 Jun;41(3):384-97. doi: 10.1007/s12020-012-9619-x. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
8
Item response theory and clinical measurement.项目反应理论与临床测量。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009;5:27-48. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153553.
9
World Diabetes Day: footing the bill.世界糖尿病日:支付费用。
Lancet. 2005;365(9470):1527. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66437-9.
10
Health-economic consequences of diabetic foot lesions.糖尿病足病变的健康经济后果。
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Aug 1;39 Suppl 2:S132-9. doi: 10.1086/383275.