• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土耳其语版简短糖尿病足溃疡风险检查表的有效性和可靠性。

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of brief diabetic foot ulceration risk checklist.

作者信息

Dincer Berna, Akdeniz Necmettin, Kanat Mustafa, Aksoy Hasan, Mete Emel, Inangil Demet, Inangil Gokhan

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Dermatology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

North Clin Istanb. 2021 Mar 12;8(2):130-138. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.72558. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.14744/nci.2021.72558
PMID:33851076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8039111/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish translation of brief diabetic foot ulceration risk checklist (BDURC).

METHODS

This methodological study was conducted at the diabetes clinic of a state hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. The data were collected with the BDURC developed by Zhou et al. in 2018. A study was conducted with 430 patients with Type 2 diabetes. The scale was retested after 4 weeks by 60 participants. Language equivalence of the scale was provided. Experts' opinions were taken about the content validity of the scale. Reliability of the scale was determined with the test-retest reliability, item-total correlation, and internal consistency analysis.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure with good model suitability. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale and its subscales was 0.79. Test-retest scores showed no statistically significant difference between the items (p>0.05). The reliability index was higher than 0.80.

CONCLUSION

The BDURC-TR is a valid and reliable tool that can be used in clinics to identify the risk factors for diabetic foot ulcers in patients with Type 2 diabetes in Turkey.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定简短糖尿病足溃疡风险检查表(BDURC)土耳其语翻译版本的有效性和可靠性。

方法

本方法学研究在土耳其伊斯坦布尔一家国立医院的糖尿病诊所进行。数据收集采用周等人于2018年编制的BDURC。对430例2型糖尿病患者进行了研究。60名参与者在4周后对该量表进行了重测。提供了该量表的语言等效性。就该量表的内容效度征求了专家意见。通过重测信度、项目-总分相关性和内部一致性分析来确定该量表的信度。

结果

验证性因素分析显示出具有良好模型适配性的双因素结构。该量表及其子量表的克朗巴哈α系数为0.79。重测得分在各项目之间无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。信度指数高于0.80。

结论

BDURC-TR是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于土耳其诊所识别2型糖尿病患者糖尿病足溃疡的危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbdd/8039111/03bb8af6a240/NCI-8-130-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbdd/8039111/03bb8af6a240/NCI-8-130-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbdd/8039111/03bb8af6a240/NCI-8-130-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of brief diabetic foot ulceration risk checklist.土耳其语版简短糖尿病足溃疡风险检查表的有效性和可靠性。
North Clin Istanb. 2021 Mar 12;8(2):130-138. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.72558. eCollection 2021.
2
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Diabetic Foot Self-Care Questionnaire of the University of Malaga (DFSQUMA).马拉加大学糖尿病足自我护理问卷土耳其语版本(DFSQUMA)的效度和信度
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2023 Oct 31:15347346231209205. doi: 10.1177/15347346231209205.
3
Turkish Adaptation of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form.糖尿病足溃疡量表-简化版的土耳其语适应性研究。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2020 Sep;19(3):269-274. doi: 10.1177/1534734620921036. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
4
The validity and reliability of the Diabetic Foot Scale-Short Form (DFS-SF) in the Turkish population: a methodological study.土耳其人群中糖尿病足量表-简化版(DFS-SF)的有效性和可靠性:一项方法学研究。
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Aug 11;53(5):1438-1447. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5711. eCollection 2023.
5
Validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the human papillomavirus knowledge scale: a methodological study.人乳头瘤病毒知识量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度:一项方法学研究。
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2023 Sep 7;24(3):177-186. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2023.2022-10-9.
6
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of Health Belief Model Scale in diabetic patients.糖尿病患者中健康信念模型量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Nov;44(8):1447-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.06.004. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
7
Development and validation of a brief diabetic foot risk screening scale for diabetic patients.糖尿病患者简易糖尿病足风险筛查量表的研制与验证
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Aug 5;7:100230. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100230. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Child-Adolescent Teasing Scale: psychometric properties of the Turkish version.儿童青少年取笑量表:土耳其语版本的心理测量特性
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2018 Sep;23(3):283-290. doi: 10.1111/camh.12250. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
9
Reliability and Validity of a Turkish version of the Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale.土耳其语版产前母乳喂养自我效能量表的信效度
Midwifery. 2018 Sep;64:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 18.
10
Turkish validity and reliability of Type-1 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale.1型糖尿病耻辱感评估量表的土耳其语效度与信度
North Clin Istanb. 2022 Dec 12;9(6):654-662. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.36937. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines on the classification of diabetic foot ulcers (IWGDF 2019).糖尿病足溃疡分类指南(IWGDF 2019)。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36 Suppl 1:e3273. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3273.
2
Development and validation of a brief diabetic foot ulceration risk checklist among diabetic patients: a multicenter longitudinal study in China.中文译文:中国多中心纵向研究:一种用于糖尿病患者的简易糖尿病足溃疡风险清单的制定与验证。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 17;8(1):962. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19268-3.
3
8. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: .8. 血糖治疗的药物治疗方法: 。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S73-S85. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S008.
4
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
5
Global epidemiology of diabetic foot ulceration: a systematic review and meta-analysis .糖尿病足溃疡的全球流行病学:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Ann Med. 2017 Mar;49(2):106-116. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1231932. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
6
A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of prognostic factors for foot ulceration in people with diabetes: the international research collaboration for the prediction of diabetic foot ulcerations (PODUS).糖尿病患者足部溃疡预后因素的系统评价与个体患者数据荟萃分析:糖尿病足溃疡预测国际研究协作组(PODUS)
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(57):1-210. doi: 10.3310/hta19570.
7
Risk assessment of patients with diabetes for foot ulcers according to risk classification consensus of International Working Group on Diabetic Foot (IWGDF).根据国际糖尿病足工作组(IWGDF)的足部溃疡风险分类共识,对糖尿病患者的足部溃疡风险进行评估。
Pak J Med Sci. 2013 May;29(3):730-4. doi: 10.12669/pjms.293.3473.
8
Community-based Diabetes Education for Latinos: The Diabetes Empowerment Education Program.基于社区的拉丁裔糖尿病教育:糖尿病赋能教育计划。
Diabetes Educ. 2010 Jul-Aug;36(4):586-94. doi: 10.1177/0145721710371524. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
9
Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research.研究中使用的测量工具的有效性和可靠性。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Dec 1;65(23):2276-84. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070364.
10
Quality of life and clinical correlates in patients with diabetic foot ulcers.糖尿病足溃疡患者的生活质量及临床相关因素
Diabetes Metab. 2005 Jun;31(3 Pt 1):263-71. doi: 10.1016/s1262-3636(07)70193-3.