• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较全凭静脉麻醉与挥发性气体麻醉用于胰腺癌手术的术后并发症及炎症标志物

Comparing Postoperative Complications and Inflammatory Markers Using Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Volatile Gas Anesthesia for Pancreatic Cancer Surgery.

作者信息

Soliz Jose M, Ifeanyi Ifeyinwa C, Katz Mathew H, Wilks Jonathan, Cata Juan P, McHugh Thomas, Fleming Jason B, Feng Lei, Rahlfs Thomas, Bruno Morgan, Gottumukkala Vijaya

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Surgical Oncology, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Aug 21;7(4):e13879. doi: 10.5812/aapm.13879. eCollection 2017 Aug.

DOI:10.5812/aapm.13879
PMID:29344445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5750426/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to evaluate postoperative complications and inflammatory profiles when using a total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) or volatile gas-opioid (VO) based anesthesia in patients undergoing pancreatic cancer surgery.

METHODS

Design, retrospective propensity score matched cohort; Setting, major academic cancer hospital; Patients, all patients who had pancreatic surgery between November 2011 and August 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matched patient pairs were formed. A total of 134 patients were included for analysis with 67 matched pairs; Interventions, Patients were categorized according to type of anesthetic used (TIVA or VO). Patients in the TIVA group received preoperative celecoxib, tramadol, and pregabalin in addition to intraoperative TIVA with propofol, lidocaine, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine. The VO-group received a volatile-opioid based anesthetic; Measurements, demographic, perioperative clinical data, platelet lymphocyte ratios, and neutrophil lymphocyte ratios were collected. Complications were graded and collected prospectively and later reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Patients receiving TIVA were more likely to have no complication or a lower grade complication than the VO-group (P = 0.014). There were no differences in LOS or postoperative inflammatory profiles noted between the TIVA and VO groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective matched analysis of patients undergoing pancreatic cancer surgery, TIVA was associated with lower grade postoperative complications. Length of hospital stay (LOS) and postoperative inflammatory profiles were not significantly different.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估在接受胰腺癌手术的患者中使用全静脉麻醉(TIVA)或挥发性气体-阿片类药物(VO)麻醉时的术后并发症和炎症指标。

方法

设计,回顾性倾向评分匹配队列;地点,大型学术癌症医院;患者,对2011年11月至2014年8月期间接受胰腺手术的所有患者进行回顾性分析。形成倾向评分匹配的患者对。共纳入134例患者进行分析,分为67对匹配组;干预措施,根据所用麻醉类型(TIVA或VO)对患者进行分类。TIVA组患者除术中使用丙泊酚、利多卡因、氯胺酮和右美托咪定进行TIVA外,术前还接受塞来昔布、曲马多和普瑞巴林治疗。VO组接受基于挥发性阿片类药物的麻醉;测量,收集人口统计学、围手术期临床数据、血小板淋巴细胞比率和中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比率。前瞻性地对并发症进行分级和收集,随后进行回顾性审查。

结果

接受TIVA的患者比VO组更有可能无并发症或并发症等级更低(P = 0.014)。TIVA组和VO组之间在住院时间或术后炎症指标方面没有差异。

结论

在这项对接受胰腺癌手术患者的回顾性匹配分析中,TIVA与较低等级的术后并发症相关。住院时间(LOS)和术后炎症指标没有显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ae/5750426/d1708aedb141/aapm-07-04-13879-i002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ae/5750426/9533e23ed8ba/aapm-07-04-13879-i001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ae/5750426/d1708aedb141/aapm-07-04-13879-i002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ae/5750426/9533e23ed8ba/aapm-07-04-13879-i001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ae/5750426/d1708aedb141/aapm-07-04-13879-i002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing Postoperative Complications and Inflammatory Markers Using Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Volatile Gas Anesthesia for Pancreatic Cancer Surgery.比较全凭静脉麻醉与挥发性气体麻醉用于胰腺癌手术的术后并发症及炎症标志物
Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Aug 21;7(4):e13879. doi: 10.5812/aapm.13879. eCollection 2017 Aug.
2
Evaluating the Impact of Total Intravenous Anesthesia on the Clinical Outcomes and Perioperative NLR and PLR Profiles of Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.评估全凭静脉麻醉对接受减瘤手术联合热腹腔内化疗患者临床结局及围手术期中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)指标的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;23(8):2419-29. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5176-5. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
3
Total intravenous anesthesia decreases hospital stay but not incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications after lung resection surgery: a propensity score matching study.全静脉麻醉可减少肺切除术后患者的住院时间,但不降低术后肺部并发症的发生率:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Oct 17;23(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02260-4.
4
Effects of Volatile versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Occurrence of Myocardial Injury after Non-Cardiac Surgery.挥发性麻醉与全凭静脉麻醉对非心脏手术后心肌损伤发生情况的影响
J Clin Med. 2019 Nov 15;8(11):1999. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111999.
5
A Comparison of Volatile Anesthesia and Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) Effects on Outcome From Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.比较挥发性麻醉与全静脉麻醉(TIVA)对心脏手术结果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Apr;35(4):1096-1105. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.10.036. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
6
Postoperative ileus risk after posterior thoracolumbar fusion performed with total intravenous anesthesia versus inhaled anesthesia.全身静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉行胸腰椎后路融合术后的术后肠梗阻风险。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 Oct 28;38(3):307-312. doi: 10.3171/2022.9.SPINE22520. Print 2023 Mar 1.
7
High thoracic epidural anesthesia in coronary artery bypass surgery: a propensity-matched study.冠状动脉搭桥手术中的高位胸椎硬膜外麻醉:一项倾向匹配研究。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Dec;21(6):810-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.11.012. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
8
Comparison between total intravenous anesthesia and balanced anesthesia on postoperative opioid consumption in patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy.全凭静脉麻醉与平衡麻醉对接受腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术患者术后阿片类药物消耗量的比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(19):e20224. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020224.
9
The influence of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative outcomes in end-stage renal disease patients: A retrospective observation study.丙泊酚全静脉麻醉对终末期肾病患者术后转归的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0254014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254014. eCollection 2021.
10
Randomized comparison of the feasibility of three anesthetic techniques for day-case open inguinal hernia repair.三种麻醉技术用于日间开放腹股沟疝修补术可行性的随机对照研究
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:166-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.062. Epub 2016 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Microvascular Reconstruction for Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.全凭静脉麻醉对接受头颈癌微血管重建术患者术后肺部并发症的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Sep 15;148(11):1013-21. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.2552.
2
Anesthetics and Long Term Cancer Outcomes: May Epigenetics Be the Key for Pancreatic Cancer?麻醉与长期癌症结局:表观遗传学是否可能成为胰腺癌的关键?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Aug 14;58(8):1102. doi: 10.3390/medicina58081102.
3
Pancreatic Cancer and Microenvironments: Implications of Anesthesia.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Postoperative Complications on a Timely Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy (RIOT): the Role of Enhanced Recovery in the Cancer Journey.术后并发症对及时恢复预定肿瘤治疗(RIOT)的影响:加速康复在癌症治疗过程中的作用。
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2016 Fall;54(4):e33-46. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000113.
2
Is a surgical approach justified for octogenarians with pancreatic carcinoma? Projecting surgical decision making for octogenarian patients.对于患有胰腺癌的八旬老人,手术治疗方法是否合理?预测八旬患者的手术决策。
Am J Surg. 2016 Nov;212(5):896-902. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.12.033. Epub 2016 May 11.
3
胰腺癌与微环境:麻醉的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 28;14(11):2684. doi: 10.3390/cancers14112684.
4
Anesthesia Options and the Recurrence of Cancer: What We Know so Far?麻醉选择与癌症复发:我们目前所了解的情况?
Local Reg Anesth. 2020 Jul 7;13:57-72. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S240567. eCollection 2020.
5
Propofol-based intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in pancreatic cancer surgery.丙泊酚静脉麻醉与地氟烷麻醉相比,可提高胰腺癌手术患者的生存率。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233598. eCollection 2020.
Effect of propofol and sevoflurane on the inflammatory response of patients undergoing craniotomy.
丙泊酚和七氟醚对开颅手术患者炎症反应的影响。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Mar 22;16:18. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0182-5.
4
Evaluating the Impact of Total Intravenous Anesthesia on the Clinical Outcomes and Perioperative NLR and PLR Profiles of Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.评估全凭静脉麻醉对接受减瘤手术联合热腹腔内化疗患者临床结局及围手术期中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)指标的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;23(8):2419-29. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5176-5. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
5
Dexmedetomidine decreases the inflammatory response to myocardial surgery under mini-cardiopulmonary bypass.右美托咪定可减轻小儿体外循环下心脏手术的炎症反应。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016;49(4):e4646. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20154646. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
6
Impact of anesthetic technique on the stress response elicited by laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized trial.麻醉技术对腹腔镜胆囊切除术引发的应激反应的影响:一项随机试验。
J Anesth. 2016 Jun;30(3):522-5. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2148-7. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
7
Advantages and Disadvantages of Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage in Distal Pancreatectomy.胰体尾切除术预防性腹腔引流的利弊
World J Surg. 2016 May;40(5):1226-35. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3399-4.
8
Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Therapeutic Outcome After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值可预测壶腹周围癌胰十二指肠切除术后的治疗结果。
Anticancer Res. 2016 Jan;36(1):403-8.
9
The predictive role of NLR and PLR for solid non-AIDS defining cancer incidence in HIV-infected subjects: a MASTER cohort study.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)对HIV感染患者实体非艾滋病定义癌症发病率的预测作用:一项MASTER队列研究
Infect Agent Cancer. 2015 Oct 5;10:34. doi: 10.1186/s13027-015-0032-y. eCollection 2015.
10
Preoperative platelet-lymphocyte ratio is superior to neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor for soft-tissue sarcoma.术前血小板与淋巴细胞比值作为软组织肉瘤的预后因素优于中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 2;15:648. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1654-6.