Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚全静脉麻醉对终末期肾病患者术后转归的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。

The influence of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative outcomes in end-stage renal disease patients: A retrospective observation study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Biostatistics, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0254014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254014. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine whether the anesthetic method of propofol total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is associated with postoperative outcome in ESRD patients, we evaluated the incidence of postoperative major adverse cardiac events (MACE), comparing propofol TIVA versus anesthesia with volatile anesthesia in ESRD patients.

METHODS

Retrospectively, we identified cases with ESRD patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were divided into those who received only volatile anesthesia (volatile group) and those who received only propofol TIVA (TIVA group). The incidence of MACE and potential confounding variables were compared separately in a univariate logistic model and subsequently by multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among the 2576 cases in ESRD patients, 1374 were in the TIVA group and 1202 were in the volatile group. The multivariate analysis included 12 factors, including the anesthesia method, of which five factors were significant. Factors that were associated with a significantly lower MACE risk included preoperative chloride concentration (OR: 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99), baseline SBP (OR: 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99), and propofol TIVA (OR: 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

We inferred that the anesthetic method associated with the postoperative outcome in patients with ESRD.

摘要

背景

为了确定丙泊酚全静脉麻醉(TIVA)的麻醉方法是否与终末期肾病(ESRD)患者的术后结果相关,我们评估了术后主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的发生率,比较了 ESRD 患者中丙泊酚 TIVA 与挥发性麻醉的麻醉方法。

方法

我们回顾性地确定了接受全身麻醉下手术的 ESRD 患者的病例。患者分为仅接受挥发性麻醉(挥发性组)和仅接受丙泊酚 TIVA(TIVA 组)的患者。分别在单变量逻辑模型和随后的多变量逻辑回归中比较了 MACE 的发生率和潜在的混杂变量。

结果

在 2576 例 ESRD 患者中,1374 例在 TIVA 组,1202 例在挥发性组。多变量分析包括 12 个因素,包括麻醉方法,其中 5 个因素是显著的。与 MACE 风险显著降低相关的因素包括术前氯浓度(OR:0.96;95%CI,0.92-0.99)、基线 SBP(OR:0.98;95%CI,0.98-0.99)和丙泊酚 TIVA(OR:0.37;95%CI,0.22-0.60)。

结论

我们推断,麻醉方法与 ESRD 患者的术后结果相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8c7/8297880/5b4d2ef3c135/pone.0254014.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验