Goswami Kiran, Salve H, Malhotra S, Kumar Y
Centre for Community Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
CMET, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2017 Dec;7(Suppl 1):S27-S32. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_155_17.
Family Health Advisory Services (FHAS) posting as well as its assessment is resource demanding but fails to enjoy priority. Study focuses on a holistic overview of the assessment process to understand need for change.
The aim of this study is to identify perceived gaps in current assessment practices related to FHAS posting.
A cross-sectional mixed method study among all the V semester students currently undergoing assessment for the posting, past students (selected VII semester students and interns), preceptors (supervising residents - postgraduate students in department and senior resident, health assistants, medical social service officer), and involved faculty.
Self-administered questionnaire, in-depth interview, focus group discussions (two) as well as observations using checklist were used for data collection and triangulation.
Quantitative data used in this study were statistical measures of central tendency and dispersion. Qualitative data transcript repeatedly read to identify underlying common themes, compared to draw inference.
There was a lack of guidelines and communication regarding assessment. Formative assessment was not performed and replaced by one time end assessment. All components of learning were not assessed. End-posting assessment was not standardized and unrelated to learning objectives. Award of scores was skewed toward right for intervention and toward left for analysis and community diagnosis.
There is a need to focus on proper implementation of programme to strengthen formative assessment. Assessment should be relevant to learning objectives of posting. Faculty has to lead by example.
家庭健康咨询服务(FHAS)实习安排及其评估需要大量资源,但未得到应有的重视。本研究聚焦于评估过程的全面概述,以了解变革的必要性。
本研究旨在找出当前与FHAS实习安排相关的评估实践中存在的明显差距。
对所有正在接受实习安排评估的五年级学生、往届学生(选定的七年级学生和实习生)、带教老师(住院医师导师——科室研究生和高级住院医师、健康助理、医疗社会服务官员)以及相关教师开展一项横断面混合方法研究。
采用自填式问卷、深度访谈、焦点小组讨论(两次)以及使用清单进行观察来收集数据并进行三角互证。
本研究中使用的定量数据采用集中趋势和离散度的统计量度。定性数据转录本反复阅读以确定潜在的共同主题,并进行比较以得出推论。
在评估方面缺乏指导方针和沟通。未进行形成性评估,而是由一次性的终结性评估取而代之。学习的所有组成部分均未得到评估。实习结束评估未标准化,且与学习目标无关。干预部分的评分偏向右侧,分析和社区诊断部分的评分偏向左侧。
需要注重课程的妥善实施,以加强形成性评估。评估应与实习安排的学习目标相关。教师必须以身作则。