• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过焦点小组讨论和深入访谈对医学生学习策略进行定性评估

Qualitative Assessment of Learning Strategies among Medical Students Using Focus Group Discussions and In-depth Interviews.

作者信息

Joshi Anuradha Sujai, Ganjiwale Jaishree Deepak, Varma Jagdish, Singh Praveen, Modi Jyoti Nath, Singh Tejinder

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Pramukh Swami Medical College, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad, Gujarat, India.

Department of Central Research Services, Pramukh Swami Medical College, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2017 Dec;7(Suppl 1):S33-S37. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_144_17.

DOI:10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_144_17
PMID:29344455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5769167/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Globally, students with top academic performance and high intellectual capacity usually opt to study medicine. However, once students get enrolled, their academic performance varies widely. Such variations appear to be determined by various factors, one of them being types of learning strategies adopted by students. The learning strategies utilized by the students with better academic performance are likely to be more effective learning strategies.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The objective is to identify effective learning strategies used by medical students.

METHODOLOGY

This study was carried out among the MBBS students of Final Professional Part I. Students were categorized into three groups namely: high, average, and low rankers based on overall academic performance in second Professional University examination. First, a questionnaire consisting of closed- and open-ended questions was administered to students, to find their learning strategies. Subsequently, focus group discussion and in-depth interviews were conducted for high- and low-rankers. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. Key statements were highlighted, collated, and categorized into general themes and sub-themes.

RESULTS

Evident themes which emerged as effective strategies were hard work in the form of regularity of studies, meticulous preparation of notes, constructive use of time, utilization of e-learning, learning styles and deep learning approach and regular ward visits. Intrinsic motivation, family support, balancing physical activities and studies, guidance by seniors, teachers, dealing with nonacademic issues such as language barriers and stress were also identified as important strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Disseminating effective learning strategies in a systematic manner may be helpful to students in achieving better academic outcomes. Furthermore, educationists need to modulate their teaching strategies based on students' feedback.

摘要

背景

在全球范围内,学业成绩优异、智力超群的学生通常会选择学医。然而,一旦入学,他们的学业表现差异很大。这种差异似乎由多种因素决定,其中之一是学生采用的学习策略类型。学业成绩较好的学生所采用的学习策略可能是更有效的学习策略。

目的

确定医学生使用的有效学习策略。

方法

本研究在医学学士最后专业第一部分的学生中进行。根据第二专业大学考试的总体学业成绩,学生被分为三组,即高分、中等和低分学生。首先,向学生发放一份包含封闭式和开放式问题的问卷,以了解他们的学习策略。随后,对高分和低分学生进行了焦点小组讨论和深入访谈。讨论进行了录音、转录和分析。关键陈述被突出显示、整理,并归类为一般主题和子主题。

结果

作为有效策略出现的明显主题是以学习规律、精心准备笔记、建设性地利用时间、利用电子学习、学习风格和深度学习方法以及定期病房查房等形式的努力学习。内在动机、家庭支持、平衡体育活动和学习、高年级学生和教师的指导、处理语言障碍和压力等非学术问题也被确定为重要策略。

结论

系统地传播有效的学习策略可能有助于学生取得更好的学业成绩。此外,教育工作者需要根据学生的反馈调整他们的教学策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051b/5769167/d22065fbc40e/IJABMR-7-33-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051b/5769167/83e41a957881/IJABMR-7-33-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051b/5769167/289a8c4d38e2/IJABMR-7-33-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051b/5769167/efeaf6ac2e10/IJABMR-7-33-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051b/5769167/d22065fbc40e/IJABMR-7-33-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051b/5769167/83e41a957881/IJABMR-7-33-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051b/5769167/289a8c4d38e2/IJABMR-7-33-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051b/5769167/efeaf6ac2e10/IJABMR-7-33-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051b/5769167/d22065fbc40e/IJABMR-7-33-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Qualitative Assessment of Learning Strategies among Medical Students Using Focus Group Discussions and In-depth Interviews.通过焦点小组讨论和深入访谈对医学生学习策略进行定性评估
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2017 Dec;7(Suppl 1):S33-S37. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_144_17.
2
What factors determine academic achievement in high achieving undergraduate medical students? A qualitative study.高成就本科医学生学业成绩的决定因素有哪些?一项定性研究。
Med Teach. 2014 Apr;36 Suppl 1:S43-8. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.886011.
3
High- and low-achieving international medical students' perceptions of the factors influencing their academic performance at Chinese universities.高成就和低成就国际医学生对影响其在华大学学业表现因素的看法。
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2300194. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2300194. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
4
Analysis of learning and teaching strategies in Surgery Module: A mixed methods study.外科模块中学习与教学策略的分析:一项混合方法研究。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2019 Sep;69(9):1287-1292.
5
Absenteeism of Medical Students from Subspecialty Clinical Rotations: A Qualitative Study.医学生在专科临床轮转中的缺勤情况:一项定性研究。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019 Jan;29(1):45-50. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.01.45.
6
Students' perspective of bedside teaching: A qualitative study.学生对床边教学的看法:一项定性研究。
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Mar-Apr;32(2):351-5. doi: 10.12669/pjms.322.9194.
7
Coping Strategies of Failing International Medical Students in Two Chinese Universities: A Qualitative Study.两所中国大学中考试失利的国际医学学生的应对策略:一项定性研究
Teach Learn Med. 2024 Apr-May;36(2):123-133. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2023.2204077. Epub 2023 Apr 22.
8
Exploration of constructive feedback practices in dental education chairside teaching: A case study.探索口腔医学教育椅旁教学中的建设性反馈实践:一个案例研究。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2020 Aug;24(3):580-589. doi: 10.1111/eje.12539. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
9
Why do medical students forget anatomy later on? A qualitative study.为什么医学生日后会忘记解剖学知识?一项定性研究。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2018 Aug;68(8):1228-1232.
10
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.

引用本文的文献

1
Action competence in obstetric emergencies-can this be achieved via e-learning? Interprofessional blended learning module on diagnostics and emergency treatment of shoulder dystocia.产科急症中的行动能力-能否通过电子学习实现?肩难产的诊断和紧急处理的跨专业混合学习模块。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 18;23(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04335-9.
2
English or Arabic in Healthcare Education: Perspectives of Healthcare Alumni, Students, and Instructors.医疗保健教育中的英语或阿拉伯语:医疗保健校友、学生和教师的观点。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Sep 15;14:2537-2547. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S330579. eCollection 2021.
3
Self-regulated learning in a competency-based and flipped learning environment: learning strategies across achievement levels and years.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceived stress in first year medical students - associations with personal resources and emotional distress.一年级医学生的感知压力——与个人资源和情绪困扰的关联
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jan 6;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0841-8.
2
Profiles of Psychological Well-being and Coping Strategies among University Students.大学生的心理健康状况与应对策略剖析
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 13;7:1554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01554. eCollection 2016.
3
Mindfulness based stress reduction for medical students: optimising student satisfaction and engagement.
基于能力和翻转学习环境中的自我调节学习:不同成就水平和年级的学习策略。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1686949. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1686949.
针对医学生的基于正念减压疗法:优化学生满意度与参与度。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 18;16(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0728-8.
4
Stress, Burnout and Coping Strategies in Preclinical Medical Students.临床前医学生的压力、职业倦怠与应对策略
N Am J Med Sci. 2016 Feb;8(2):75-81. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.177299.
5
Physical activity and academic achievement among the medical students: A cross-sectional study.医学生的体育活动与学业成绩:一项横断面研究。
Med Teach. 2016;38 Suppl 1:S66-72. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1142516.
6
English language proficiency and academic performance: A study of a medical preparatory year program in Saudi Arabia.英语水平与学业成绩:沙特阿拉伯医学预科项目研究
Avicenna J Med. 2015 Oct-Dec;5(4):140-4. doi: 10.4103/2231-0770.165126.
7
Exam Success at Undergraduate and Graduate-Entry Medical Schools: Is Learning Style or Learning Approach More Important? A Critical Review Exploring Links Between Academic Success, Learning Styles, and Learning Approaches Among School-Leaver Entry ("Traditional") and Graduate-Entry ("Nontraditional") Medical Students.本科及研究生入学医学院的考试成功:学习风格还是学习方法更重要?一项批判性综述,探讨离校生入学(“传统”)和研究生入学(“非传统”)医学生的学业成功、学习风格与学习方法之间的联系。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(3):237-44. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1046734.
8
A student-led process to enhance the learning and teaching of teamwork skills in medicine.一个由学生主导的提升医学团队合作技能学习与教学的过程。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2013 May-Aug;26(2):78-84. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.120698.
9
Exploring medical student decisions regarding attending live lectures and using recorded lectures.探讨医学生是否选择参加现场讲座和使用录制讲座。
Med Teach. 2013 Sep;35(9):767-71. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.801940. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
10
The impact of lecture attendance and other variables on how medical students evaluate faculty in a preclinical program.讲座出勤和其他变量对医学生如何评估临床前课程教师的影响。
Acad Med. 2013 Jul;88(7):972-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318294e99a.