Freire Carlos, Ferradás María Del Mar, Valle Antonio, Núñez José C, Vallejo Guillermo
Research Group in Educational Psychology, Department of Evolutionary and Educational Psychology, University of A Coruña A Coruña, Spain.
Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo Oviedo, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 13;7:1554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01554. eCollection 2016.
In the transactional model of stress, coping responses are the key to preventing the stress response. In this study, the possible role of psychological well-being as a personal determinant of coping strategies in the academic context was analyzed. Specifically, the study has two objectives: (a) to identify different profiles of students according to their level of psychological well-being; and (b) to analyze the differences between these profiles in the use of three coping strategies (positive reappraisal, support-seeking, and planning). Age, gender, and degree were estimated as covariables. A total of 1,072 university students participated in the study. Latent profile analysis was applied to four indices of psychological well-being: self-acceptance, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth. An optimal four-profile solution, reflecting significant incremental shifts from low to very high psychological well-being, was obtained. As predicted, the profile membership distinguished between participants in positive reappraisal, support-seeking, and planning. Importantly, the higher the profile of psychological well-being was, the higher the use of the three coping strategies. Gender differences in coping strategies were observed, but no interaction effects with psychological well-being were found. Age and degree were not relevant in explaining the use of coping strategies. These results suggest that psychological well-being stands as an important personal resource to favor adaptive coping strategies for academic stress.
在压力的交互作用模型中,应对反应是预防压力反应的关键。在本研究中,分析了心理健康作为学术背景下应对策略的个人决定因素的可能作用。具体而言,该研究有两个目标:(a) 根据学生的心理健康水平确定不同的学生类型;(b) 分析这些类型在使用三种应对策略(积极重新评价、寻求支持和计划)方面的差异。将年龄、性别和学位作为协变量进行估计。共有1072名大学生参与了该研究。对心理健康的四个指标进行了潜在剖面分析:自我接受、环境掌控、生活目的和个人成长。得到了一个最优的四类型解决方案,反映了从低到非常高的心理健康水平的显著递增变化。正如预测的那样,类型成员在积极重新评价、寻求支持和计划方面区分了参与者。重要的是,心理健康水平越高,三种应对策略的使用频率越高。观察到应对策略存在性别差异,但未发现与心理健康的交互作用。年龄和学位与解释应对策略的使用无关。这些结果表明,心理健康是有利于应对学术压力的适应性应对策略的重要个人资源。