Suppr超能文献

创伤患者早期与晚期气管切开术:韩国一家机构5年数据的倾向匹配队列研究

Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in Trauma Patients: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study of 5 Years' Data at a Single Institution in Korea.

作者信息

Kang Byung Hee, Cho Jayun, Lee John Cook-Jong, Jung Kyoungwon

机构信息

Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164 World Cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, 16499, Korea.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2018 Jun;42(6):1742-1747. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4474-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although there have been many studies dealing with tracheostomy timing in trauma patients, the optimal timing is still being debated. This study aimed to compare outcomes between early tracheostomy (ET) and late tracheostomy (LT) in trauma populations to estimate the optimal timing of tracheostomy after intubation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the 5 years' data of trauma patients who underwent tracheostomy during their acute intensive care unit (ICU) stay. The cases were divided into two groups: ET was defined as tracheostomy performed within 7 days after intubation, and LT, after the seventh day. Propensity score matching was utilized using a 1-to-1 matching technique, and outcomes between two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Among 236 enrolled patients, 76 met the criteria for ET and 160 were included for LT. Using propensity matching, 70 patients who met the criteria for ET were matched to 70 patients in the LT. Based on the comparison of outcomes after matching, ET showed significantly shorter values than LT in overall ventilator duration, length of stay at the ICU, and post-tracheostomy ventilation duration. Furthermore, the incidence of pneumonia was significantly lower with ET than with LT, although the rate of postoperative complications showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that ET should be considered in trauma patients needing prolonged mechanical ventilation. Also, we recommend that surgeons perform tracheostomy as early as within 7 days after intubation to not only reduce the ventilation and ICU days but also prevent pneumonia without worrying about an increase in postoperative complications.

摘要

背景

尽管已有许多关于创伤患者气管切开时机的研究,但最佳时机仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较创伤患者早期气管切开(ET)和晚期气管切开(LT)的结局,以评估插管后气管切开的最佳时机。

方法

我们回顾性分析了在急性重症监护病房(ICU)住院期间接受气管切开的创伤患者的5年数据。病例分为两组:ET定义为插管后7天内进行气管切开,LT为7天后进行。采用1:1匹配技术进行倾向评分匹配,并比较两组的结局。

结果

在236例纳入患者中,76例符合ET标准,160例纳入LT组。通过倾向匹配,70例符合ET标准的患者与70例LT组患者匹配。基于匹配后结局的比较,ET组在总机械通气时间、ICU住院时间和气管切开后通气时间方面均显著短于LT组。此外,ET组肺炎发生率显著低于LT组,尽管术后并发症发生率无显著差异。

结论

我们建议,对于需要长时间机械通气的创伤患者应考虑早期气管切开。此外,我们建议外科医生在插管后7天内尽早进行气管切开,这不仅可以缩短通气时间和ICU住院天数,还能预防肺炎,同时不用担心术后并发症增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验