• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提升循证决策能力:经济评价标准的作用。

Enhancing Capacity for Evidence-Based Policymaking: the Role of Economic Evaluation Standards.

机构信息

Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, Department of Health and Human Services, 330 C Street SW, Washington, DC, 20201, USA.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2018 Apr;19(3):391-395. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0872-y.

DOI:10.1007/s11121-018-0872-y
PMID:29344771
Abstract

This commentary will describe some ongoing activities that are moving the federal government toward stronger use of evidence in decision-making. In particular, the work of the Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking points to directions that have implications for capacity building and the institutionalization of economic evaluation, as well as mechanisms and resources that could make economic evaluation more feasible. Bipartisan legislation incorporates many of the recommendations of the Commission and reinforces efforts already underway at individual agencies as well as among interagency groups. Understanding the current context of evidence-based policymaking in the federal government can enable economic researchers to better influence the processes of capacity building, shape the designs of evaluations, and inform decision-making. The commentary highlights areas where further elaboration of economic evaluation principles could be useful to support evidence building, implementation, and program improvement.

摘要

本评论将描述一些正在进行的活动,这些活动正在推动联邦政府更加强有力地在决策中使用证据。特别是,循证决策委员会的工作为能力建设和经济评估的制度化指明了方向,同时也为经济评估提供了更可行的机制和资源。两党立法采纳了委员会的许多建议,加强了各机构以及机构间团体已经开展的工作。了解联邦政府循证决策的当前背景,可以使经济研究人员更好地影响能力建设过程,设计评估,并为决策提供信息。本评论强调了进一步阐述经济评估原则以支持证据建设、实施和项目改进的有用领域。

相似文献

1
Enhancing Capacity for Evidence-Based Policymaking: the Role of Economic Evaluation Standards.提升循证决策能力:经济评价标准的作用。
Prev Sci. 2018 Apr;19(3):391-395. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0872-y.
2
The influence of cost-per-DALY information in health prioritisation and desirable features for a registry: a survey of health policy experts in Vietnam, India and Bangladesh.每伤残调整生命年成本信息对卫生优先排序的影响及登记册的理想特征:对越南、印度和孟加拉国卫生政策专家的调查
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Dec 3;14(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0156-6.
3
Identifying priority technical and context-specific issues in improving the conduct, reporting and use of health economic evaluation in low- and middle-income countries.确定在提高中低收入国家卫生经济评估的实施、报告和使用方面的优先技术和具体问题。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 5;16(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0280-6.
4
Exploring health researchers' perceptions of policymaking in Argentina: a qualitative study.探索阿根廷卫生研究人员对政策制定的看法:一项定性研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Sep;29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii40-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu071.
5
Policymakers' Research Capacities, Engagement, and Use of Research in Public Health Policymaking.政策制定者的研究能力、参与度以及在公共卫生政策制定中对研究的利用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 20;18(21):11014. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111014.
6
Examining the use of health systems and policy research in the health policymaking process in Israel: views of researchers.审视以色列卫生政策制定过程中卫生系统与政策研究的应用:研究人员的观点
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Sep 1;14(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0139-7.
7
Generating demand for and use of evaluation evidence in government health ministries: lessons from a pilot programme in Uganda and Zambia.在政府卫生部推动对评价证据的需求及应用:来自乌干达和赞比亚一个试点项目的经验教训
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Oct 2;15(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0250-4.
8
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
9
Building policy-making capacity in the Ministry of Health: the Kazakhstan experience.建设哈萨克斯坦卫生部的政策制定能力:哈萨克斯坦的经验
Hum Resour Health. 2015 Jan 20;13:4. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-13-4.
10
Research evidence and policy: qualitative study in selected provinces in South Africa and Cameroon.研究证据与政策:在南非和喀麦隆部分省份开展的定性研究
Implement Sci. 2015 Sep 3;10:126. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0315-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Cultural Adaptation of Promising, Evidence-Based, and Best Practices: a Scoping Literature Review.有前途的、基于证据的和最佳实践的文化适应:范围文献综述。
Prev Sci. 2020 Jan;21(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01042-0.