• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development of the HOOS to Assess Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Preservation Procedures.HOOS 量表的制定:用于评估接受髋关节保髋手术患者的患者报告结局。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;46(4):940-946. doi: 10.1177/0363546517749585. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
2
Validation of the HOOS, JR: A Short-form Hip Replacement Survey.《髋关节置换术患者报告结局量表简表(HOOS,JR)的验证》
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1472-82. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4718-2. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
3
Defining Patient-relevant Thresholds and Change Scores for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR Anchored on the Patient-acceptable Symptom State Question.定义与患者相关的 HOOS JR 和 KOOS JR 阈值和变化分数,以患者可接受的症状状态问题为基础。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Apr 1;482(4):688-698. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002857. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
4
Development and Validation of Crosswalks Between the Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement/Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement.西安大略大学和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数与髋关节残疾及骨关节炎疗效评分关节置换/膝关节损伤及骨关节炎疗效评分关节置换之间的转换关系的建立与验证。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6):1034-1039.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
5
Sensitivity to Change of a Computer Adaptive Testing Instrument for Outcome Measurement After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty and Periacetabular Osteotomy.髋膝关节置换术和髋臼周围截骨术后用于结果测量的计算机自适应测试工具对变化的敏感性。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Sep;46(9):756-67. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6442. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
6
Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Periacetabular Osteotomy.髋臼周围截骨术患者报告结局测量的心理计量学特性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Mar 20;101(6):e21. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00185.
7
What Are the Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?初次全髋关节置换术后髋关节障碍和骨关节炎结果评分中最小临床重要差异和患者可接受症状状态的诊断特异性阈值是什么?
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jul;39(7):1783-1788.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.051. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
8
Age at the Time of Surgery Is Not Predictive of Early Patient-Reported Outcomes After Periacetabular Osteotomy.手术时的年龄与髋臼周围截骨术后早期患者报告的结果无关。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Oct;36(10):3388-3391. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.05.029. Epub 2021 May 25.
9
Patients Requiring Both Total Hip Arthroplasty and Lumbar Spinal Fusion Have Lower Hip Functional Outcome Scores: A Matched Case-Control Study.需要全髋关节置换术和腰椎脊柱融合术的患者髋关节功能预后评分较低:一项匹配的病例对照研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 May;39(5):1291-1297. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.11.004. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
10
Mapping and Crosswalk of the Oxford Hip Score and Different Versions of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score.牛津髋关节评分与髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分不同版本的映射和转换。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jul 1;479(7):1534-1544. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001675.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Hip Pain Through Social Media: An Initial Overview of an International Web-Based Survey.通过社交媒体了解髋部疼痛:一项基于网络的国际调查的初步概述。
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Feb 15;32:101625. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101625. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Clinical outcomes of proximal femoral reconstruction technique combined with THA in the treatment of high dislocation secondary to septic arthritis: a retrospective single-center study.股骨近端重建技术联合全髋关节置换术治疗感染性关节炎致髋关节高位脱位的临床疗效:一项回顾性单中心研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Sep 14;24(1):732. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06818-8.
3
Stepping Beyond Counts in Recovery of Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study on Passively Collected Gait Metrics.超越髋关节置换术总恢复计数:被动采集步态指标的前瞻性研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 20;23(14):6538. doi: 10.3390/s23146538.
4
The relationship between pre-operative pain characteristics and periacetabular osteotomy outcomes in patients with acetabular dysplasia.髋臼发育不良患者术前疼痛特征与髋臼周围截骨术结果的关系。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2022 Jan 21;9(1):44-50. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnac004. eCollection 2022 Jan.
5
The minimal clinically important difference for the nonarthritic hip score at 2-years following hip arthroscopy.髋关节镜术后 2 年时非关节炎性髋关节评分的最小临床重要差异。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jul;30(7):2419-2423. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06756-9. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
6
Mid-Term Outcomes of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Adult Patients with Childhood Hip Infection.儿童髋关节感染成年患者行非骨水泥全髋关节置换术的中期疗效。
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Mar 13;27:e930760. doi: 10.12659/MSM.930760.
7
Development of the KOOS Platform to Measure Patient-Reported Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后患者报告结局测量的 KOOS 平台的开发。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Oct;46(12):2915-2921. doi: 10.1177/0363546518789619. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining Thresholds for the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the IKDC Subjective Knee Form and KOOS for Patients Who Underwent ACL Reconstruction.确定接受前交叉韧带重建手术患者的IKDC膝关节主观评分表和KOOS的患者可接受症状状态阈值。
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Nov;44(11):2820-2826. doi: 10.1177/0363546516652888. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
2
Validation of the HOOS, JR: A Short-form Hip Replacement Survey.《髋关节置换术患者报告结局量表简表(HOOS,JR)的验证》
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1472-82. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4718-2. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
3
Floor and ceiling effects in the OHS: an analysis of the NHS PROMs data set.职业健康状况调查中的地板效应和天花板效应:对英国国家医疗服务体系患者报告结局测量数据集的分析
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 27;5(7):e007765. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007765.
4
Validation of the Core Outcome Measures Index in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement.股骨髋臼撞击症患者核心结局指标指数的验证
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jul;31(7):1238-46. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
5
The Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS) for patients with femoroacetabular impingement.用于股骨髋臼撞击症患者的髋关节运动活动量表(HSAS)
Hip Int. 2013 Mar-Apr;23(2):204-11. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000006. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
6
Does the modified Harris hip score reflect patient satisfaction after hip arthroscopy?改良 Harris 髋关节评分能否反映髋关节镜术后患者的满意度?
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Nov;40(11):2557-60. doi: 10.1177/0363546512460650. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
7
The Development and validation of a self-administered quality-of-life outcome measure for young, active patients with symptomatic hip disease: the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33).一种用于有症状髋病的年轻、活跃患者的自我管理生活质量结局测量工具的开发和验证:国际髋关节结局工具(iHOT-33)。
Arthroscopy. 2012 May;28(5):595-605; quiz 606-10.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.03.013.
8
Is the SF-12 version 2 Health Survey a valid and equivalent substitute for the SF-36 version 2 Health Survey for the Chinese?SF-12 版本 2 健康调查是否是 SF-36 版本 2 健康调查的有效且等效替代品?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Feb;19(1):200-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01800.x. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
9
The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist.哥本哈根髋与腹股沟结局评分(HAGOS):根据 COSMIN 清单制定和验证。
Br J Sports Med. 2011 May;45(6):478-91. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.080937.
10
The German Hip Outcome Score: validation in patients undergoing surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement.德国髋关节评分:在接受髋关节撞击症手术治疗的患者中的验证。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Mar;27(3):339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.07.021. Epub 2010 Nov 11.

HOOS 量表的制定:用于评估接受髋关节保髋手术患者的患者报告结局。

Development of the HOOS to Assess Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Preservation Procedures.

机构信息

Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;46(4):940-946. doi: 10.1177/0363546517749585. Epub 2018 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1177/0363546517749585
PMID:29345504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6942686/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The creation of a single patient-reported outcome (PRO) platform validated across hip preservation, osteoarthritis (OA), and total hip arthroplasty (THA) populations may reduce barriers and streamline the routine collection of PROs in clinical practice. As such, the purpose of this study was to determine if augmenting the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) with additional HOOS questions would result in a PRO platform that could be used across a wider spectrum of hip patient populations.

HYPOTHESIS

The HOOS, JR would demonstrate a notable ceiling effect, but by augmenting the HOOS, JR with additional HOOS questions, a responsive PRO platform could be created.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Using preoperative and postoperative HOOS responses from a sample of 304 patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), additional items were identified to augment the HOOS, JR. The psychometric properties of a newly created PRO tool (HOOS) were then compared with the HOOS, JR and other PRO instruments developed for patients with hip OA and/or undergoing THA.

RESULTS

By augmenting the HOOS, JR with 2 additional questions, the HOOS was more responsive than all other included PRO tools and had significantly fewer maximum postoperative scores than the HOOS, JR ( P < .0001), HOOS-Physical Function Short form ( P < .0001), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index ( P = .02), University of California, Los Angeles activity scale ( P = .0002), and modified Harris Hip Score ( P = .04). The postoperative HOOS score threshold associated with patients achieving the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) was 62.5.

CONCLUSION

The HOOS is a valid and responsive PRO tool after PAO and may potentially provide the orthopaedic community with a PRO platform to be used across hip-related subspecialties. For patients undergoing PAO, a postoperative HOOS score ≥62.5 was associated with patients achieving the PASS.

摘要

背景

创建一个经过髋关节保护、骨关节炎(OA)和全髋关节置换术(THA)人群验证的单一患者报告结局(PRO)平台,可能会降低障碍并简化临床实践中 PRO 的常规收集。因此,本研究的目的是确定通过增加额外的 HOOS 问题来扩展 Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement(HOOS,JR)是否会创建一个可以在更广泛的髋关节患者人群中使用的响应式 PRO 平台。

假设

HOOS,JR 将表现出明显的天花板效应,但通过增加额外的 HOOS 问题来扩展 HOOS,JR,可以创建一个响应式 PRO 平台。

研究设计

队列研究(诊断);证据水平,2 级。

方法

使用 304 例接受髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)的患者的术前和术后 HOOS 反应,确定了额外的项目来扩展 HOOS,JR。然后,将新创建的 PRO 工具(HOOS)的心理测量特性与针对髋 OA 患者和/或接受 THA 的患者开发的其他 PRO 工具进行比较。

结果

通过增加 2 个额外的问题来扩展 HOOS,JR,HOOS 比所有其他包含的 PRO 工具更具响应性,并且术后得分的最大值明显低于 HOOS,JR(P<0.0001)、HOOS-Physical Function Short form(P<0.0001)、Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index(P=0.02)、University of California,Los Angeles activity scale(P=0.0002)和改良 Harris Hip Score(P=0.04)。与患者达到可接受症状状态(PASS)相关的术后 HOOS 评分阈值为 62.5。

结论

HOOS 是 PAO 后的一种有效且响应灵敏的 PRO 工具,可能为骨科界提供一种可在髋关节相关亚专科中使用的 PRO 平台。对于接受 PAO 的患者,术后 HOOS 评分≥62.5 与患者达到 PASS 相关。