Suppr超能文献

检查丹麦国家出生队列中母婴随访的不参与情况。

Examining Nonparticipation in the Maternal Follow-up Within the Danish National Birth Cohort.

机构信息

Odense Patient Data Explorative Network.

Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Jul 1;187(7):1511-1519. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy002.

Abstract

A follow-up questionnaire on maternal health was distributed within the Danish National Birth Cohort (established in 1996-2002) 14 years after the index birth. Responses were obtained from 41,466 (53.2%) of 78,010 eligible mothers. To ensure the appropriate use of these data, the possibility of selection bias due to nonparticipation had to be evaluated. We estimated 4 selected exposure-outcome associations (prepregnancy weight-depression; exercise-degenerative musculoskeletal conditions; smoking-heart disease; and alcohol consumption-breast cancer). We adjusted for several factors associated with participation and applied inverse probability weighting. To estimate the degree of selection bias, we calculated relative odds ratios for the relationship between the baseline cohort and the subset participating in the Maternal Follow-up. Participating women were generally healthier, of higher social status, and older than the baseline cohort. However, selection bias in the chosen scenarios was limited; ratios of the odds ratios ranged from -14% to 5% after adjustment for age, parity, social status, and, if the variable was not the exposure variable, prepregnancy body mass index, exercise, smoking, and alcohol consumption. Applying inverse probability weighting did not further reduce bias. In conclusion, while participants differed somewhat from the baseline cohort, selection bias was limited after factors associated with participation status were accounted for.

摘要

丹麦全国出生队列(1996-2002 年建立)在指数分娩 14 年后,分发了一份关于产妇健康的随访问卷。从 78010 名符合条件的母亲中,获得了 41466 名(53.2%)母亲的回复。为了确保这些数据的合理使用,必须评估由于未参与而导致选择偏差的可能性。我们估计了 4 种选择暴露-结局关联(孕前体重-抑郁;运动-退行性肌肉骨骼疾病;吸烟-心脏病;以及饮酒-乳腺癌)。我们调整了与参与相关的几个因素,并应用了逆概率加权。为了估计选择偏差的程度,我们计算了基线队列与参与母婴随访的亚组之间关系的相对优势比。参与的女性通常更健康、社会地位更高、年龄更大,而基线队列则不然。然而,在选择的情况下,选择偏差是有限的;经过年龄、产次、社会地位以及,如果该变量不是暴露变量,则调整孕前体重指数、运动、吸烟和饮酒后,比值的比值范围从 -14%到 5%。应用逆概率加权并不能进一步减少偏差。总之,虽然参与者与基线队列略有不同,但在考虑到与参与状况相关的因素后,选择偏差是有限的。

相似文献

4
Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias?队列研究中的低参与率会导致偏差吗?
Epidemiology. 2006 Jul;17(4):413-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000220549.14177.60.
5
How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies.如何在队列研究中调查和调整选择偏倚。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Apr;97(4):407-416. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13319. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Obesity and anxiety during pregnancy and postpartum: A systematic review.孕期和产后肥胖与焦虑:系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Nov 1;186:293-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.054. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
10
Obesity as a risk factor for sciatica: a meta-analysis.肥胖作为坐骨神经痛的一个风险因素:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr 15;179(8):929-37. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu007. Epub 2014 Feb 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验