• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

追求个人热情:以学习者为中心的研究指导

Pursuing Personal Passion: Learner-Centered Research Mentoring.

作者信息

Phillips William R

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Fam Med. 2018 Jan;50(1):41-46. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.952474.

DOI:10.22454/FamMed.2018.952474
PMID:29346703
Abstract

New researchers often face difficulty finding and focusing research questions. I describe a new tool for research mentoring, the Pursuing Personal Passion (P3) interview, and a systematic approach to help learners organize their curiosity and develop researchable questions aligned with their personal and professional priorities. The learner-centered P3 research interview parallels the patient-centered clinical interview. This paper reviews experience with 27 research mentees over the years 2009 to 2016, using the P3 approach to identify their initial research topics, classify their underlying passions and track the evolution into their final research questions. These researchers usually identified one of three personal passions that provided lenses to focus their research: problem, person, or process. Initial research topics focused on: problem (24%, 6), person (48%, 12) and process (28%, 7). Final research questions evolved into: problem (20%, 5), person (32%, 8) and process (48%, 12). Identification of the underlying passion can lead researchers who start with one general topic to develop it into very different research questions. Using this P3 approach, mentors can help new researchers focus their interests into researchable questions, successful studies, and organized programs of scholarship.

摘要

新的研究人员在寻找并聚焦研究问题时常常面临困难。我介绍一种新的研究指导工具——追求个人热情(P3)访谈,以及一种系统的方法,以帮助学习者梳理他们的好奇心,并提出与个人和职业优先事项相符的可研究问题。以学习者为中心的P3研究访谈与以患者为中心的临床访谈类似。本文回顾了2009年至2016年期间对27名研究学员的指导经验,运用P3方法来确定他们最初的研究主题,归类其潜在热情,并追踪其最终研究问题的演变。这些研究人员通常确定了三种个人热情之一,这些热情为他们聚焦研究提供了视角:问题、人或过程。最初的研究主题集中在:问题(24%,6个)、人(48%,12个)和过程(28%,7个)。最终的研究问题演变为:问题(20%,5个)、人(32%,8个)和过程(48%,12个)。识别潜在热情可以引导从一个宽泛主题起步的研究人员将其发展为截然不同的研究问题。运用这种P3方法,导师可以帮助新研究人员将他们的兴趣聚焦为可研究的问题、成功的研究以及有组织的学术项目。

相似文献

1
Pursuing Personal Passion: Learner-Centered Research Mentoring.追求个人热情:以学习者为中心的研究指导
Fam Med. 2018 Jan;50(1):41-46. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.952474.
2
What Mentors Tell Us About Acknowledging Effort and Sustaining Academic Research Mentoring: A Qualitative Study.导师告诉我们的关于认可努力与维持学术研究指导的内容:一项定性研究
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2019 Winter;39(1):29-35. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000234.
3
Mentoring needs of dietitians: the mentoring self-management program model.营养师的指导需求:指导自我管理项目模式
J Am Diet Assoc. 1991 Apr;91(4):454-8.
4
Successes and Challenges of HIV Mentoring in Malawi: The Mentee Perspective.马拉维艾滋病指导项目的成功与挑战:受指导者视角
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 28;11(6):e0158258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158258. eCollection 2016.
5
The learning experiences of mentees and mentors in a nursing school's mentoring programme.护理学校指导项目中 mentees 和 mentors 的学习经历。 (备注:mentee 可译为“学员”“受指导者”等;mentor 可译为“导师”“指导者”等,这里保留英文未翻译,因为不清楚具体语境下更合适的中文表述。)
Curationis. 2015 Mar 24;38(1):1145. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v38i1.1145.
6
[Structuring and supporting specialist training in general practice: Evaluation of a Hesse-wide mentoring program for doctors].[构建与支持全科医学专业培训:黑森州医生指导计划评估]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Nov;137-138:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
7
Career Development Institute with Enhanced Mentoring: A Revisit.加强指导的职业发展研究所:再探讨
Acad Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;40(3):424-8. doi: 10.1007/s40596-015-0362-5. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
8
"A good career choice for women": female medical students' mentoring experiences: a multi-institutional qualitative study.“适合女性的好职业选择”:女医学生的导师经历:一项多机构定性研究。
Acad Med. 2013 Apr;88(4):527-34. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828578bb.
9
A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the effects and experience of mentoring in eating disorders and disordered eating.饮食失调和紊乱饮食中指导作用及体验的系统评价与元综合分析
Eat Behav. 2016 Apr;21:66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.12.004. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
10
Quebec College of Family Physicians' new formal mentorship program.魁北克家庭医生学院新的正式指导计划。
Can Fam Physician. 2019 Nov;65(11):e481-e486.

引用本文的文献

1
Intersectional Mentorship in Academic Medicine: A Conceptual Review.学术医学中的交叉指导:概念性综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 19;21(4):503. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040503.
2
Teachers' and students' perspectives on the needs of community practice teachers: a cross-sectional study.教师和学生对社区实践教师需求的看法:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 30;23(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04456-1.
3
Publicatus Interruptus: An Endemic Syndrome Disabling Research and Researchers.出版中断:一种使研究及研究人员陷入困境的地方病综合征
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(7):1774-1776. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07291-6. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
4
Mentoring New and Early-Stage Investigators and Underrepresented Minority Faculty for Research Success in Health-Related Fields: An Integrative Literature Review (2010-2020).指导新的和处于早期阶段的研究人员和代表性不足的少数族裔教师进行与健康相关领域的研究成功:综合文献回顾(2010-2020 年)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;18(2):432. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020432.
5
The world needs our science: broadening the research pipeline in anesthesiology.世界需要我们的科学:拓宽麻醉学研究管道。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Feb;46(2):164-168. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102029. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
6
Getting started in research, redefined: five questions for clinically focused physicians in family medicine.重新定义研究入门:面向以临床为重点的家庭医学医生的五个问题。
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 9;7(2):e000017. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000017. eCollection 2019.
7
Learner-centred research mentoring in academic family medicine.学术家庭医学中以学习者为中心的研究指导
Can Fam Physician. 2018 Mar;64(3):169.