• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从医疗保健到战争再到相反:我们应该如何规范两用神经技术?

From Healthcare to Warfare and Reverse: How Should We Regulate Dual-Use Neurotechnology?

机构信息

Institute for Biomedical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology (HEST), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Institute for Biomedical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

出版信息

Neuron. 2018 Jan 17;97(2):269-274. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.017.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.017
PMID:29346750
Abstract

Recent advances in military-funded neurotechnology and novel opportunities for misusing neurodevices show that the problem of dual use is inherent to neuroscience. This paper discusses how the neuroscience community should respond to these dilemmas and delineates a neuroscience-specific biosecurity framework. This neurosecurity framework involves calibrated regulation, (neuro)ethical guidelines, and awareness-raising activities within the scientific community.

摘要

近年来,军事资助的神经技术取得了进展,神经设备被滥用的新机会也出现了,这表明两用问题是神经科学固有的。本文讨论了神经科学界应如何应对这些困境,并描绘了一个特定于神经科学的生物安全框架。这个神经安全框架涉及到在科学界内部进行校准的监管、(神经)伦理准则和提高认识活动。

相似文献

1
From Healthcare to Warfare and Reverse: How Should We Regulate Dual-Use Neurotechnology?从医疗保健到战争再到相反:我们应该如何规范两用神经技术?
Neuron. 2018 Jan 17;97(2):269-274. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.017.
2
Neurotechnology and Society: Strengthening Responsible Innovation in Brain Science.神经科技与社会:强化脑科学的负责任创新
Neuron. 2016 Nov 2;92(3):642-646. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.053.
3
Toward an operational neuroethical risk analysis and mitigation paradigm for emerging neuroscience and technology (neuroS/T).迈向新兴神经科学与技术(neuroS/T)的操作性神经伦理风险分析与缓解范式。
Exp Neurol. 2017 Jan;287(Pt 4):492-495. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
4
Introduction of Novel Medical Devices in Surgery: Ethical Challenges of Current Oversight and Regulation.外科新型医疗器械的引入:当前监督与监管面临的伦理挑战
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Oct;225(4):558-565. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.07.1068. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
5
Neuroscience, ethics, and national security: the state of the art.神经科学、伦理学和国家安全:最新进展。
PLoS Biol. 2012;10(3):e1001289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001289. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
6
Ethical practice under fire: deployed physicians in the global war on terrorism.遭受抨击的道德实践:参与反恐全球战争的现役医生
Mil Med. 2009 May;174(5):441-7. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-01-5208.
7
The prospects for neuro-exceptionalism: transparent lies, naked minds.神经例外论的前景:透明的谎言,赤裸的心灵。
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Jan;8(1):3-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160701828576.
8
Dual use and the "moral taint" problem.两用性与“道德污点”问题。
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Spring;5(2):52-3; discussion W5. doi: 10.1080/15265160590961013.
9
RE: Ethical practice under fire: deployed physicians in the global war on terrorism, published in [Mil Med 2009; 174(5): 441-7].主题:遭受抨击的道德实践:参与全球反恐战争的现役医生,发表于[《军事医学》2009年;174(5):441 - 447]。
Mil Med. 2010 Sep;175(9):xii.
10
RE: Ethical practice under fire: deployed physicians in the global war on terrorism, published in [Mil med 2009; 174(5): 441-7].主题:战火下的道德实践:在全球反恐战争中服役的医生,发表于[《军事医学》2009年;174(5):441 - 447]。
Mil Med. 2010 Sep;175(9):xii-xiii; author reply xiv.

引用本文的文献

1
"In the spectrum of people who are healthy": Views of individuals at risk of dementia on using neurotechnology for cognitive enhancement.“在健康人群范围内”:有患痴呆症风险的个体对使用神经技术进行认知增强的看法。
Neuroethics. 2024 Jul;17(2). doi: 10.1007/s12152-024-09557-2. Epub 2024 May 8.
2
Neuroethical considerations and attitudes about neurostimulation as a fatigue countermeasure among emergency responders.关于神经刺激作为应急响应人员疲劳应对措施的神经伦理考量与态度。
Front Neuroergon. 2024 Dec 18;5:1491941. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2024.1491941. eCollection 2024.
3
Pioneering neurohackers: between egocentric human enhancement and altruistic sacrifice.
开创性的神经黑客:在以自我为中心的人类增强与利他主义牺牲之间
Front Neurosci. 2023 Oct 25;17:1188066. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1188066. eCollection 2023.
4
A comparative review on neuroethical issues in neuroscientific and neuroethical journals.神经科学与神经伦理学期刊中神经伦理问题的比较综述。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Sep 14;17:1160611. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1160611. eCollection 2023.
5
Advocating for neurodata privacy and neurotechnology regulation.倡导神经数据隐私和神经技术监管。
Nat Protoc. 2023 Oct;18(10):2869-2875. doi: 10.1038/s41596-023-00873-0. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
6
The present and future of neural interfaces.神经接口的现状与未来。
Front Neurorobot. 2022 Oct 11;16:953968. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.953968. eCollection 2022.
7
Neuroenhancements in the Military: A Mixed-Method Pilot Study on Attitudes of Staff Officers to Ethics and Rules.军事领域中的神经增强:一项关于参谋人员对伦理与规则态度的混合方法试点研究
Neuroethics. 2022;15(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s12152-022-09490-2. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
8
Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies.神经技术负责任开发与应用的建议。
Neuroethics. 2021;14(3):365-386. doi: 10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
9
Brain leaks and consumer neurotechnology.大脑泄漏与消费神经技术。
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Sep 6;36(9):805-810. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4240.