• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies.神经技术负责任开发与应用的建议。
Neuroethics. 2021;14(3):365-386. doi: 10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
2
On pharmacological neuroenhancement as part of the new neurorights' pioneering legislation in Chile: a perspective.关于智利新的神经权利开创性立法中的药理学神经增强:一种观点。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 18;14:1177720. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177720. eCollection 2023.
3
Neurorights: The Debate About New Legal Safeguards to Protect the Mind.神经权利:关于保护心智的新型法律保障措施的辩论。
Issues Law Med. 2022 Spring;37(1):95-114.
4
Neuroethics of Neuromodulation: An Update.神经调节的神经伦理学:最新进展
Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2018 Dec;8:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cobme.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
5
Minding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of 'Neurorights'.关注权利:勾勒“神经权利”的伦理与法律基础
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2023 May 15:1-21. doi: 10.1017/S0963180123000245.
6
Neuroethics Inside and Out: A Comparative Survey of Neural Device Industry Representatives and the General Public on Ethical Issues and Principles in Neurotechnology.神经伦理学的内外:神经设备行业代表和普通公众对神经技术伦理问题和原则的比较调查。
AJOB Neurosci. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):44-54. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2021.1896596. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
7
[Neurotechnologies and neurorights: mental privacy.].[神经技术与神经权利:精神隐私。]
Recenti Prog Med. 2021 May;112(5):343-346. doi: 10.1701/3608.35871.
8
Neurotechnology and international security: .神经技术与国际安全: 。
Politics Life Sci. 2023 Apr;42(1):81-103. doi: 10.1017/pls.2022.2.
9
Applying the IEEE BRAIN neuroethics framework to intra-cortical brain-computer interfaces.将 IEEE BRAIN 神经伦理学框架应用于皮质内脑机接口。
J Neural Eng. 2024 Apr 4;21(2). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad3852.
10
Qualitative studies involving users of clinical neurotechnology: a scoping review.涉及临床神经技术使用者的定性研究:范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Aug 14;25(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01087-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Privacy in perspective: research participants' priorities and concerns related to sharing data generated in human neuroscience studies.透视隐私:研究参与者对于人类神经科学研究中产生的数据共享的优先事项和担忧。
Neuroethics. 2025 Aug;18(2). doi: 10.1007/s12152-025-09609-1. Epub 2025 Aug 4.
2
Demystifying the likelihood of reidentification in neuroimaging data: A technical and regulatory analysis.揭开神经影像数据中重新识别可能性的神秘面纱:一项技术与监管分析。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Mar 22;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00111. eCollection 2024.
3
Exploring the intersection of brain-computer interfaces and traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine.探索脑机接口与传统医学、补充医学和整合医学的交叉领域。
Integr Med Res. 2025 Jun;14(2):101142. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2025.101142. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
4
Regulating neural data processing in the age of BCIs: Ethical concerns and legal approaches.脑机接口时代对神经数据处理的规范:伦理考量与法律途径
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 28;11:20552076251326123. doi: 10.1177/20552076251326123. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Recent applications of EEG-based brain-computer-interface in the medical field.基于脑电图的脑机接口在医学领域的最新应用。
Mil Med Res. 2025 Mar 24;12(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40779-025-00598-z.
6
Semantic language decoding across participants and stimulus modalities.跨参与者和刺激模态的语义语言解码。
Curr Biol. 2025 Mar 10;35(5):1023-1032.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.01.024. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
7
Neuroethical considerations and attitudes about neurostimulation as a fatigue countermeasure among emergency responders.关于神经刺激作为应急响应人员疲劳应对措施的神经伦理考量与态度。
Front Neuroergon. 2024 Dec 18;5:1491941. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2024.1491941. eCollection 2024.
8
Electroencephalography-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces in Rehabilitation: A Bibliometric Analysis (2013-2023).基于脑电图的脑机接口在康复中的应用:文献计量分析(2013-2023 年)。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Nov 6;24(22):7125. doi: 10.3390/s24227125.
9
Neuroplasticity as a Foundation for Decision-Making in Space.神经可塑性作为空间决策的基础。
NeuroSci. 2022 Aug 9;3(3):457-475. doi: 10.3390/neurosci3030033. eCollection 2022 Sep.
10
Neuroethics and AI ethics: a proposal for collaboration.神经伦理学与人工智能伦理学:合作建议。
BMC Neurosci. 2024 Aug 29;25(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12868-024-00888-7.

本文引用的文献

1
High-performance brain-to-text communication via handwriting.通过手写实现高性能的脑-文本通信。
Nature. 2021 May;593(7858):249-254. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03506-2. Epub 2021 May 12.
2
Towards an antiracist (neuro)science.迈向反种族主义(神经)科学。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 May;5(5):540-541. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01075-y.
3
Privacy Challenges to the Democratization of Brain Data.脑数据民主化面临的隐私挑战
iScience. 2020 Jun 26;23(6):101134. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101134. Epub 2020 May 5.
4
Multiclass covert speech classification using extreme learning machine.基于极限学习机的多类别隐蔽语音分类
Biomed Eng Lett. 2020 Mar 3;10(2):217-226. doi: 10.1007/s13534-020-00152-x. eCollection 2020 May.
5
Multi-Person Brain-To-Brain Interfaces: Ethical Issues.多人脑对脑接口:伦理问题。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Nov 5;13:1177. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01177. eCollection 2019.
6
Brain-computer interface (BCI) researcher perspectives on neural data ownership and privacy.脑机接口(BCI)研究人员对神经数据所有权和隐私的看法。
J Neural Eng. 2020 Jan 28;17(1):016039. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab5b7f.
7
Dimensions of Ethical Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies.面向消费者的神经技术的伦理维度。
AJOB Neurosci. 2019 Oct-Dec;10(4):152-166. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2019.1665120.
8
Fornix-Region Deep Brain Stimulation-Induced Memory Flashbacks in Alzheimer's Disease.穹窿区深部脑刺激诱发阿尔茨海默病的记忆闪回
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 22;381(8):783-785. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1905240.
9
Biomarkers for PTSD Susceptibility and Resilience, Ethical Issues.创伤后应激障碍易感性和恢复力的生物标志物,伦理问题。
AJOB Neurosci. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):122-124. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2019.1632964.
10
Tissue Response to Neural Implants: The Use of Model Systems Toward New Design Solutions of Implantable Microelectrodes.组织对神经植入物的反应:利用模型系统寻求可植入微电极的新设计解决方案
Front Neurosci. 2019 Jul 5;13:689. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00689. eCollection 2019.

神经技术负责任开发与应用的建议。

Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies.

作者信息

Goering Sara, Klein Eran, Specker Sullivan Laura, Wexler Anna, Agüera Y Arcas Blaise, Bi Guoqiang, Carmena Jose M, Fins Joseph J, Friesen Phoebe, Gallant Jack, Huggins Jane E, Kellmeyer Philipp, Marblestone Adam, Mitchell Christine, Parens Erik, Pham Michelle, Rubel Alan, Sadato Norihiro, Teicher Mina, Wasserman David, Whittaker Meredith, Wolpaw Jonathan, Yuste Rafael

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR USA.

出版信息

Neuroethics. 2021;14(3):365-386. doi: 10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6
PMID:33942016
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8081770/
Abstract

Advancements in novel neurotechnologies, such as brain computer interfaces (BCI) and neuromodulatory devices such as deep brain stimulators (DBS), will have profound implications for society and human rights. While these technologies are improving the diagnosis and treatment of mental and neurological diseases, they can also alter individual agency and estrange those using neurotechnologies from their sense of self, challenging basic notions of what it means to be human. As an international coalition of interdisciplinary scholars and practitioners, we examine these challenges and make recommendations to mitigate negative consequences that could arise from the unregulated development or application of novel neurotechnologies. We explore potential ethical challenges in four key areas: identity and agency, privacy, bias, and enhancement. To address them, we propose (1) democratic and inclusive summits to establish globally-coordinated ethical and societal guidelines for neurotechnology development and application, (2) new measures, including "Neurorights," for data privacy, security, and consent to empower neurotechnology users' control over their data, (3) new methods of identifying and preventing bias, and (4) the adoption of public guidelines for safe and equitable distribution of neurotechnological devices.

摘要

新型神经技术的进步,如脑机接口(BCI)以及深部脑刺激器(DBS)等神经调节设备,将对社会和人权产生深远影响。虽然这些技术正在改善精神和神经疾病的诊断与治疗,但它们也可能改变个体能动性,并使使用神经技术的人与其自我认知相疏离,对“人意味着什么”的基本观念构成挑战。作为一个跨学科的学者和从业者国际联盟,我们审视这些挑战,并提出建议以减轻新型神经技术无节制发展或应用可能产生的负面后果。我们探讨四个关键领域的潜在伦理挑战:身份与能动性、隐私、偏见和增强。为应对这些挑战,我们提议:(1)召开民主且包容的峰会,为神经技术的开发和应用制定全球协调的伦理和社会准则;(2)采取新措施,包括“神经权利”,以保障数据隐私、安全和同意权,增强神经技术使用者对其数据的控制权;(3)采用识别和预防偏见的新方法;(4)通过关于神经技术设备安全和公平分配的公共准则。