Suppr超能文献

基于功率投影法的序贯概率比检验改善了脑机接口的决策制定。

Sequential Probability Ratio Testing with Power Projective Base Method Improves Decision-Making for BCI.

作者信息

Liu Rong, Wang Yongxuan, Wu Xinyu, Cheng Jun

机构信息

Biomedical Engineering Department, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China.

Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, Liaoning 116001, China.

出版信息

Comput Math Methods Med. 2017;2017:2948742. doi: 10.1155/2017/2948742. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

Abstract

Obtaining a fast and reliable decision is an important issue in brain-computer interfaces (BCI), particularly in practical real-time applications such as wheelchair or neuroprosthetic control. In this study, the EEG signals were firstly analyzed with a power projective base method. Then we were applied a decision-making model, the sequential probability ratio testing (SPRT), for single-trial classification of motor imagery movement events. The unique strength of this proposed classification method lies in its accumulative process, which increases the discriminative power as more and more evidence is observed over time. The properties of the method were illustrated on thirteen subjects' recordings from three datasets. Results showed that our proposed power projective method outperformed two benchmark methods for every subject. Moreover, with sequential classifier, the accuracies across subjects were significantly higher than that with nonsequential ones. The average maximum accuracy of the SPRT method was 84.1%, as compared with 82.3% accuracy for the sequential Bayesian (SB) method. The proposed SPRT method provides an explicit relationship between stopping time, thresholds, and error, which is important for balancing the time-accuracy trade-off. These results suggest SPRT would be useful in speeding up decision-making while trading off errors in BCI.

摘要

在脑机接口(BCI)中,尤其是在诸如轮椅控制或神经假肢控制等实际实时应用中,快速获得可靠的决策是一个重要问题。在本研究中,首先使用功率投影基方法对脑电图(EEG)信号进行分析。然后,我们应用了一种决策模型——序贯概率比检验(SPRT),用于对运动想象运动事件进行单次试验分类。这种提出的分类方法的独特优势在于其累积过程,随着时间的推移观察到越来越多的证据,其判别能力会增强。该方法的特性在来自三个数据集的13名受试者的记录上得到了说明。结果表明,我们提出的功率投影方法在每个受试者上都优于两种基准方法。此外,使用序贯分类器时,受试者的准确率显著高于使用非序贯分类器时。SPRT方法的平均最大准确率为84.1%,而序贯贝叶斯(SB)方法的准确率为82.3%。所提出的SPRT方法提供了停止时间、阈值和误差之间的明确关系,这对于平衡时间-准确率权衡很重要。这些结果表明,SPRT在加快BCI决策速度同时权衡误差方面将是有用的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed78/5734001/17de6d465c58/CMMM2017-2948742.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验