Wu Hai-Hao, Tang Tao, Pang Qing-Jiang, Wang Yun, Zhang Zong-Kai
Department of Orthopaedics, Ningbo NO.2 Hospital, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang, China;
Department of Orthopaedics, Ningbo NO.2 Hospital, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 Feb 25;30(2):110-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.02.004.
To assess the effect of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) combined with epidural injection for prolapsed lumbar disc herniation(PLDH).
In this prospective randomized controlled study, the clinical data of 126 patients who had undergone a PELD because of a single-level PLDH from March 2014 to June 2015 were analyzed. There were 67 males and 59 females, ranging in age from 17 to 75 years old with an average of(41.0±13.5) years old, 9 cases were L₃,₄, 76 cases were L₄,₅ and 41 cases were L₅S₁. According to the random number table, the patients were randomized into two groups, with 63 patients in each group. Patients in group 1 were injected normal saline after PLED, patients in group 2 were subjected to an epidural injection of Diprospan, Lidocaine and Mecobalamine after PLED. All the patients were followed up from 6 to 20 months with the mean of 12.4 months. Complications, the postoperative hospital stay, the period of return to work, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score were compared between two groups, and clinical outcomes were evaluated according to modified MacNab criteria.
All the operations were successful, and no complications were found. The mean postoperative hospital stay and the period of return to work in group 1 were (4.61±1.25) days and (4.31±0.47) weeks, respectively, and in group 2 were (2.53±0.69) days and (3.14±0.52) weeks, there was significant differences between two groups(=0.000). Postoperative VAS and JOA scores in two groups were obviously improved (=0.000). At 1 day, 1 week, 1 month after operation, VAS, JOA scores in group 2 were better than that of group 1(=0.000), and after 6 months, there was no significant difference between two groups(>0.05). According to the modified MacNab criteria, 39 cases got excellent results, 21 good, 3 fair in group 1, and which in group 2 were 41, 20, 2, respectively, there was no significant difference between two groups(=0.087).
PELD is an mini-invasive technique for PLDH, it can fleetly reduce pain and improve function. And combination with epidural injection has the advantages of pain releasing and function improving in the short-term postoperative period, and it can decrease postoperative hospital stay and time of returning to work, and it is a safe and effective method.
评估经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)联合硬膜外注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症(PLDH)的效果。
在这项前瞻性随机对照研究中,分析了2014年3月至2015年6月因单节段PLDH接受PELD治疗的126例患者的临床资料。其中男性67例,女性59例,年龄17至75岁,平均(41.0±13.5)岁,L₃₄节段9例,L₄₅节段76例,L₅S₁节段41例。根据随机数字表,将患者随机分为两组,每组63例。第1组患者在PELD术后注射生理盐水,第2组患者在PELD术后进行得宝松、利多卡因和甲钴胺硬膜外注射。所有患者随访6至20个月,平均12.个月。比较两组患者的并发症、术后住院时间、恢复工作时间、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和日本骨科协会(JOA)评分,并根据改良MacNab标准评估临床疗效。
所有手术均成功,未发现并发症。第1组患者术后平均住院时间和恢复工作时间分别为(4.61±1.25)天和(4.31±0.47)周,第2组分别为(2.53±0.69)天和(3.14±0.52)周,两组间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.000)。两组患者术后VAS和JOA评分均明显改善(P = 0.000)。术后1天、1周、1个月时,第2组患者的VAS、JOA评分均优于第1组(P = 0.000),术后6个月时,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。根据改良MacNab标准,第1组优39例,良21例,可3例,第2组分别为41例、20例、2例,两组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.087)。
PELD是治疗PLDH的一种微创手术,能迅速减轻疼痛、改善功能。联合硬膜外注射在术后短期内具有缓解疼痛、改善功能的优势,可缩短术后住院时间和恢复工作时间,是一种安全有效的方法。