Emerg Infect Dis. 2018 Feb;24(2):311-319. doi: 10.3201/eid2402.171018.
We compared children who were positive for Ebola virus disease (EVD) with those who were negative to derive a pediatric EVD predictor (PEP) score. We collected data on all children <13 years of age admitted to 11 Ebola holding units in Sierra Leone during August 2014-March 2015 and performed multivariable logistic regression. Among 1,054 children, 309 (29%) were EVD positive and 697 (66%) EVD negative, with 48 (5%) missing. Contact history, conjunctivitis, and age were the strongest positive predictors for EVD. The PEP score had an area under receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.80. A PEP score of 7/10 was 92% specific and 44% sensitive; 3/10 was 30% specific, 94% sensitive. The PEP score could correctly classify 79%-90% of children and could be used to facilitate triage into risk categories, depending on the sensitivity or specificity required.
我们比较了埃博拉病毒病(EVD)阳性和阴性的儿童,以得出儿科 EVD 预测器(PEP)评分。我们收集了 2014 年 8 月至 2015 年 3 月期间塞拉利昂 11 个埃博拉隔离区收治的所有<13 岁儿童的数据,并进行了多变量逻辑回归分析。在 1054 名儿童中,309 名(29%)EVD 阳性,697 名(66%)EVD 阴性,48 名(5%)缺失。接触史、结膜炎和年龄是 EVD 的最强阳性预测因素。PEP 评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.80。PEP 评分 7/10 时特异性为 92%,敏感性为 44%;3/10 时特异性为 30%,敏感性为 94%。PEP 评分可正确分类 79%-90%的儿童,可根据所需的敏感性或特异性,用于将儿童分诊到风险类别。