• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[复杂创伤后应激障碍筛查(SkPTBS)修订版的验证]

[Validation of the Screening for Complex PTSD (SkPTBS) - Revision].

作者信息

Dorr Florence, Sack Martin, Bengel Jürgen

机构信息

Institut für Psychologie, Abteilung für Rehabilitationspsychologie und Psychotherapie, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.

Klinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München.

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2018 Dec;68(12):525-533. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-122942. Epub 2018 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-122942
PMID:29351709
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim was to develop further a screening instrument for complex posttraumatic stress disorder (cPTSD). The screening for cPTSD (SkPTBS) tests a) potential traumatic experiences, b) influential features and risk factors, and c) symptoms of cPTSD. The SkPTBS by Dorr et al. (2016) was revised according to the current ICD-11 criteria set proposal for cPTSD and is explored in its revised edition.

METHOD

Impacts of long-lasting interpersonal trauma were tested in inpatients of psychosomatic rehabilitation and in patients consulting a university outpatient center for trauma therapy. Patients filled out the screening at the beginning of their treatment (N=525, among these n=359 rehabilitation patients and n=157 in the outpatient center, mean age 48 years, 68% female). Later diagnosed complex PTSD as well as results of the SCID and the Interview for complex PTSD (IkPTBS) served as primary validation criteria.

RESULTS

88 patients (17%) were diagnosed with complex PTSD. Metric SkPTBS items were selective and the scale had an internal reliability of Cronbachs α=0.91. The one-dimensional factor structure was replicated. SkPTBS correlated moderately with posttraumatic symptoms measured by IES-15, with dissociative symptoms (DES-Taxon), depressive symptoms (in BDI-II, PHQ-9), and global symptom severity (in SCL-90-R). Finally, norms for different groups of age, diagnosis and treatment settings were developed.

CONCLUSION

The SkPTBS revision is a feasible and brief instrument to identify patients at risk for complex PTSD. It is provided freely and can be applied for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.

摘要

背景

目的是进一步开发一种用于复杂创伤后应激障碍(cPTSD)的筛查工具。复杂创伤后应激障碍筛查量表(SkPTBS)测试:a)潜在创伤经历;b)影响因素和风险因素;c)复杂创伤后应激障碍的症状。Dorr等人(2016年)编制的SkPTBS根据国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)目前关于复杂创伤后应激障碍的标准提案进行了修订,并对其修订版进行了研究。

方法

在身心康复住院患者和咨询大学门诊创伤治疗中心的患者中测试长期人际创伤的影响。患者在治疗开始时填写筛查量表(N = 525,其中n = 359名康复患者,n = 157名门诊患者,平均年龄48岁,68%为女性)。后来诊断出的复杂创伤后应激障碍以及结构化临床访谈(SCID)和复杂创伤后应激障碍访谈(IkPTBS)的结果作为主要验证标准。

结果

88名患者(17%)被诊断为复杂创伤后应激障碍。SkPTBS的计量项目具有选择性,该量表的内部信度为Cronbach's α = 0.91。重复了一维因素结构。SkPTBS与IES-15测量的创伤后症状、分离症状(DES分类)、抑郁症状(BDI-II、PHQ-9)以及总体症状严重程度(SCL-90-R)中度相关。最后,制定了不同年龄、诊断和治疗环境组的常模。

结论

SkPTBS修订版是一种可行且简短的工具,可用于识别有复杂创伤后应激障碍风险的患者。它是免费提供的,可用于诊断和治疗目的。

相似文献

1
[Validation of the Screening for Complex PTSD (SkPTBS) - Revision].[复杂创伤后应激障碍筛查(SkPTBS)修订版的验证]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2018 Dec;68(12):525-533. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-122942. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
2
[Development and Validation of a Screening Instrument for Complex PTSD].[复杂性创伤后应激障碍筛查工具的开发与验证]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2016 Nov;66(11):441-448. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-109403. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
3
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in DSM-5 and ICD-11: Clinical and Behavioral Correlates.DSM-5 和 ICD-11 中的创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍:临床和行为相关性。
J Trauma Stress. 2018 Apr;31(2):174-180. doi: 10.1002/jts.22272. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
4
Variation in post-traumatic response: the role of trauma type in predicting ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD symptoms.创伤后反应的差异:创伤类型在预测国际疾病分类第11版创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍症状中的作用。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;52(6):727-736. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1350-8. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
5
The child and Adolescent Trauma Screen 2 (CATS-2) - validation of an instrument to measure DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年创伤筛查 2 版(CATS-2)——用于测量儿童和青少年 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍和复杂性创伤后应激障碍的工具的验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Aug 1;13(2):2105580. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2105580. eCollection 2022.
6
Validation of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire.使用国际创伤问卷验证创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Sep;136(3):313-322. doi: 10.1111/acps.12771. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
7
Evidence of distinct profiles of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) based on the new ICD-11 Trauma Questionnaire (ICD-TQ).基于新的国际疾病分类第11版创伤问卷(ICD-TQ)的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)不同特征的证据。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 1;207:181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.032. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
ICD-11 Prevalence Rates of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in a German Nationwide Sample.德国全国样本中创伤后应激障碍和复杂性创伤后应激障碍的国际疾病分类第11版患病率
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2018 Apr;206(4):270-276. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000790.
9
Modeling Patterns of Polyvictimiztion and Their Associations with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the Israeli Population.对以色列人群中创伤后应激障碍和复杂型创伤后应激障碍与多种创伤经历模式之间的关联进行建模。
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Dec;32(6):843-854. doi: 10.1002/jts.22455. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
10
An assessment of the construct validity of the ICD-11 proposal for complex posttraumatic stress disorder.对国际疾病分类第11版中复杂性创伤后应激障碍提案的结构效度评估。
Psychol Trauma. 2017 Jan;9(1):1-9. doi: 10.1037/tra0000114. Epub 2016 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The International Trauma Interview (ITI): development of a semi-structured diagnostic interview and evaluation in a UK sample.国际创伤访谈(ITI):在英国样本中对半结构化诊断访谈的开发与评估
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2494361. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2494361. Epub 2025 May 6.
2
Long-term follow-up of a multimodal day clinic, group-based treatment program for patients with very high risk for complex posttraumatic stress disorder, and for patients with non-complex trauma-related disorders.对一个多模式日间诊所的长期随访,该诊所为复杂性创伤后应激障碍极高风险患者以及非复杂性创伤相关障碍患者提供基于团体的治疗项目。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 15;14:1152486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1152486. eCollection 2023.
3
Predictors of complex PTSD: the role of trauma characteristics, dissociation, and comorbid psychopathology.
复杂性创伤后应激障碍的预测因素:创伤特征、解离及共病精神病理学的作用。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2023 Jan 5;10(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40479-022-00208-7.
4
Psychometric properties of the German version of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) in clinical routine settings: study design and protocol of a multitrait-multimethod study.《用于 DSM-5 的临床医生管理创伤后应激障碍量表(CAPS-5)的德文版在临床常规环境中的心理计量学特性:一项多特质-多方法研究的研究设计和方案》
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 22;10(6):e036078. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036078.
5
Online-group intervention after suicide bereavement through the use of webinars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在线群组干预在自杀丧亲后的应用:一项基于网络研讨会的随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jan 8;21(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3891-5.
6
Symptom burden and work-related impairment among patients with PTSD and complex PTSD.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性创伤后应激障碍患者的症状负担及与工作相关的功能损害
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Nov 27;10(1):1694766. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1694766. eCollection 2019.