Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Aug;27(8):587-592. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006899. Epub 2018 Jan 20.
Urinalysis and urine culture are commonly ordered tests in the emergency department (ED). We evaluated the impact of removal of order sets from the 'frequently ordered test' in the computerised physician order entry system (CPOE) on urine testing practices.
We conducted a before (1 September to 20 October 2015) and after (21 October to 30 November 2015) study of ED patients. The intervention consisted of retaining 'urinalysis with reflex to microscopy' as the only urine test in a highly accessible list of frequently ordered tests in the CPOE system. All other urine tests required use of additional order screens via additional mouse clicks. The frequency of urine testing before and after the intervention was compared, adjusting for temporal trends.
During the study period, 6499 (28.2%) of 22 948 ED patients had ≥1 urine test ordered. Urine testing rates for all ED patients decreased in the post intervention period for urinalysis (291.5 pre intervention vs 278.4 per 1000 ED visits post intervention, P=0.03), urine microscopy (196.5vs179.5, P=0.001) and urine culture (54.3vs29.7, P<0.001). When adjusted for temporal trends, the daily culture rate per 1000 ED visits decreased by 46.6% (-46.6%, 95% CI -66.2% to -15.6%), but urinalysis (0.4%, 95% CI -30.1 to 44.4%), microscopy (-6.5%, 95% CI -36.0% to 36.6%) and catheterised urine culture rates (17.9%, 95% CI -16.9 to 67.4) were unchanged.
A simple intervention of retaining only 'urinalysis with reflex to microscopy' and removing all other urine tests from the 'frequently ordered' window of the ED electronic order set decreased urine cultures ordered by 46.6% after accounting for temporal trends. Given the injudicious use of antimicrobial therapy for asymptomatic bacteriuria, findings from our study suggest that proper design of electronic order sets plays a vital role in reducing excessive ordering of urine cultures.
在急诊科(ED)中,尿液分析和尿液培养通常是常规检查。我们评估了在计算机化医嘱录入系统(CPOE)中从“常规检查”中删除医嘱集对尿液检查实践的影响。
我们对 ED 患者进行了一项前瞻性(2015 年 9 月 1 日至 10 月 20 日)和回顾性(2015 年 10 月 21 日至 11 月 30 日)研究。干预措施包括将“尿液分析加显微镜检查”作为 CPOE 系统中高度便捷的常规检查列表中的唯一尿液检查项目。所有其他尿液检查都需要通过额外的鼠标点击来使用额外的医嘱屏幕。比较干预前后尿液检查的频率,并根据时间趋势进行调整。
在研究期间,22948 名 ED 患者中有 6499 名(28.2%)至少有 1 项尿液检查。在干预后时期,所有 ED 患者的尿液检查率均下降,包括尿液分析(干预前为 291.5 次/1000 次 ED 就诊,干预后为 278.4 次/1000 次 ED 就诊,P=0.03)、尿液显微镜检查(196.5 次/1000 次 ED 就诊 vs 179.5 次/1000 次 ED 就诊,P=0.001)和尿液培养(54.3 次/1000 次 ED 就诊 vs 29.7 次/1000 次 ED 就诊,P<0.001)。在根据时间趋势进行调整后,每日培养率每 1000 次 ED 就诊下降 46.6%(-46.6%,95%CI -66.2%至-15.6%),但尿液分析(0.4%,95%CI -30.1%至 44.4%)、显微镜检查(-6.5%,95%CI -36.0%至 36.6%)和导尿培养率(17.9%,95%CI -16.9%至 67.4%)无变化。
一项简单的干预措施,即保留“尿液分析加显微镜检查”,并将所有其他尿液检查从 ED 电子医嘱集的“常规检查”窗口中删除,在考虑时间趋势后,可使尿液培养的医嘱减少 46.6%。鉴于对无症状菌尿症的抗菌治疗使用不当,我们的研究结果表明,电子医嘱集的正确设计在减少尿液培养的过度开具方面发挥着重要作用。