Chartrand Karine, Lebel Marie-Ève, Tarrab Esther, Savard Pierre, Leclerc Denis, Lamarre Alain
Immunovirology Laboratory, Institut national de la recherche scientifique (INRS), INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Infectious Disease Research Center, Department of Microbiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Front Immunol. 2018 Jan 4;8:1885. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01885. eCollection 2017.
Although vaccination has been an effective way of preventing infections ever since the eighteenth century, the generation of therapeutic vaccines and immunotherapies is still a work in progress. A number of challenges impede the development of these therapeutic approaches such as safety issues related to the administration of whole pathogens whether attenuated or inactivated. One safe alternative to classical vaccination methods gaining recognition is the use of nanoparticles, whether synthetic or naturally derived. We have recently demonstrated that the papaya mosaic virus (PapMV)-like nanoparticle can be used as a prophylactic vaccine against various viral and bacterial infections through the induction of protective humoral and cellular immune responses. Moreover, PapMV is also very efficient when used as an immune adjuvant in an immunotherapeutic setting at slowing down the growth of aggressive mouse melanoma tumors in a type I interferon (IFN-I)-dependent manner. In the present study, we were interested in exploiting the capacity of PapMV of inducing robust IFN-I production as treatment for the chronic viral infection model lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) clone 13 (Cl13). Treatment of LCMV Cl13-infected mice with two systemic administrations of PapMV was ineffective, as shown by the lack of changes in viral titers and immune response to LCMV following treatment. Moreover, IFN-α production following PapMV administration was almost completely abolished in LCMV-infected mice. To better isolate the mechanisms at play, we determined the influence of a pretreatment with PapMV on secondary PapMV administration, therefore eliminating potential variables emanating from the infection. Pretreatment with PapMV led to the same outcome as an LCMV infection in that IFN-α production following secondary PapMV immunization was abrogated for up to 50 days while immune activation was also dramatically impaired. We showed that two distinct and overlapping mechanisms were responsible for this outcome. While short-term inhibition was partially the result of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 degradation, a crucial component of the toll-like receptor 7 signaling pathway, long-term inhibition was mainly due to interference by PapMV-specific antibodies. Thus, we identified a possible pitfall in the use of virus-like particles for the systemic treatment of chronic viral infections and discuss mitigating alternatives to circumvent these potential problems.
自18世纪以来,疫苗接种一直是预防感染的有效方法,但治疗性疫苗和免疫疗法仍在不断发展中。许多挑战阻碍了这些治疗方法的开发,例如与施用减毒或灭活的全病原体相关的安全问题。一种越来越受到认可的传统疫苗接种方法的安全替代方案是使用纳米颗粒,无论是合成的还是天然衍生的。我们最近证明,木瓜花叶病毒(PapMV)样纳米颗粒可通过诱导保护性体液和细胞免疫反应,用作预防各种病毒和细菌感染的疫苗。此外,PapMV在免疫治疗环境中用作免疫佐剂时,也非常有效地以I型干扰素(IFN-I)依赖性方式减缓侵袭性小鼠黑色素瘤肿瘤的生长。在本研究中,我们感兴趣的是利用PapMV诱导强大的IFN-I产生的能力来治疗慢性病毒感染模型淋巴细胞性脉络丛脑膜炎病毒(LCMV)克隆13(Cl13)。用PapMV进行两次全身给药治疗LCMV Cl13感染的小鼠无效,治疗后病毒滴度和对LCMV的免疫反应没有变化就证明了这一点。此外,在LCMV感染的小鼠中,PapMV给药后IFN-α的产生几乎完全被消除。为了更好地分离其中的机制,我们确定了PapMV预处理对二次PapMV给药的影响,从而消除了感染产生的潜在变量。PapMV预处理导致的结果与LCMV感染相同,即二次PapMV免疫后IFN-α的产生在长达50天内被消除,同时免疫激活也受到显著损害。我们表明,有两种不同但重叠的机制导致了这一结果。虽然短期抑制部分是由于白细胞介素-1受体相关激酶1降解,这是Toll样受体7信号通路的一个关键组成部分,但长期抑制主要是由于PapMV特异性抗体的干扰。因此,我们确定了在使用病毒样颗粒全身治疗慢性病毒感染时可能存在的一个陷阱,并讨论了减轻这些潜在问题的替代方案。