Pradère Benjamin, Thibault Constance, Vetterlein Malte W, Leow Jeffrey J, Peyronnet Benoit, Rouprêt Morgan, Seisen Thomas
Department of Urology, CHRU Tours, Faculté de Médecine François Rabelais, Tours, France.
Department of Medical Oncology, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Dec;6(6):1049-1059. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.09.12.
The role of perioperative chemotherapy associated with radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer has been analyzed in several landmark randomized controlled trials (RCTs) over the past decades. With regard to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), a meta-analysis of level 1 evidence and long-term results from the largest RCTs support its use, which is currently advocated as the standard of care by most of the clinical guidelines worldwide. However, with regard to the delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), evidence is more contentious. Specifically, several meta-analyses demonstrated a survival benefit associated with the use of cisplatin-based regimen but investigators identified multiple methodological limitations in most of included RCTs. Nonetheless, AC is currently considered for fit patients with adverse pathological features at RC. It is noteworthy that the delivery of such cytotoxic treatment after surgery may maintain significant anti-tumor activity even in those patients who previously received NAC. Finally, given its greater response rate, the methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin plus cisplatin combination remains preferentially considered in the neoadjuvant setting, while the gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination is more commonly delivered in the adjuvant setting because of its better toxicity profile. However, no prospective evidence comparing efficacy of both regimens for NAC or AC is currently available.
在过去几十年中,多项具有里程碑意义的随机对照试验(RCT)分析了围手术期化疗与根治性膀胱切除术(RC)联合用于肌层浸润性膀胱癌的作用。关于新辅助化疗(NAC),对一级证据和来自最大规模RCT的长期结果进行的荟萃分析支持其应用,目前全球大多数临床指南都将其作为标准治疗方法予以推荐。然而,关于辅助化疗(AC)的应用,证据存在更多争议。具体而言,多项荟萃分析表明,使用基于顺铂的方案可带来生存获益,但研究人员发现大多数纳入的RCT存在多种方法学局限性。尽管如此,目前对于RC术后具有不良病理特征的合适患者会考虑给予AC。值得注意的是,即使是那些先前接受过NAC的患者,术后进行这种细胞毒性治疗仍可能保持显著的抗肿瘤活性。最后,鉴于甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、阿霉素加顺铂联合方案的缓解率更高,在新辅助治疗中仍优先考虑使用,而吉西他滨加顺铂联合方案由于毒性特征更好,在辅助治疗中应用更为普遍。然而,目前尚无比较这两种方案用于NAC或AC疗效的前瞻性证据。