• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理领导力学院项目评估:一项批判性分析。

The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique.

作者信息

Havaei Farinaz, MacPhee Maura

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

J Healthc Leadersh. 2015 Aug 12;7:65-74. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S87892. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.2147/JHL.S87892
PMID:29355180
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5740996/
Abstract

A theory-driven program evaluation was conducted for a nursing leadership program, as a collaborative project between university faculty, the nurses' union, the provincial Ministry of Health, and its chief nursing officers. A collaborative logic model process was used to engage stakeholders, and mixed methods approaches were used to answer evaluation questions. Despite demonstrated, successful outcomes, the leadership program was not supported with continued funding. This paper examines what happened during the evaluation process: What factors failed to sustain this program?

摘要

作为大学教师、护士工会、省级卫生部及其首席护理官之间的合作项目,对一个护理领导力项目进行了理论驱动的项目评估。采用了合作逻辑模型流程来让利益相关者参与其中,并使用混合方法来回答评估问题。尽管该领导力项目取得了显著的成功成果,但却没有获得持续的资金支持。本文探讨了评估过程中发生的情况:哪些因素未能维持该项目?

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b916/5740996/9e46b3bede81/jhl-7-065Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b916/5740996/876e15c16843/jhl-7-065Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b916/5740996/9e46b3bede81/jhl-7-065Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b916/5740996/876e15c16843/jhl-7-065Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b916/5740996/9e46b3bede81/jhl-7-065Fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
The Nursing Leadership Institute program evaluation: a critique.护理领导力学院项目评估:一项批判性分析。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2015 Aug 12;7:65-74. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S87892. eCollection 2015.
2
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
3
Developing leadership in nurse managers: the British Columbia Nursing Leadership Institute.培养护士长的领导力:不列颠哥伦比亚护理领导力学院
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2008;21(3):64-75. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2008.20061.
4
Research to Action: an evaluation.从研究到行动:一项评估
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2012 Mar;25 Spec No 2012:21-32. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2012.22814.
5
Collaborative nursing leadership project in the People's Republic of China.中华人民共和国协作护理领导项目。
Int Nurs Rev. 2010 Jun;57(2):180-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2009.00769.x.
6
Human Resources for Health: Advancing Nursing in Haiti-A Qualitative Evaluation of a Master's Level Nursing Faculty Development Project.卫生人力资源:推进海地的护理事业——一项硕士层次护理师资发展项目的定性评估
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2019;30(1):404-416. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2019.0029.
7
Building the capacity for evidence-based clinical nursing leadership: the role of executive co-coaching and group clinical supervision for quality patient services.培养基于证据的临床护理领导力的能力:执行联合辅导和小组临床督导对优质患者服务的作用。
J Nurs Manag. 2007 Mar;15(2):230-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00750.x.
8
Overview of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars program.罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会护士教师学者项目概述。
Nurs Outlook. 2017 May-Jun;65(3):254-264. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
9
Using collaborative logic analysis evaluation to test the program theory of an intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment for youth with pain-related disability.运用协作逻辑分析评估来检验针对患有疼痛相关残疾的青少年的强化跨学科疼痛治疗的项目理论。
Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2020 Apr 23;2(4):113-130. doi: 10.1002/pne2.12018. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
Collaborative Student Leadership Conference.学生领导力合作会议。
J Prof Nurs. 2016 Sep-Oct;32(5S):S63-S67. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological competence: the key to leader empowering behaviors.心理能力:领导者授权行为的关键。
J Nurs Adm. 2014 May;44(5):276-83. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000067.
2
Testing the effects of an empowerment-based leadership development programme: part 2 - staff outcomes.测试基于赋权的领导力发展计划的效果:第 2 部分-员工成果。
J Nurs Manag. 2014 Jan;22(1):16-28. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12059. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
3
The effects of perceived organisational support and span of control on the organisational commitment of novice leaders.
感知到的组织支持和管理跨度对新手领导者组织承诺的影响。
J Nurs Manag. 2015 Apr;23(3):307-14. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12131. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
4
Testing the effects of an empowerment-based leadership development programme: part 1 - leader outcomes.检验赋能型领导力发展项目的效果:第 1 部分——领导者结果。
J Nurs Manag. 2014 Jan;22(1):4-15. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12053. Epub 2013 May 8.
5
What can we learn from the existing evidence of the business case for investments in nursing care: importance of content, context, and policy environment.我们可以从现有的投资于护理的商业案例证据中学到什么:内容、背景和政策环境的重要性。
Med Care. 2013 Apr;51(4 Suppl 2):S47-52. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182849fb4.
6
First-line nurse leaders' health-care change management initiatives.一线护士领导者的医疗保健变革管理举措。
J Nurs Manag. 2012 Mar;20(2):249-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01338.x. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
7
Nurse turnover: a literature review - an update.护士离职:文献综述——更新版。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jul;49(7):887-905. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
8
High-performance work systems in health care, part 3: the role of the business case.医疗保健中的高绩效工作系统,第 3 部分:商业案例的作用。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2012 Apr-Jun;37(2):110-21. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31822e2a6b.
9
An empowerment framework for nursing leadership development: supporting evidence.赋能护理领导力发展的框架:支持证据。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Jan;68(1):159-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05746.x. Epub 2011 Jul 3.
10
Leadership practices and staff nurses' intent to stay: a systematic review.领导力实践与护士员工留职意愿:系统评价。
J Nurs Manag. 2011 May;19(4):461-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01209.x. Epub 2011 Mar 29.