Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Md.
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Md.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Sep-Oct;6(5):1649-1654.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.12.033. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
Patients who report a penicillin (PCN) allergy receive suboptimal antibiotic therapy compared with patients not reporting an allergy. However, a majority of patients who report PCN allergy are not truly allergic on confirmatory testing. Ruling out PCN allergy by testing may improve clinical and economic outcomes for patients with reported allergies requiring antibiotic therapy.
The objective of this study was to summarize clinical and economic outcomes associated with PCN allergy and provide recommendations for future cost-effectiveness analyses for PCN allergy testing.
A literature search was conducted using SCOPUS, EMBASE, and PubMed, including all articles published any date through April 25, 2017 (PROSPERO Registration number 42017064112). A total of 1518 abstracts were found during the initial search with 96 duplicates, for a total of 1422 articles for screening. Thirty articles were included for qualitative synthesis and full data extraction.
The majority of the studies included had an observational design focusing on inpatient admissions. The most frequently measured outcome in the context of PCN allergy was optimizing antibiotic therapy. Patients with PCN allergy were found to have direct drug costs during inpatient admission ranging from no difference to an additional $609/patient compared with patients without PCN allergy. Outpatient prescription costs were estimated from $14 to $193/patient higher for PCN allergic patients. Total inpatient costs were less for patients without PCN allergy with average savings from $1145 to $4254/patient.
Evaluations of clinical and economic outcomes of PCN allergy are primarily observational and focus on inpatient populations. Long-term relationships between PCN allergy and clinical and economic outcomes are unknown.
与未报告过敏的患者相比,报告有青霉素(PCN)过敏的患者接受的抗生素治疗效果较差。然而,大多数报告有 PCN 过敏的患者在确证性检测中并未真正过敏。通过检测排除 PCN 过敏可能会改善需要抗生素治疗的有过敏史的患者的临床和经济结局。
本研究旨在总结与 PCN 过敏相关的临床和经济结局,并为未来 PCN 过敏检测的成本效益分析提供建议。
使用 SCOPUS、EMBASE 和 PubMed 进行文献检索,检索所有截至 2017 年 4 月 25 日(PROSPERO 注册号 42017064112)发布的文章。初步搜索共发现 1518 篇摘要,其中有 96 篇重复,共筛选出 1422 篇文章。30 篇文章被纳入定性综合和全面数据提取。
大多数纳入的研究均为观察性设计,侧重于住院患者。在 PCN 过敏的背景下,最常测量的结果是优化抗生素治疗。与无 PCN 过敏的患者相比,PCN 过敏患者的住院期间直接药物费用从无差异到每位患者额外 609 美元不等。PCN 过敏患者的门诊处方费用估计每位患者高出 14 至 193 美元。无 PCN 过敏患者的总住院费用较低,每位患者节省 1145 至 4254 美元。
PCN 过敏的临床和经济结局评估主要为观察性研究,且侧重于住院患者人群。PCN 过敏与临床和经济结局之间的长期关系尚不清楚。