Chen Justin R, Tarver Scott A, Alvarez Kristin S, Tran Trang, Khan David A
Division of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.
Department of Pharmacy Services, Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Tex.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 May-Jun;5(3):686-693. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.09.045. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
Penicillin allergy testing is underutilized in inpatients despite its potential to immediately impact antibiotic treatment. Although most tested patients are able to tolerate penicillin, limited availability and awareness of this tool leads to the use of costly and harmful substitutes.
We established an inpatient service at a large academic hospital to identify and test patients with a history of penicillin allergy with the goals of removing inaccurate diagnoses, reducing the use of beta-lactam alternatives, and educating patients and clinicians about the procedure.
Eligible inpatients were flagged daily through the electronic medical record and prioritized via a specialized algorithm. A trained clinical pharmacist performed penicillin skin tests and challenges preemptively or by provider request. Clinical characteristics and antibiotic use were analyzed in tested patients.
A total of 1203 applicable charts were detected by our system leading to 252 direct evaluations over 18 months. Overall, 228 subjects (90.5%) had their penicillin allergy removed. Of these, 223 were cleared via testing and 5 by discovery of prior penicillin tolerance. Among patients testing negative, 85 (38%) subsequently received beta-lactams, preventing 504 inpatient days and 648 outpatient days on alternative agents.
Penicillin allergy testing using a physician-pharmacist team model effectively removes reported allergies in hospitalized patients. The electronic medical record is a valuable asset for locating and stratifying individuals who benefit most from intervention. Proactive testing substantially reduces unnecessary inpatient and outpatient use of beta-lactam alternatives that may otherwise go unaddressed.
尽管青霉素过敏试验有可能立即影响抗生素治疗,但住院患者中该试验的应用未得到充分利用。虽然大多数接受检测的患者能够耐受青霉素,但该工具的可用性有限且认知不足,导致使用成本高昂且有害的替代药物。
我们在一家大型学术医院设立了一项住院服务,以识别和检测有青霉素过敏史的患者,目标是消除不准确的诊断,减少β-内酰胺类替代药物的使用,并就该程序对患者和临床医生进行教育。
通过电子病历每天标记符合条件的住院患者,并通过专门算法确定优先级。一名经过培训的临床药剂师会主动或根据医生要求进行青霉素皮肤试验和激发试验。对接受检测的患者的临床特征和抗生素使用情况进行了分析。
我们的系统共检测到1203份适用病历,在18个月内进行了252次直接评估。总体而言,228名受试者(90.5%)的青霉素过敏被消除。其中,223人通过检测得以清除,5人通过发现先前的青霉素耐受性得以清除。在检测结果为阴性的患者中,85人(38%)随后接受了β-内酰胺类药物治疗,避免了使用替代药物的504个住院日和648个门诊日。
采用医生-药剂师团队模式进行青霉素过敏试验可有效消除住院患者报告的过敏情况。电子病历是定位和分层那些最能从干预中受益的个体的宝贵资产。主动检测可大幅减少β-内酰胺类替代药物在住院和门诊中的不必要使用,否则这些问题可能得不到解决。