Hooker Gillian W, Babu D, Myers M F, Zierhut H, McAllister M
NextGxDx, 810 Crescent Centre Dr, Suite 280, Franklin, TN, 37067, USA.
Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.
J Genet Couns. 2017 Jun;26(3):355-360. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0076-9. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
As the demand for evidence to support the value of genetic counseling increases, it is critical that reporting of genetic counseling interventions in research and other types of studies (e.g. process improvement or service evaluation studies) adopt greater rigor. As in other areas of healthcare, the appraisal, synthesis, and translation of research findings into genetic counseling practice are likely to be improved if clear specifications of genetic counseling interventions are reported when studies involving genetic counseling are published. To help improve reporting practices, the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) convened a task force in 2015 to develop consensus standards for the reporting of genetic counseling interventions. Following review by the NSGC Board of Directors, the NSGC Practice Guidelines Committee and the editorial board of the Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23 items across 8 domains were proposed as standards for the reporting of genetic counseling interventions in the published literature (GCIRS: Genetic Counseling Intervention Reporting Standards). The authors recommend adoption of these standards by authors and journals when reporting studies involving genetic counseling interventions.
随着支持遗传咨询价值的证据需求不断增加,在研究及其他类型的研究(如过程改进或服务评估研究)中对遗传咨询干预措施进行报告时采用更高的严谨性至关重要。与医疗保健的其他领域一样,如果在发表涉及遗传咨询的研究时能清晰说明遗传咨询干预措施,那么将研究结果评估、综合并转化为遗传咨询实践的情况可能会得到改善。为了帮助改进报告做法,美国国家遗传咨询师协会(NSGC)于2015年召集了一个特别工作组,以制定遗传咨询干预措施报告的共识标准。经NSGC董事会、NSGC实践指南委员会以及《遗传咨询杂志》编辑委员会审查后,提出了8个领域的23项内容作为已发表文献中遗传咨询干预措施报告的标准(GCIRS:遗传咨询干预报告标准)。作者建议作者和期刊在报告涉及遗传咨询干预措施的研究时采用这些标准。