• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜取石术在慢性抗凝或抗血小板治疗患者中的安全性。

Safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients on chronic anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2018 Nov;46(6):581-585. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1034-1. Epub 2018 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-018-1034-1
PMID:29356876
Abstract

In developed countries, the incidence of cardiovascular disease is increasing, therefore, anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs are a widespread treatment nowadays. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is the first-line treatment for large or complex stones (> 2 cm) and remains an alternative for the smaller ones. The objective of this study is to analyze whether PNL surgery is a safe procedure in patients under a treatment discontinuation protocol for anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies. We retrospectively studied 301 patients who underwent PNL in our hospital between 2008 and 2016 and identified 46 patients on chronic antiplatelet or anticoagulation treatment. With respect to PNL outcomes, the stone-free rate was similar (78 vs 74%, p = 0.762) in both groups, without any significant differences in the overall postoperative complications (17 vs 26%, p = 0.203). The incidence of hemorrhagic complications was similar between groups (12 vs 9%, p = 0.492), as demonstrated by the mean drop in hemoglobin (Hb), which was comparable in both cohorts (2.2 ± 1.3 vs 2.0 ± 1.4 p = 0.270) and the blood transfusion rate (14% in group A and 8% in group B, p = 0.205). No thromboembolic events were found within the year after the PNL procedure. PNL is a safe and effective intervention in patients under a treatment discontinuation protocol for anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies. Although our study demonstrates the feasibility of this protocol, new scientific evidence aims to stratify the thromboembolic and bleeding risk of each patient to individualize the perioperative management thereafter.

摘要

在发达国家,心血管疾病的发病率正在上升,因此,抗凝和抗血小板药物是目前广泛使用的治疗方法。经皮肾镜碎石术(PNL)是治疗大或复杂结石(>2cm)的首选方法,也是治疗较小结石的替代方法。本研究旨在分析在抗凝或抗血小板治疗停药方案下的患者中,PNL 手术是否安全。我们回顾性研究了 2008 年至 2016 年间在我院接受 PNL 的 301 例患者,确定了 46 例接受慢性抗血小板或抗凝治疗的患者。就 PNL 结果而言,两组的结石清除率相似(78%比 74%,p=0.762),总体术后并发症无显著差异(17%比 26%,p=0.203)。两组出血性并发症的发生率相似(12%比 9%,p=0.492),两组血红蛋白(Hb)平均下降量相似(2.2±1.3 比 2.0±1.4,p=0.270),输血率相似(A 组 14%,B 组 8%,p=0.205)。在 PNL 术后 1 年内未发现血栓栓塞事件。在抗凝或抗血小板治疗停药方案下的患者中,PNL 是一种安全有效的干预措施。尽管我们的研究证明了该方案的可行性,但新的科学证据旨在对每个患者的血栓栓塞和出血风险进行分层,以便此后对围手术期管理进行个体化。

相似文献

1
Safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients on chronic anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.经皮肾镜取石术在慢性抗凝或抗血小板治疗患者中的安全性。
Urolithiasis. 2018 Nov;46(6):581-585. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1034-1. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
2
Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large kidney stones: a randomized prospective study.经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗大肾结石的比较:一项随机前瞻性研究。
Urolithiasis. 2019 Jun;47(3):289-295. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1061-y. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
3
Mini vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a comparative study.微通道与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石:一项对照研究。
Urolithiasis. 2019 Apr;47(2):207-214. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1055-9. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
4
Safety and efficacy of PNL vs RIRS in the management of stones located in horseshoe kidneys: A critical comparative evaluation.经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)与逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗马蹄肾结石的安全性和有效性:一项关键的对比评估
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2018 Sep 30;90(3):149-154. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2018.3.149.
5
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stones in anomalous-kidneys: a prospective study.经皮肾镜碎石术治疗异常肾肾结石: 一项前瞻性研究。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Aug;45(4):407-414. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0926-1. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
6
Bilateral Single-session vs Staged Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones: A Comparative Study.双侧单次手术与分期微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的比较研究
Urology. 2018 Oct;120:62-67. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
7
Transient cessation of antiplatelet medication before percutaneous stone surgery: does it have any safety concern on bleeding related problems?经皮结石手术后短暂停用抗血小板药物:其对出血相关问题是否存在安全隐患?
Urolithiasis. 2017 Aug;45(4):371-378. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0921-6. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
8
Tract Sizes in Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review from the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel.微创经皮肾取石术中的通道大小:欧洲泌尿外科学会结石指南专家组的系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):220-235. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.046. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
9
Do the urolithiasis scoring systems predict the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in cases with anatomical abnormalities?尿路结石评分系统能否预测解剖结构异常患者经皮肾镜取石术的成功率?
Urolithiasis. 2017 Jun;45(3):305-310. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0903-8. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
10
The optical puncture combined standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus the conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones without hydronephrosis: a comparative study.光学穿刺联合标准经皮肾镜取石术与传统经皮肾镜取石术治疗无肾积水肾结石的对比研究
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Apr;55(4):993-1000. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03386-z. Epub 2022 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective cohort study.经皮肾镜取石术后药物性血栓预防的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Urol. 2025 Sep 2;43(1):525. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05905-w.
2
Evaluating postoperative complications in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones larger than 2 cm: a retrospective study utilizing the E-PASS scoring system.评估标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径大于2厘米肾结石的术后并发症:一项采用E-PASS评分系统的回顾性研究
Urolithiasis. 2025 Jan 7;53(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01689-7.
3
The effects of continuing aspirin on blood loss and postoperative outcomes in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of Patients on Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in the Acute Care and Periprocedural Setting: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.急性护理和围手术期非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂治疗患者的管理:美国心脏协会科学声明
Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e604-e633. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000477. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
2
EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.EAU 指南:尿石症的介入治疗
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
3
Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
持续服用阿司匹林对经皮肾镜取石术患者失血及术后结局的影响
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2023 Feb 25;11(1):50-58. eCollection 2023.
心房颤动患者围手术期的桥接抗凝治疗
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 27;373(9):823-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501035. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
4
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients on chronic anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy.接受慢性抗凝/抗血小板治疗患者的经皮肾镜取石术
Chonnam Med J. 2012 Aug;48(2):103-7. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2012.48.2.103. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
5
Two contemporary series of percutaneous tract dilation for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术的两个当代经皮通道扩张系列研究。
J Endourol. 2009 Oct;23(10):1655-61. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0213.
6
[Venous thromboembolism risk and antithrombotic prophylaxis among patients admitted to Spanish hospitals (ENDORSE study)].西班牙医院收治患者的静脉血栓栓塞风险及抗栓预防(ENDORSE研究)
Med Clin (Barc). 2009 Jun 6;133(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2009.01.040. Epub 2009 May 15.
7
Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy in patients on anticoagulant therapy.抗凝治疗患者经皮肾镜取石术的安全性和有效性。
J Urol. 2009 Jan;181(1):144-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
8
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it really less morbid?无管经皮肾镜取石术:其并发症真的更少吗?
J Endourol. 2008 Mar;22(3):427-34. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0269.
9
Safety and efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium:YAG lithotripsy for intrarenal stones in anticoagulated cases.柔性输尿管肾镜及钬激光碎石术治疗抗凝患者肾内结石的安全性和有效性
J Urol. 2008 Apr;179(4):1415-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.076. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
10
[Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the Spanish population aged 60 years or more. The PREV-ICTUS study].[西班牙60岁及以上人群中心房颤动的患病率。PREV-ICTUS研究]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2007 Jun;60(6):616-24. doi: 10.1157/13107118.