• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Early Psychosis Screener (EPS): Quantitative validation against the SIPS using machine learning.早期精神病筛选器 (EPS):使用机器学习对 SIPS 的定量验证。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Jul;197:516-521. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.11.030. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
2
The Early Psychosis Screener (EPS): Item development and qualitative validation.早期精神病筛查器 (EPS):项目开发和定性验证。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Jul;197:504-508. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.11.027. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
3
The Early Psychosis Screener for Internet (EPSI)-SR: Predicting 12 month psychotic conversion using machine learning.互联网早期精神病筛选器(EPSI-SR):使用机器学习预测 12 个月精神病转化。
Schizophr Res. 2019 Jun;208:390-396. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
4
Identification and prediction of clinical high risk of psychosis in Chinese outpatients using two-stage screening.使用两阶段筛查识别和预测中国门诊患者的精神病临床高危状态。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Dec;202:284-290. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.026. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
5
Psychometric Properties of Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Version among Chinese Help-Seeking Individuals.中国求助者中前驱症状问卷简版的心理测量学特性
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e0148935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148935. eCollection 2016.
6
The Italian version of the 92-item Prodromal Questionnaire: Concurrent validity with the SIPS and factor analysis in a sample of 258 outpatients aged 11-36years.意大利版 92 项前驱期问卷:在一个年龄为 11-36 岁的 258 名门诊患者样本中与 SIPS 的并行效度和因子分析。
Schizophr Res. 2017 Nov;189:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
7
Prediction of psychosis in prodrome: development and validation of a simple, personalized risk calculator.前驱期精神病预测:简单个性化风险计算器的开发与验证。
Psychol Med. 2019 Sep;49(12):1990-1998. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002738. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
8
Psychosis-like experiences and distress among adolescents using mental health services.青少年在使用心理健康服务时出现的类精神病体验和困扰。
Schizophr Res. 2014 Feb;152(2-3):498-502. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.12.012. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
9
Predicting psychosis in a general adolescent psychiatric sample.在一般青少年精神科样本中预测精神病。
Schizophr Res. 2014 Sep;158(1-3):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.06.028. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
10
Translation and validation study of the prodromal questionnaire brief version into Indonesian language.前驱期问卷简短版的印度尼西亚语翻译和验证研究。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2018 Oct;37:96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening for Early Emerging Mental Experiences: Feasibility of Psychosis Screening in Integrated Care Settings.早期出现的心理体验筛查:综合医疗环境中精神病筛查的可行性。
Psychiatr Serv. 2025 Jun 1;76(6):540-546. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20240244. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
2
Machine minds: Artificial intelligence in psychiatry.机器思维:精神病学中的人工智能
Ind Psychiatry J. 2024 Aug;33(Suppl 1):S265-S267. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_157_23. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
3
Identification of Psychosis Risk and Diagnosis of First-Episode Psychosis: Advice for Clinicians.精神病风险识别与首发精神病诊断:给临床医生的建议
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Mar 21;17:1365-1383. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S423865. eCollection 2024.
4
Cross-Sectional Descriptive Pilot Study on the Risk of Psychotic Disorders among Adolescents.青少年精神病性障碍风险的横断面描述性试点研究
Children (Basel). 2021 Oct 14;8(10):916. doi: 10.3390/children8100916.
5
AI in patient flow: applications of artificial intelligence to improve patient flow in NHS acute mental health inpatient units.患者流动中的人工智能:人工智能在改善英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)急性心理健康住院单元患者流动方面的应用。
Heliyon. 2021 May 12;7(5):e06993. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06993. eCollection 2021 May.
6
Screening of the college students at clinical high risk for psychosis in China: a multicenter epidemiological study.中国大学生精神病临床高危人群的筛查:一项多中心的流行病学研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 May 17;21(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03229-8.
7
Applications of artificial intelligence to improve patient flow on mental health inpatient units - Narrative literature review.应用人工智能改善精神科住院病房的患者流程——叙事性文献综述
Heliyon. 2021 Apr 15;7(4):e06626. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06626. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
The Critical Need for Help-Seeking Controls in Clinical High-Risk Research.临床高风险研究中对寻求帮助控制措施的迫切需求。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2019 Nov;7(6):1171-1189. doi: 10.1177/2167702619855660. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
9
Validation of the Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief in a representative sample of adolescents: Internal structure, norms, reliability, and links with psychopathology.《前驱期问卷-简表》在代表性青少年样本中的验证:内部结构、常模、信度以及与精神病理学的关联。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Dec;27(4):e1740. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1740. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
10
Considerations for the development and implementation of brief screening tools in the identification of early psychosis.在早期精神病识别中开发和实施简短筛查工具的注意事项。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Sep;199:41-43. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Baseline demographics, clinical features and predictors of conversion among 200 individuals in a longitudinal prospective psychosis-risk cohort.一项纵向前瞻性精神病风险队列中200名个体的基线人口统计学、临床特征及转化预测因素。
Psychol Med. 2017 Aug;47(11):1923-1935. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000319. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
2
Psychometric Properties of Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Version among Chinese Help-Seeking Individuals.中国求助者中前驱症状问卷简版的心理测量学特性
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e0148935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148935. eCollection 2016.
3
Specificity of Incident Diagnostic Outcomes in Patients at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.临床高风险精神病患者新发诊断结果的特异性
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Sep;41(5):1066-75. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv091.
4
Psychosis risk screening among secondary school students in Abeokuta, Nigeria: Validity of the Prodromal Questionnaire - Brief Version (PQ-B).尼日利亚阿贝奥库塔中学生的精神病风险筛查:前驱症状问卷简版(PQ-B)的效度
Schizophr Res. 2015 May;164(1-3):281-2. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
5
Psychosis risk screening: a systematic review.精神病风险筛查:一项系统综述。
Schizophr Res. 2014 Sep;158(1-3):11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.06.036. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
6
Basic symptoms and psychotic symptoms: their relationships in the at risk mental states, first episode and multi-episode schizophrenia.基本症状和精神病症状:在高危精神状态、首发和反复发作精神分裂症中的关系。
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 May;55(4):785-91. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
7
Racial and ethnic differences in the prevalence of psychotic symptoms in the general population.一般人群中精神症状的流行存在种族和民族差异。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Nov 1;64(11):1103-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200348.
8
North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS 2): overview and recruitment.北美前驱期纵向研究(NAPLS 2):概述与招募。
Schizophr Res. 2012 Dec;142(1-3):77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.09.012. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
9
Psychosis risk screening in youth: a validation study of three self-report measures of attenuated psychosis symptoms.青少年精神病风险筛查:三种自评式精神病前驱症状量表的验证研究。
Schizophr Res. 2012 Oct;141(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.07.022. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
10
Identifying men at ultra high risk of psychosis in a prison population.在监狱人群中识别有极高患精神病风险的男性。
Schizophr Res. 2012 Apr;136(1-3):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.01.025. Epub 2012 Feb 12.

早期精神病筛选器 (EPS):使用机器学习对 SIPS 的定量验证。

The Early Psychosis Screener (EPS): Quantitative validation against the SIPS using machine learning.

机构信息

TeleSage, Inc., 201 East Rosemary St., Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.

New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 31, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Schizophr Res. 2018 Jul;197:516-521. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.11.030. Epub 2018 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2017.11.030
PMID:29358019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6051928/
Abstract

Machine learning techniques were used to identify highly informative early psychosis self-report items and to validate an early psychosis screener (EPS) against the Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes (SIPS). The Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Version (PQ-B) and 148 additional items were administered to 229 individuals being screened with the SIPS at 7 North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study sites and at Columbia University. Fifty individuals were found to have SIPS scores of 0, 1, or 2, making them clinically low risk (CLR) controls; 144 were classified as clinically high risk (CHR) (SIPS 3-5) and 35 were found to have first episode psychosis (FEP) (SIPS 6). Spectral clustering analysis, performed on 124 of the items, yielded two cohesive item groups, the first mostly related to psychosis and mania, the second mostly related to depression, anxiety, and social and general work/school functioning. Items within each group were sorted according to their usefulness in distinguishing between CLR and CHR individuals using the Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance procedure. A receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) analysis indicated that maximal differentiation of CLR and CHR participants was achieved with a 26-item solution (AUC=0.899±0.001). The EPS-26 outperformed the PQ-B (AUC=0.834±0.001). For screening purposes, the self-report EPS-26 appeared to differentiate individuals who are either CLR or CHR approximately as well as the clinician-administered SIPS. The EPS-26 may prove useful as a self-report screener and may lead to a decrease in the duration of untreated psychosis. A validation of the EPS-26 against actual conversion is underway.

摘要

机器学习技术被用于识别具有高度信息量的早期精神病自我报告项目,并根据精神病风险综合征结构化访谈 (SIPS) 对早期精神病筛查器 (EPS) 进行验证。 Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Version (PQ-B) 和 148 个附加项目被施用于在 7 个北美前驱纵向研究站点和哥伦比亚大学接受 SIPS 筛查的 229 个人。发现 50 个人的 SIPS 分数为 0、1 或 2,使他们处于临床低风险 (CLR) 对照组;144 人被归类为临床高风险 (CHR) (SIPS 3-5),35 人被诊断为首发精神病 (FEP) (SIPS 6)。对 124 个项目进行的光谱聚类分析产生了两个凝聚的项目组,第一个主要与精神病和躁狂有关,第二个主要与抑郁、焦虑、社会和一般工作/学校功能有关。根据最小冗余最大相关性程序,对每个组中的项目进行排序,以区分 CLR 和 CHR 个体。接收器操作特征曲线下面积 (AUC) 分析表明,区分 CLR 和 CHR 参与者的最佳区分是使用 26 项解决方案 (AUC=0.899±0.001)。EPS-26 的表现优于 PQ-B (AUC=0.834±0.001)。出于筛查目的,自我报告的 EPS-26 似乎与临床医生管理的 SIPS 一样能够区分 CLR 或 CHR 个体。EPS-26 可能作为自我报告筛查器很有用,并可能导致未治疗精神病的持续时间缩短。正在对 EPS-26 进行针对实际转化的验证。