• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病理学图像库在前列腺癌分级标准化中的应用。

Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading.

机构信息

Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Histopathology. 2018 Jul;73(1):8-18. doi: 10.1111/his.13471. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

DOI:
10.1111/his.13471
PMID:29359484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7838555/
Abstract

AIMS

Despite efforts to standardise grading of prostate cancer, even among experts there is still a considerable variation in grading practices. In this study we describe the use of Pathology Imagebase, a novel reference image library, for setting an international standard in prostate cancer grading.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) recently launched a reference image database supervised by experts. A panel of 24 international experts in prostate pathology reviewed independently microphotographs of 90 cases of prostate needle biopsies with cancer. A linear weighted kappa of 0.67 (95% confidence interval = 0.62-0.72) and consensus was reached in 50 cases. The interobserver weighted kappa varied from 0.48 to 0.89. The highest level of agreement was seen for Gleason score (GS) 3 + 3 = 6 (ISUP grade 1), while higher grades and particularly GS 4 + 3 = 7 (ISUP grade 3) showed considerable disagreement. Once a two-thirds majority was reached, images were moved automatically into a public database available for all ISUP members at www.isupweb.org. Non-members are able to access a limited number of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

It is anticipated that the database will assist pathologists to calibrate their grading and, hence, decrease interobserver variability. It will also help to identify instances where definitions of grades need to be clarified.

摘要

目的

尽管人们努力使前列腺癌分级标准化,但即使在专家之间,分级实践仍存在相当大的差异。在这项研究中,我们描述了使用 Pathology Imagebase,一种新的参考图像库,为前列腺癌分级制定国际标准。

方法和结果

国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)最近推出了一个由专家监督的参考图像数据库。一个由 24 名国际前列腺病理专家组成的小组独立地对 90 例前列腺针吸活检癌症的显微照片进行了审查。50 例达成了线性加权κ值为 0.67(95%置信区间= 0.62-0.72)和共识。观察者间加权κ值从 0.48 到 0.89 不等。在 GS 3 + 3 = 6(ISUP 分级 1)方面达成了最高水平的共识,而较高的分级,特别是 GS 4 + 3 = 7(ISUP 分级 3)则存在相当大的分歧。一旦达到三分之二的多数,图像将自动移动到公共数据库中,所有 ISUP 成员都可以在 www.isupweb.org 上访问。非成员可以访问有限数量的病例。

结论

预计该数据库将有助于病理学家校准其分级,从而减少观察者间的变异性。它还将有助于确定需要澄清等级定义的情况。

相似文献

1
Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading.病理学图像库在前列腺癌分级标准化中的应用。
Histopathology. 2018 Jul;73(1):8-18. doi: 10.1111/his.13471. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
2
Pathology Imagebase-a reference image database for standardization of pathology.病理学图像库——病理学标准化的参考图像数据库。
Histopathology. 2017 Nov;71(5):677-685. doi: 10.1111/his.13313. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
3
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer - An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading.国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌分级——当代分级的ISUP共识
APMIS. 2016 Jun;124(6):433-5. doi: 10.1111/apm.12533.
4
SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.SOCS3免疫组化表达似乎支持2005年和2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)改良的Gleason分级系统。
Prostate. 2017 May;77(6):597-603. doi: 10.1002/pros.23299. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
5
Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.337 位欧洲病理学家之间的 Gleason 分级标准化。
Histopathology. 2013 Jan;62(2):247-56. doi: 10.1111/his.12008.
6
The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌分级系统的预后意义。
Pathology. 2015 Oct;47(6):515-9. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000315.
7
Identification of areas of grading difficulties in prostate cancer and comparison with artificial intelligence assisted grading.识别前列腺癌分级困难区域,并与人工智能辅助分级进行比较。
Virchows Arch. 2020 Dec;477(6):777-786. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-02858-w. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
8
Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.在格里森(Gleason)和国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌分级中存在争议的问题:国际实施的建议。
Pathology. 2019 Aug;51(5):463-473. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
9
Evolution, controversies and the future of prostate cancer grading.前列腺癌分级的演变、争议与未来
Pathol Int. 2019 Feb;69(2):55-66. doi: 10.1111/pin.12761. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
10
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌Gleason分级共识会议:分级模式的定义及新分级系统的建议
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and retrospective validation of an artificial intelligence system for diagnostic assessment of prostate biopsies: study protocol.用于前列腺活检诊断评估的人工智能系统的开发与回顾性验证:研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 7;15(7):e097591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097591.
2
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Evaluation of Prostate Pathology.人工智能在前列腺病理学评估中的作用。
Pathol Int. 2025 May;75(5):213-220. doi: 10.1111/pin.70015. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
3
DNA ploidy and PTEN as biomarkers for predicting aggressive disease in prostate cancer patients under active surveillance.

本文引用的文献

1
Pathology Imagebase-a reference image database for standardization of pathology.病理学图像库——病理学标准化的参考图像数据库。
Histopathology. 2017 Nov;71(5):677-685. doi: 10.1111/his.13313. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
2
Outcome of Gleason 3 + 5 = 8 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed on Needle Biopsy: Prognostic Comparison with Gleason 4 + 4 = 8.前列腺癌 Gleason 3+5=8 活检诊断结果:与 Gleason 4+4=8 的预后比较
J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1076-81. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.105. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
3
Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists.
DNA 倍性和 PTEN 作为预测前列腺癌主动监测患者侵袭性疾病的生物标志物。
Br J Cancer. 2024 Sep;131(5):895-904. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02780-x. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
4
Expected impact of MRI-targeted biopsy interreader variability among uropathologists on ProScreen prostate cancer screening trial: a pre-trial validation study.尿路上皮病理学家间 MRI 靶向活检的预期影响对 ProScreen 前列腺癌筛查试验:一项试验前验证研究。
World J Urol. 2024 Apr 6;42(1):217. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04898-2.
5
Critical evaluation of artificial intelligence as a digital twin of pathologists for prostate cancer pathology.人工智能作为前列腺癌病理学数字孪生体的批判性评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 4;14(1):5284. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55228-w.
6
Low-risk prostate lesions: An evidence review to inform discussion on losing the "cancer" label.低危前列腺病变:一项旨在为“去癌症化”讨论提供证据的综述。
Prostate. 2023 May;83(6):498-515. doi: 10.1002/pros.24493. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
7
A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging.关于人工智能在前列腺癌影像检测中的综述。
Ther Adv Urol. 2022 Oct 10;14:17562872221128791. doi: 10.1177/17562872221128791. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
8
Detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques.利用深度学习技术检测和分级前列腺癌根治术标本。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021 Oct 29;76:e3198. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e3198. eCollection 2021.
9
Interobserver reproducibility of perineural invasion of prostatic adenocarcinoma in needle biopsies.前列腺腺癌针吸活检中神经周围侵犯的观察者间可重复性。
Virchows Arch. 2021 Jun;478(6):1109-1116. doi: 10.1007/s00428-021-03039-z. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
10
Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists.人工智能辅助显著提高了病理学家对前列腺活检的 Gleason 分级。
Mod Pathol. 2021 Mar;34(3):660-671. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-0640-y. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
Gleason 4级前列腺腺癌模式:泌尿生殖病理学家之间的观察者间一致性研究
Histopathology. 2016 Sep;69(3):441-9. doi: 10.1111/his.12976. Epub 2016 May 24.
4
Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50-69 years (STHLM3): a prospective population-based diagnostic study.50-69 岁男性前列腺癌筛查(STHLM3):一项前瞻性基于人群的诊断研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1667-76. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00361-7. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
5
Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens.前列腺活检和前列腺切除标本中 Gleason 分级定量的临床应用
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):592-598. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.029. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
6
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌Gleason分级共识会议:分级模式的定义及新分级系统的建议
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.
7
Diagnosis of "Poorly Formed Glands" Gleason Pattern 4 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: An Interobserver Reproducibility Study Among Urologic Pathologists With Recommendations.针吸活检中“腺体形态不佳”的Gleason 4级前列腺腺癌的诊断:泌尿外科病理学家间的观察者间再现性研究及建议
Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Oct;39(10):1331-9. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000457.
8
Diagnosis of Gleason pattern 5 prostate adenocarcinoma on core needle biopsy: an interobserver reproducibility study among urologic pathologists.在核心针活检中诊断 Gleason 模式 5 前列腺腺癌:泌尿科病理学家之间的观察者间可重复性研究。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Sep;39(9):1242-9. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000442.
9
Gleason inflation 1998-2011: a registry study of 97,168 men.格里森评分膨胀 1998-2011:97168 名男性的注册研究。
BJU Int. 2015 Feb;115(2):248-55. doi: 10.1111/bju.12671.
10
Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.337 位欧洲病理学家之间的 Gleason 分级标准化。
Histopathology. 2013 Jan;62(2):247-56. doi: 10.1111/his.12008.