• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌分级系统的预后意义。

The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.

作者信息

Samaratunga Hemamali, Delahunt Brett, Gianduzzo Troy, Coughlin Geoff, Duffy David, LeFevre Ian, Johannsen Shulammite, Egevad Lars, Yaxley John

机构信息

1Aquesta Pathology 2University of Queensland 3Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia 4Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Wellington, Otago, New Zealand 5Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Pathology. 2015 Oct;47(6):515-9. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000315.

DOI:10.1097/PAT.0000000000000315
PMID:26325670
Abstract

The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) modified Gleason grading system was further amended in 2014 with the establishment of grade groupings (ISUP grading). This study examined the predictive value of ISUP grading, comparing results with recognised prognostic parameters.Of 3700 men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) reported at Aquesta Pathology between 2008 and 2013, 2079 also had a positive needle biopsy available for review. We examined the association between needle biopsy 2014 ISUP grade and 2005 modified Gleason score, tumour volume, pathological stage of the subsequent RP tumour, as well as biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS). The median age was 62 (range 32-79 years). Median serum prostate specific antigen was 5.9 (range 0.4-69 ng/mL). For needle biopsies, 280 (13.5%), 1031 (49.6%), 366 (17.6%), 77 (3.7%) and 325 (15.6%) were 2014 ISUP grades 1-5, respectively. Needle biopsy 2014 ISUP grade showed a significant association with RP tumour volume (p < 0.001), TNM pT and N stage (p < 0.001) and BRFS (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression model showed serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) at the time of diagnosis and ISUP grade >2 to be significantly associated with BRFS.This study provides evidence of the prognostic significance of ISUP grading for thin core needle biopsy of prostate.

摘要

2005年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)修订的Gleason分级系统于2014年随着分级分组(ISUP分级)的建立而进一步修订。本研究检验了ISUP分级的预测价值,并将结果与公认的预后参数进行比较。在阿夸斯塔病理学报告的2008年至2013年间接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的3700名男性中,2079名患者也有阳性穿刺活检结果可供复查。我们研究了穿刺活检2014年ISUP分级与2005年修订的Gleason评分、肿瘤体积、后续RP肿瘤的病理分期以及无生化复发生存期(BRFS)之间的关联。中位年龄为62岁(范围32 - 79岁)。中位血清前列腺特异性抗原为5.9(范围0.4 - 69 ng/mL)。对于穿刺活检,2014年ISUP 1 - 5级分别为280例(13.5%)、1031例(49.6%)、366例(17.6%)、77例(3.7%)和325例(15.6%)。穿刺活检2014年ISUP分级与RP肿瘤体积(p < 0.001)、TNM pT和N分期(p < 0.001)以及BRFS(p < 0.001)显著相关。使用Cox比例风险回归模型进行的多因素分析显示,诊断时的血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和ISUP分级>2与BRFS显著相关。本研究提供了证据,证明ISUP分级对前列腺细针穿刺活检具有预后意义。

相似文献

1
The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌分级系统的预后意义。
Pathology. 2015 Oct;47(6):515-9. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000315.
2
Validation of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading for prostatic adenocarcinoma in thin core biopsies using TROG 03.04 'RADAR' trial clinical data.利用TROG 03.04“雷达”试验临床数据对细针穿刺活检中前列腺腺癌的国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)分级进行验证。
Pathology. 2015 Oct;47(6):520-5. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000318.
3
The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.2005年国际泌尿病理学会 Gleason 分级共识指南的影响——配对分析
BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6):883-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13439. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
4
Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.2014年国际泌尿病理学会前列腺癌分级系统对接受根治性前列腺切除术患者的预测价值及长期随访
BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):651-658. doi: 10.1111/bju.13857. Epub 2017 Apr 30.
5
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer - An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading.国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌分级——当代分级的ISUP共识
APMIS. 2016 Jun;124(6):433-5. doi: 10.1111/apm.12533.
6
Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.前列腺活检对预测根治性前列腺切除术标本中 Gleason 评分的准确性:2000 - 2012 年全国趋势
BJU Int. 2017 Jan;119(1):50-56. doi: 10.1111/bju.13458. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
7
SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.SOCS3免疫组化表达似乎支持2005年和2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)改良的Gleason分级系统。
Prostate. 2017 May;77(6):597-603. doi: 10.1002/pros.23299. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
8
Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.2005年国际泌尿病理学会Gleason分级系统在前列腺穿刺活检及前列腺根治性切除标本中的应用价值。
BJU Int. 2009 May;103(9):1190-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08197.x. Epub 2008 Dec 8.
9
Implications of the International Society of Urological Pathology modified Gleason grading system.国际泌尿病理学会改良 Gleason 分级系统的意义。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012 Apr;136(4):426-34. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0495-RA.
10
Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.前列腺穿刺活检中格里森评分 3+4=7(最低格里森评分 4 成分极少)的前列腺癌与根治性前列腺切除术后标本中低危肿瘤相关。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2014 Aug;38(8):1096-101. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000235.

引用本文的文献

1
Reinterpretation of prostate cancer pathology by Appl1, Sortilin and Syndecan-1 biomarkers.通过Appl1、Sortilin和Syndecan-1生物标志物对前列腺癌病理学进行重新诠释。
Sci Data. 2024 Aug 8;11(1):852. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03696-0.
2
Long-term outcomes of the first prospective study of active surveillance for prostate cancer in Japan.日本首例前列腺癌主动监测前瞻性研究的长期结果。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2024 Oct;29(10):1557-1563. doi: 10.1007/s10147-024-02590-4. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
3
Prediction of Prostate Cancer Biochemical and Clinical Recurrence Is Improved by IHC-Assisted Grading Using Appl1, Sortilin and Syndecan-1.
使用Appl1、Sortilin和Syndecan-1的免疫组化辅助分级可改善前列腺癌生化和临床复发的预测。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 16;15(12):3215. doi: 10.3390/cancers15123215.
4
Histopathological Study of the Prostate Cancer Growth Patterns in Relation with the Grading Systems.前列腺癌生长模式与分级系统关系的组织病理学研究
Curr Health Sci J. 2022 Jan-Mar;48(1):95-101. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.48.01.14. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
5
Impact of artificial intelligence on pathologists' decisions: an experiment.人工智能对病理学家决策的影响:一项实验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Sep 12;29(10):1688-1695. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac103.
6
Narrative review of prostate cancer grading systems: will the Gleason scores be replaced by the Grade Groups?前列腺癌分级系统的叙述性综述:Gleason评分会被分级组取代吗?
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Mar;10(3):1530-1540. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-853.
7
The validation of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for patients with high-risk prostate cancer: a single-center retrospective study.2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)高危前列腺癌患者分级系统的验证:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jul 12;11:6521-6529. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S196286. eCollection 2019.
8
Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies.深度学习在前列腺活检分级组确定中的自动 Gleason 模式分类中的应用。
Virchows Arch. 2019 Jul;475(1):77-83. doi: 10.1007/s00428-019-02577-x. Epub 2019 May 16.
9
The current status of renal cell carcinoma and prostate carcinoma grading.肾细胞癌和前列腺癌分级的现状。
Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Nov-Dec;44(6):1057-1062. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.06.01.
10
Oncological outcomes in an Australian cohort according to the new prostate cancer grading groupings.根据新的前列腺癌分级分组,澳大利亚队列的肿瘤学结果。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 10;17(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3533-9.