• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用口服 P2Y12 抑制剂是否存在与性别相关的结局差异?一项纳入 107126 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Is there Sex-related Outcome Difference According to oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 107,126 Patients.

机构信息

Department of Academic Cardiology, Daisy Building, Castle Hill Hospital, Kingston upon Hull, United Kingdom.

Department of Cardiology, Cumberland Infirmary, North Cumbria University Hospitals, Carlisle, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2019;17(2):191-203. doi: 10.2174/1570161116666180123092054.

DOI:10.2174/1570161116666180123092054
PMID:29359672
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The majority of patients included in trials of anti-platelet therapy are male. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether, in addition to aspirin, P2Y12 blockade is beneficial in both women and men with acute coronary syndromes.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched and nine eligible randomised controlled studies were identified that had sex-specific clinical outcomes (n=107,126 patients). Risk Ratios (RR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated for a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke (MACE), and a safety endpoint of major bleeding for each sex. Indirect comparison analysis was performed to statistically compare ticagrelor against prasugrel.

RESULTS

Compared to aspirin alone, clopidogrel reduced MACE in men (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.92; p=0.003), but was not statistically significant in women (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.02, p=0.08). Clopidogrel therapy significantly increased bleeding in women but not men. Compared to clopidogrel, prasugrel was beneficial in men (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.97; p=0.02) but not statistically significant in women (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.06; p=0.30); ticagrelor reduced MACE in both men (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.94; p=0.001) and women (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.97; p=0.02). Indirect comparison demonstrated no significant difference between ticagrelor and prasugrel in either sex. Compared to clopidogrel, ticagrelor and prasugrel increased bleeding risk in both women and men.

CONCLUSION

In summary, in comparison to monotherapy with aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors reduce MACE in women and men. Ticagrelor was shown to be superior to clopidogrel in both sexes. Prasugrel showed a statistically significant benefit only in men; however indirect comparison did not demonstrate superiority of ticagrelor over prasugrel in women.

摘要

背景与目的

大多数抗血小板治疗试验纳入的患者为男性。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在确定,除阿司匹林外,P2Y12 抑制剂在急性冠脉综合征的女性和男性患者中是否同样有益。

方法

检索电子数据库,确定了 9 项具有性别特异性临床结局的合格随机对照研究(n=107126 例患者)。计算心血管死亡、心肌梗死或卒中(MACE)复合终点以及大出血安全性终点的风险比(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。对替格瑞洛与普拉格雷进行间接比较分析,以进行统计学比较。

结果

与单用阿司匹林相比,氯吡格雷降低了男性患者的 MACE(RR,0.79;95%CI,0.68 至 0.92;p=0.003),但在女性患者中无统计学意义(RR,0.88;95%CI,0.75 至 1.02,p=0.08)。氯吡格雷治疗显著增加了女性患者的出血风险,但未增加男性患者的出血风险。与氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷在男性患者中有益(RR,0.84;95%CI,0.73 至 0.97;p=0.02),但在女性患者中无统计学意义(RR,0.94;95%CI,0.83 至 1.06;p=0.30);替格瑞洛降低了男性(RR,0.85;95%CI,0.77 至 0.94;p=0.001)和女性(RR,0.84;95%CI,0.73 至 0.97;p=0.02)患者的 MACE。间接比较表明,在任何性别中,替格瑞洛与普拉格雷之间均无显著差异。与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛和普拉格雷增加了女性和男性患者的出血风险。

结论

总而言之,与阿司匹林单药治疗相比,P2Y12 抑制剂可降低女性和男性患者的 MACE。替格瑞洛在两性中均优于氯吡格雷。普拉格雷仅在男性中具有统计学意义的获益;然而,间接比较并未显示替格瑞洛在女性中优于普拉格雷。

相似文献

1
Is there Sex-related Outcome Difference According to oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 107,126 Patients.急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用口服 P2Y12 抑制剂是否存在与性别相关的结局差异?一项纳入 107126 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2019;17(2):191-203. doi: 10.2174/1570161116666180123092054.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Potent Oral P2Y Inhibitors in Medically Managed ACS Patients: a Meta-analysis.强效口服 P2Y 抑制剂在药物管理的 ACS 患者中的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2020 Apr;34(2):199-208. doi: 10.1007/s10557-020-06940-y.
3
Comparison of the effects of P2Y12 receptor antagonists on platelet function and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing Primary PCI: A substudy of the HEAT-PPCI trial.替格瑞洛与普拉格雷对行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者血小板功能及临床预后的影响:HEAT-PPCI 试验的亚组研究。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Mar 20;13(16):1931-1938. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00408.
4
Comparative effects of guided vs. potent P2Y12 inhibitor therapy in acute coronary syndrome: a network meta-analysis of 61 898 patients from 15 randomized trials.比较指导下与强效 P2Y12 抑制剂治疗急性冠脉综合征的效果:来自 15 项随机试验的 61898 例患者的网络荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Mar 7;43(10):959-967. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab836.
5
Meta-Analysis of Comparison of the Newer Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors (Prasugrel or Ticagrelor) to Clopidogrel in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者中新型口服P2Y12抑制剂(普拉格雷或替格瑞洛)与氯吡格雷比较的荟萃分析
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Sep 1;116(5):809-17. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.05.058. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
6
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Oral P2Y Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Network Meta-Analysis of 52 816 Patients From 12 Randomized Trials.比较口服 P2Y 抑制剂在急性冠状动脉综合征中的疗效和安全性:来自 12 项随机试验的 52816 例患者的网络荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Jul 14;142(2):150-160. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046786. Epub 2020 May 29.
7
Comparative efficacy and safety of oral P2Y inhibitors after non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a network meta-analysis.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征后口服P2Y抑制剂的疗效和安全性比较:一项网状Meta分析
Open Heart. 2022 Apr;9(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001937.
8
Impact of clopidogrel and potent P2Y 12 -inhibitors on mortality and stroke in patients with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.氯吡格雷和强效 P2Y12 抑制剂对急性冠脉综合征或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的死亡率和卒中的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jan;109(1):93-101. doi: 10.1160/TH12-06-0377. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
9
Meta-Analysis of the Relative Efficacy and Safety of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者口服P2Y12抑制剂相对疗效与安全性的Meta分析
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 1;119(11):1723-1728. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
10
Meta-Analysis Comparing P2Y Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome.比较急性冠状动脉综合征中 P2Y 抑制剂的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Jun 15;125(12):1815-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-Related Bleeding Risk in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Aspirin and a P2Y12 Inhibitor.急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受阿司匹林和 P2Y12 抑制剂双联抗血小板治疗的出血风险与性别相关。
Med Princ Pract. 2023;32(3):200-208. doi: 10.1159/000529863. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Women and Men with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pre-specified, Sex-Specific Analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 Trial.替格瑞洛与普拉格雷在急性冠状动脉综合征女性和男性患者中的疗效和安全性:ISAR-REACT 5 试验的预先设定的、基于性别的分析。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022 May 1;29(5):747-761. doi: 10.5551/jat.62776. Epub 2021 Apr 16.