• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受阿司匹林和 P2Y12 抑制剂双联抗血小板治疗的出血风险与性别相关。

Sex-Related Bleeding Risk in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Aspirin and a P2Y12 Inhibitor.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

The Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Princ Pract. 2023;32(3):200-208. doi: 10.1159/000529863. Epub 2023 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1159/000529863
PMID:36948164
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10601701/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to study sex differences in major bleeding risk in relation to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Rijnmond Collective Cardiology Research registry was designed to evaluate the application and outcomes of DAPT after ACS/PCI in the Rijnmond region in the Netherlands. Overall, 1,172 women (median age 67.5 years) and 3,087 men (median age 62.2 years) with ACS/PCI were enrolled between August 2011 and June 2013. Based on a tailored regional DAPT guideline aiming at bleeding risk minimization, 52.6% women and 66.9% men received prasugrel as first-choice P2Y12 inhibitor, in addition to aspirin. Women more frequently had contraindications for the use of prasugrel (and therefore received clopidogrel) than men (47.9 vs. 26.9%, p < 0.001). Femoral access was more common in women than in men (47.6 vs. 38.1%, p < 0.001). Women had higher incidence of major bleeding at 1 year than men (2.6 vs. 1.6%, p = 0.018). After adjustment for established bleeding risk factors, female sex was associated with over two-fold higher risk of major bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio 2.33; 95% confidence interval 1.26-4.32). This difference was apparent at discharge and appeared to be caused by access site bleedings (0.9 vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001). No sex differences were found in non-access site-related major bleeding up to 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Women with ACS/PCI receiving DAPT had higher major bleeding risk caused by an excess in access site bleeds, mainly in relation to the femoral approach.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)中女性大出血风险的性别差异。

方法和结果

Rijnmond 联合心脏病学研究注册处旨在评估荷兰 Rijnmond 地区 ACS/PCI 后 DAPT 的应用和结果。共有 1172 名女性(中位年龄 67.5 岁)和 3087 名男性(中位年龄 62.2 岁)因 ACS/PCI 入组,时间为 2011 年 8 月至 2013 年 6 月。基于旨在降低出血风险的个体化区域 DAPT 指南,52.6%的女性和 66.9%的男性接受普拉格雷作为首选 P2Y12 抑制剂,联合阿司匹林。与男性相比,女性使用普拉格雷的禁忌证更常见(47.9% vs. 26.9%,p < 0.001)。与男性相比,女性更常采用股动脉入路(47.6% vs. 38.1%,p < 0.001)。女性 1 年时大出血发生率高于男性(2.6% vs. 1.6%,p = 0.018)。在校正了已知出血风险因素后,女性性别与大出血风险增加两倍以上相关(校正后危险比 2.33;95%置信区间 1.26-4.32)。这种差异在出院时就很明显,并且似乎是由入路部位出血引起的(0.9% vs. 0.1%,p < 0.001)。在 1 年时,未观察到与非入路部位相关的大出血存在性别差异。

结论

接受 DAPT 的 ACS/PCI 女性大出血风险较高,这主要与股动脉入路相关的入路部位出血过多有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/433c/10601701/95e6771eb3c2/mpp-2023-0032-0003-529863_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/433c/10601701/95e6771eb3c2/mpp-2023-0032-0003-529863_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/433c/10601701/95e6771eb3c2/mpp-2023-0032-0003-529863_F01.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex-Related Bleeding Risk in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Aspirin and a P2Y12 Inhibitor.急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受阿司匹林和 P2Y12 抑制剂双联抗血小板治疗的出血风险与性别相关。
Med Princ Pract. 2023;32(3):200-208. doi: 10.1159/000529863. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
2
Long versus short dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor and coronary revascularization: Insights from the RENAMI registry.接受普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中长程与短程双联抗血小板治疗与冠状动脉血运重建:来自 RENAMI 注册研究的结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 May;27(7):696-705. doi: 10.1177/2047487319836327. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
3
Assessing the Clinical Treatment Dynamics of Antiplatelet Therapy Following Acute Coronary Syndrome and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the US.评估美国急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗血小板治疗的临床治疗动态。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e238585. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8585.
4
MULTInational non-interventional study of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with PRimary Angioplasty and Concomitant use of upstream antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel or clopidogrel--the European MULTIPRAC Registry.对接受直接血管成形术并同时使用普拉格雷或氯吡格雷进行上游抗血小板治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的多国非干预性研究——欧洲MULTIPRAC注册研究
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015 Jun;4(3):220-9. doi: 10.1177/2048872614547449. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
5
An Aspirin-Free Versus Dual Antiplatelet Strategy for Coronary Stenting: STOPDAPT-3 Randomized Trial.阿司匹林免与双联抗血小板治疗用于冠状动脉支架置入术的比较:STOPDAPT-3 随机试验。
Circulation. 2024 Feb 20;149(8):585-600. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066720. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
6
Real-world bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and prescribed different combinations of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in England: a population-based cohort study emulating a 'target trial'.在英国,接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 (PCI) 的急性冠状动脉综合征 (ACS) 患者的真实世界出血情况:一项基于人群的队列研究模拟“目标试验”。
Open Heart. 2022 Aug;9(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-001999.
7
Prasugrel-based de-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS): an open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised trial.基于普拉格雷的急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗降级(HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS):一项开放标签、多中心、非劣效性随机试验。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 10;396(10257):1079-1089. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31791-8. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
8
Ischemic and Bleeding Events Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Associated With Low-Dose Prasugrel vs Standard-Dose Clopidogrel Treatment.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中与低剂量普拉格雷与标准剂量氯吡格雷治疗相关的缺血和出血事件。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202004. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2004.
9
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Conventional Dual Antiplatelet Therapy or Aspirin Monotherapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pooled Analysis of the SMART-DATE and SMART-CHOICE Trials.P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与急性冠状动脉综合征中常规双联抗血小板治疗或阿司匹林单药治疗的比较:SMART-DATE 和 SMART-CHOICE 试验的汇总分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jul 1;150:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.03.053. Epub 2021 May 16.
10
Outcomes of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Receiving an Oral Anticoagulant and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Comparison of Clopidogrel Versus Prasugrel From the TRANSLATE-ACS Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者接受口服抗凝和双联抗血小板治疗的结果:来自 TRANSLATE-ACS 研究的氯吡格雷与普拉格雷比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 21;8(14):1880-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.018.

引用本文的文献

1
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Deployment of a Drug-Eluting Stent: The SHARE Randomized Clinical Trial.在药物洗脱支架置入后,P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与双联抗血小板治疗的比较:SHARE 随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e240877. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0877.
2
Sex differences in the management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome-Still an issue of equal treatment?急性冠状动脉综合征的管理和结局中的性别差异 - 仍然是公平待遇的问题吗?
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2023 Dec;135(23-24):663-666. doi: 10.1007/s00508-023-02302-4. Epub 2023 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Women and Men with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pre-specified, Sex-Specific Analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 Trial.替格瑞洛与普拉格雷在急性冠状动脉综合征女性和男性患者中的疗效和安全性:ISAR-REACT 5 试验的预先设定的、基于性别的分析。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022 May 1;29(5):747-761. doi: 10.5551/jat.62776. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.2020年欧洲心脏病学会非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 7;42(14):1289-1367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575.
3
Efficacy and Safety of High Potent P2Y Inhibitors Prasugrel and Ticagrelor in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Treated With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Sex-Specific Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
高活性 P2Y 抑制剂普拉格雷和替格瑞洛在双联抗血小板治疗的冠心病患者中的疗效和安全性:一项基于性别的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Feb 18;9(4):e014457. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014457. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
4
Gender-Related Differences in Antiplatelet Therapy and Impact on 1-Year Clinical Outcome in Patients Presenting With ACS: The START ANTIPLATELET Registry.急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血小板治疗的性别差异及其对1年临床结局的影响:START抗血小板注册研究
Angiology. 2019 Mar;70(3):257-263. doi: 10.1177/0003319718783866. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
5
Is there Sex-related Outcome Difference According to oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 107,126 Patients.急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用口服 P2Y12 抑制剂是否存在与性别相关的结局差异?一项纳入 107126 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2019;17(2):191-203. doi: 10.2174/1570161116666180123092054.
6
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
7
Potent P2Y Inhibitors in Men Versus Women: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.男性与女性中强效的 P2Y12 抑制剂:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 28;69(12):1549-1559. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.028.
8
Sex-related differences in outcomes among men and women under 55 years of age with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from the PROMETHEUS study.年龄小于55岁的急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后结局的性别差异:普罗米修斯研究结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 1;89(4):629-637. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26606. Epub 2016 May 24.
9
Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography/Intervention in Women With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the RIVAL Trial (Radial Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention).女性急性冠状动脉综合征患者行冠状动脉造影/介入治疗时的桡动脉与股动脉入路:来自 RIVAL 试验(冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉与股动脉入路比较)的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):505-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.11.017.
10
A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial.一项基于注册的随机临床试验比较了女性行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时桡动脉和股动脉入路:SAFE-PCI for Women(女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗入路增强研究)试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):857-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.007.