• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替格瑞洛与普拉格雷在急性冠状动脉综合征女性和男性患者中的疗效和安全性:ISAR-REACT 5 试验的预先设定的、基于性别的分析。

Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Women and Men with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pre-specified, Sex-Specific Analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 Trial.

机构信息

Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Cardiology, and Technische Universität München.

German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance.

出版信息

J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022 May 1;29(5):747-761. doi: 10.5551/jat.62776. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

DOI:10.5551/jat.62776
PMID:33867409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9135658/
Abstract

AIM

Sex-specific analyses of direct head-to-head comparisons between newer P2Y inhibitors are limited. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in women and men with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) planned for an invasive strategy.

METHODS

This pre-specified analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial included 956 women and 3,062 men with ACS randomly assigned to either ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary endpoint was the 12-month incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; the safety endpoint was the 12-month incidence of bleeding (type 3-5 according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC]).

RESULTS

The primary endpoint occurred in 42 women (8.9%) in the ticagrelor group and 39 women (8.3%) in the prasugrel group (hazard ratio [HR]=1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.70, P=0.657) and in 142 men (9.4%) in the ticagrelor group and 98 men (6.5%) in the prasugrel group (HR=1.47 [1.13-1.90], P=0.004; P for interaction [P]=0.275). BARC type 3-5 bleeding occurred in 36 women (9.7%) in the ticagrelor group and 34 women (9.7%) in the prasugrel group (HR=1.04 [0.65-1.67], P=0.856) and in 59 men in the ticagrelor group (4.4%) and 46 men (3.6%) in the prasugrel group (HR=1.24 [0.85-1.83], P=0.266; P=0.571).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no significant interaction between sex and treatment effect of study drugs, the superior efficacy of prasugrel was more evident among men. No difference in bleeding between the two study groups was seen for both women and men.

摘要

目的

针对新型 P2Y 抑制剂的直接头对头比较,其性别特异性分析有限。本研究旨在评估替格瑞洛与普拉格雷在计划采用介入策略的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)女性和男性患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

本研究是 ISAR-REACT 5 试验的一项预设分析,共纳入 956 名女性和 3062 名男性 ACS 患者,随机分配至替格瑞洛或普拉格雷组。主要终点为 12 个月时的死亡、心肌梗死或卒中性事件发生率;安全性终点为 12 个月时的出血发生率(根据 Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] 标准为 3-5 型)。

结果

替格瑞洛组有 42 名女性(8.9%)和 39 名女性(8.3%)发生主要终点事件,普拉格雷组分别有 42 名女性(8.9%)和 39 名女性(8.3%)发生主要终点事件(风险比 [HR]=1.10,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.71-1.70,P=0.657);替格瑞洛组有 142 名男性(9.4%)和 98 名男性(6.5%)发生主要终点事件,普拉格雷组分别有 142 名男性(9.4%)和 98 名男性(6.5%)发生主要终点事件(HR=1.47 [1.13-1.90],P=0.004;P 交互检验 [P]=0.275)。替格瑞洛组有 36 名女性(9.7%)和 34 名女性(9.7%)发生 BARC 3-5 型出血,普拉格雷组分别有 36 名女性(9.7%)和 34 名女性(9.7%)发生 BARC 3-5 型出血(HR=1.04 [0.65-1.67],P=0.856);替格瑞洛组有 59 名男性(4.4%)和 46 名男性(3.6%)发生 BARC 3-5 型出血,普拉格雷组分别有 59 名男性(4.4%)和 46 名男性(3.6%)发生 BARC 3-5 型出血(HR=1.24 [0.85-1.83],P=0.266;P=0.571)。

结论

尽管研究药物的性别与治疗效果之间无显著交互作用,但普拉格雷的疗效在男性中更为显著。两组女性和男性患者的出血发生率无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a14/9135658/2d58caa5dd0d/29_62776_6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a14/9135658/07408229e4b9/29_62776_1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a14/9135658/29de002e2412/29_62776_2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a14/9135658/6c157cc8a26f/29_62776_3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a14/9135658/dba8ce02ad94/29_62776_4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a14/9135658/0ea0d6193268/29_62776_5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a14/9135658/2d58caa5dd0d/29_62776_6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a14/9135658/07408229e4b9/29_62776_1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a14/9135658/29de002e2412/29_62776_2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a14/9135658/6c157cc8a26f/29_62776_3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a14/9135658/dba8ce02ad94/29_62776_4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a14/9135658/0ea0d6193268/29_62776_5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a14/9135658/2d58caa5dd0d/29_62776_6.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Women and Men with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pre-specified, Sex-Specific Analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 Trial.替格瑞洛与普拉格雷在急性冠状动脉综合征女性和男性患者中的疗效和安全性:ISAR-REACT 5 试验的预先设定的、基于性别的分析。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022 May 1;29(5):747-761. doi: 10.5551/jat.62776. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
Ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome with off-hour versus on-hour presentation: a subgroup analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial.急性冠状动脉综合征患者非就诊时段与就诊时段应用替格瑞洛或普拉格雷的疗效比较:ISAR-REACT 5 试验亚组分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Apr;112(4):518-528. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02040-z. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
3
Prior Myocardial Infarction and Treatment Effect of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes - A Post-hoc Analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 Trial.心梗病史与替格瑞洛和普拉格雷在急性冠脉综合征患者中的治疗效果 - ISAR-REACT 5 试验的事后分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Dec 20;11(24):e027257. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027257. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
4
Pre-admission antiplatelet therapy and treatment effect of ticagrelor vs. prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes-a subgroup analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial.急性冠状动脉综合征患者入院前抗血小板治疗及替格瑞洛与普拉格雷的治疗效果——ISAR-REACT 5试验的亚组分析
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022 Sep 29;8(7):687-694. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac007.
5
Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in smokers and nonsmokers with acute coronary syndromes.替格瑞洛与普拉格雷在急性冠状动脉综合征的吸烟者和非吸烟者中的疗效和安全性。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Sep 1;338:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
6
Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and High Bleeding Risk.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在急性冠状动脉综合征和高出血风险患者中的应用。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Oct;15(10):e012204. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012204. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
7
Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用。
Circulation. 2020 Dec 15;142(24):2329-2337. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050244. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
8
Association between Platelet Count and Treatment Effect of Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.血小板计数与替格瑞洛或普拉格雷治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疗效的关系。
Thromb Haemost. 2023 Apr;123(4):464-477. doi: 10.1055/a-1988-5047. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
9
Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1524-1534. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908973. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
10
Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes and Diabetes Mellitus.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷用于急性冠脉综合征合并糖尿病患者的研究
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 12;13(19):2238-2247. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.07.032.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-specific outcomes in myocardial infarction: a dual-cohort analysis using clinical and real-world data.心肌梗死中的性别特异性结局:一项使用临床和真实世界数据的双队列分析
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Mar 20. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02627-2.
2
Demographic diversity in platelet function and response to antiplatelet therapy.血小板功能及对抗血小板治疗反应中的人口统计学差异。
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2025 Jan;46(1):78-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2024.11.005. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
3
Sex-Related Bleeding Risk in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Aspirin and a P2Y12 Inhibitor.

本文引用的文献

1
Age- and Weight-Adapted Dose of Prasugrel Versus Standard Dose of Ticagrelor in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes : Results From a Randomized Trial.年龄和体重调整剂量的普拉格雷与替格瑞洛标准剂量在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的比较:一项随机试验的结果。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Sep 15;173(6):436-444. doi: 10.7326/M20-1806. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
2
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计-2020 更新:来自美国心脏协会的报告》。
Circulation. 2020 Mar 3;141(9):e139-e596. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
3
Association of Sex With Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Subgroup Analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS Randomized Clinical Trial.
急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受阿司匹林和 P2Y12 抑制剂双联抗血小板治疗的出血风险与性别相关。
Med Princ Pract. 2023;32(3):200-208. doi: 10.1159/000529863. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的性别与结局的相关性:GLOBAL LEADERS 随机临床试验的亚组分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jan 1;5(1):21-29. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4296.
4
Incidence and predictors of bleeding in ACS patients treated with PCI and prasugrel or ticagrelor: An analysis from the RENAMI registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)联合普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者出血的发生率及预测因素:来自 RENAMI 注册研究的分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Dec 15;273:29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
5
Gender-Related Differences in Antiplatelet Therapy and Impact on 1-Year Clinical Outcome in Patients Presenting With ACS: The START ANTIPLATELET Registry.急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血小板治疗的性别差异及其对1年临床结局的影响:START抗血小板注册研究
Angiology. 2019 Mar;70(3):257-263. doi: 10.1177/0003319718783866. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
6
Is there Sex-related Outcome Difference According to oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 107,126 Patients.急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用口服 P2Y12 抑制剂是否存在与性别相关的结局差异?一项纳入 107126 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2019;17(2):191-203. doi: 10.2174/1570161116666180123092054.
7
Differences in relative and absolute effectiveness of oral P2Y inhibition in men and women: a meta-analysis and modelling study.男女之间口服 P2Y12 抑制剂相对和绝对疗效的差异:一项荟萃分析和模型研究。
Heart. 2018 Apr;104(8):657-664. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312003. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
8
Potent P2Y Inhibitors in Men Versus Women: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.男性与女性中强效的 P2Y12 抑制剂:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 28;69(12):1549-1559. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.028.
9
Sex-related differences in outcomes among men and women under 55 years of age with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from the PROMETHEUS study.年龄小于55岁的急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后结局的性别差异:普罗米修斯研究结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 1;89(4):629-637. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26606. Epub 2016 May 24.
10
Gender Differences in Platelet Reactivity in Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.接受双联抗血小板治疗患者血小板反应性的性别差异
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2016 Apr;30(2):143-50. doi: 10.1007/s10557-016-6646-5.