• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国开放性根治性膀胱切除术:当前的治疗标准——对英国泌尿外科医师协会(BAUS)膀胱切除术审核和医院入院统计(HES)数据的分析。

Open radical cystectomy in England: the current standard of care - an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) cystectomy audit and Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) data.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK.

Department of Urology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):880-885. doi: 10.1111/bju.14143. Epub 2018 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1111/bju.14143
PMID:29359882
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish the current standard for open radical cystectomy (ORC) in England, as data entry by surgeons performing RC to the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) database was mandated in 2013 and combining this with Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) data has allowed comprehensive outcome analysis for the first time.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients were included in this analysis if they were uploaded to the BAUS data registry and reported to have been performed in the 2 years between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2015 in England (from mandate onwards) and had been documented as being performed in an open fashion (not laparoscopic, robot assisted or the technique field left blank). The HES data were accessed via the HES website. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys Classification of Surgical Operations and Procedures version 4 (OPCS-4) Code M34 was searched during the same 2-year time frame (not including M34.4 for simple cystectomy or with additional minimal access codes Y75.1-9 documenting a laparoscopic or robotic approach was used) to assess data capture.

RESULTS

A total of 2 537 ORCs were recorded in the BAUS registry and 3 043 in the HES data. This indicates a capture rate of 83.4% of all cases. The median operative time was 5 h, harvesting a median of 11-20 lymph nodes, with a median blood loss of 500-1 000 mL, and a transfusion rate of 21.8%. The median length of stay was 11 days, with a 30-day mortality rate of 1.58%.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest, contemporary cohort of ORCs in England, encompassing >80% of all performed operations. We now know the current standard for ORC in England. This provides the basis for individual surgeons and units to compare their outcomes and a standard with which future techniques and modifications can be compared.

摘要

目的

建立英国开放性根治性膀胱切除术(ORC)的现行标准,因为 2013 年要求对英国泌尿外科医师协会(BAUS)数据库进行 RC 手术的外科医生进行数据录入,并且首次结合医院住院统计数据(HES)进行了全面的结果分析。

患者和方法

如果患者上传到 BAUS 数据登记处,并报告在 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间在英格兰进行了手术(从任务开始),并且记录为开放性手术(非腹腔镜、机器人辅助或手术技术领域留空),则将所有患者纳入本分析。通过 HES 网站访问 HES 数据。在同一 2 年时间内(不包括 M34.4 用于单纯性膀胱切除术,或附加最小接入代码 Y75.1-9 记录腹腔镜或机器人方法)搜索人口普查和调查办公室手术和程序分类(OPCS-4)第 4 版代码 M34,以评估数据捕获情况。

结果

BAUS 登记处共记录了 2537 例 ORC,HES 数据中记录了 3043 例。这表明所有病例的捕获率为 83.4%。中位手术时间为 5 小时,中位数采集 11-20 个淋巴结,中位失血量为 500-1000ml,输血率为 21.8%。中位住院时间为 11 天,30 天死亡率为 1.58%。

结论

这是英国最大的、当代的 ORC 队列,涵盖了>80%的所有手术。我们现在知道了英国 ORC 的现行标准。这为个别外科医生和单位提供了比较其结果的基础,也为未来的技术和改进提供了比较标准。

相似文献

1
Open radical cystectomy in England: the current standard of care - an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) cystectomy audit and Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) data.英国开放性根治性膀胱切除术:当前的治疗标准——对英国泌尿外科医师协会(BAUS)膀胱切除术审核和医院入院统计(HES)数据的分析。
BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):880-885. doi: 10.1111/bju.14143. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
2
The British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) radical prostatectomy audit 2014/2015 - an update on current practice and outcomes by centre and surgeon case-volume.英国泌尿外科学会(BAUS)2014/2015 年根治性前列腺切除术审核——按中心和外科医生手术量更新当前实践和结果
BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):886-892. doi: 10.1111/bju.14156. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
3
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术围手术期结局和并发症的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):376-401. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
4
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
5
A comparison of preliminary oncologic outcome and postoperative complications between patients undergoing either open or robotic radical cystectomy.接受开放性或机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术患者的初步肿瘤学结局及术后并发症比较。
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Jul-Aug;42(4):663-70. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0393.
6
National comparison of oncologic quality indicators between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy.开放性与机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学质量指标的全国性比较。
Urol Oncol. 2016 Oct;34(10):431.e9-431.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
7
Introduction of robot-assisted radical cystectomy within an established enhanced recovery programme.在既定的强化康复计划中引入机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术。
BJU Int. 2017 Aug;120(2):265-272. doi: 10.1111/bju.13702. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
8
Utilization Trends and Short-term Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的应用趋势及短期疗效
Urology. 2017 May;103:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.10.067. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
9
Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较疗效
Urol Oncol. 2018 Mar;36(3):88.e1-88.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
10
Robotic Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion Does Not Show a Benefit over Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体外尿流改道术相较于开放性根治性膀胱切除术并无优势:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 7;11(11):e0166221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166221. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Posterior conduit fixation with retroperitonealization of uretero-ileal anastomosis after open radical cystectomy reduces the postoperative complication rate: a retrospective, matched-paired single-center analysis.开放性根治性膀胱切除术后采用输尿管-回肠吻合术腹膜后化进行后尿道固定可降低术后并发症发生率:一项回顾性、配对单中心分析。
BMC Urol. 2025 Jul 15;25(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01869-6.
2
Randomized Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Transurethral Resection for Staging New Bladder Cancers: Results From the Prospective BladderPath Trial.磁共振成像与经尿道切除术用于新诊断膀胱癌分期的随机对照比较:前瞻性膀胱路径试验的结果
J Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr 20;43(12):1417-1428. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02398. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
3
The impact of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) in a large contemporary cohort of patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion (RARC-ICUD).
心肺运动试验(CPET)和查尔森合并症指数(CCI)对接受机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术和体内尿流改道术(RARC-ICUD)的大量当代患者队列的影响。
BJUI Compass. 2022 Oct 7;4(2):187-194. doi: 10.1002/bco2.191. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Diagnosis, treatment and survival from bladder, upper urinary tract, and urethral cancers: real-world findings from NHS England between 2013 and 2019.膀胱癌、上尿路和尿道癌的诊断、治疗和生存:2013 年至 2019 年英国国家医疗服务体系的真实数据。
BJU Int. 2023 Jun;131(6):734-744. doi: 10.1111/bju.15970. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
5
Case of the month from the University of Sheffield, UK: Expediting definitive treatment in patients with invasive bladder cancer: an MRI-guided pathway.英国谢菲尔德大学本月病例:加快浸润性膀胱癌患者的确定性治疗:一种磁共振成像引导路径
BJU Int. 2022 Jun;129(6):691-694. doi: 10.1111/bju.15730.
6
Effect of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion vs Open Radical Cystectomy on 90-Day Morbidity and Mortality Among Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与体外尿路分流术对比开放性根治性膀胱切除术对膀胱癌患者 90 天内发病率和死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Jun 7;327(21):2092-2103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.7393.
7
Radical Cystectomy in England from 2013 to 2019 on 12,644 patients: An analysis of national trends and comparison of surgical approaches using Hospital Episode Statistics data.2013年至2019年英格兰12644例患者的根治性膀胱切除术:利用医院病历统计数据对全国趋势及手术方式比较的分析
BJUI Compass. 2021 Mar 12;2(5):338-347. doi: 10.1002/bco2.79. eCollection 2021 Sep.
8
Defining Factors Associated with High-quality Surgery Following Radical Cystectomy: Analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Cystectomy Audit.根治性膀胱切除术后高质量手术的相关定义因素:英国泌尿外科医师协会膀胱切除术审计分析
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021 Sep 20;33:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.08.005. eCollection 2021 Nov.
9
Development and validation of a follow-up methodology for a randomised controlled trial, utilising routine clinical data as an alternative to traditional designs: a pilot study to assess the feasibility of use for the BladderPath trial.利用常规临床数据作为传统设计的替代方案,进行一项随机对照试验随访方法的开发与验证:一项评估用于膀胱路径试验可行性的试点研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Oct 31;6(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00713-y.
10
Open radical cystectomy: lessons from the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) registry.开放性根治性膀胱切除术:来自英国泌尿外科医师协会(BAUS)登记处的经验教训。
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Aug;7(4):745-748. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.06.18.