Rick and Tina Caruso Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018 May;8(5):648-654. doi: 10.1002/alr.22078. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
In this work we assess the association between olfactory dysfunction and cognition in a nationally representative sample of older adults in the United States.
Participants aged ≥60 years (n = 1236) from the 2013-2014 National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey underwent both olfactory and cognitive testing. Olfaction was assessed by both objective test (8-odor Pocket Smell Test: smell impairment defined as score ≤2) and self-report. Cognitive assessment consisted of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), the Animal Fluency Test, and the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Regression models were used to examine the association between olfaction and cognition while adjusting for demographics, cardiovascular factors, and associated medical history.
The prevalence of smell impairment in US older adults was 18.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.0-22.0%) and 22.0% (95% CI, 18.5-25.6%) based on objective smell test and self-report, respectively. In a multivariate model adjusted for relevant factors, low smell test scores were consistently associated with low scores on cognitive assessments, with a DSST score difference of -1.5 (95% CI, -2.2 to -0.8), Animal Fluency Test score difference of -0.4 (95% CI, -0.7 to -0.1), and CERAD Word List score difference of -0.4 (95% CI, -0.6 to -0.2) per 1-point decrease in smell test score. There was no association between self-reported smell impairment and cognition.
Objectively measured olfactory dysfunction is independently associated with cognitive impairment. These findings are consistent with previous studies and suggest the utility of objective olfactory tests as an indicator for cognitive impairment as compared with self-reported olfactory dysfunction, which is an uncertain indicator.
本研究在美国全国代表性的老年人群体中评估了嗅觉功能障碍与认知之间的相关性。
来自 2013-2014 年全国健康和营养调查的 60 岁及以上(n=1236)参与者接受了嗅觉和认知测试。嗅觉通过客观测试(8 气味口袋嗅觉测试:得分≤2 定义为嗅觉障碍)和自我报告进行评估。认知评估包括数字符号替代测试(DSST)、动物流畅性测试和阿尔茨海默病建立登记处联盟(CERAD)。回归模型用于在调整人口统计学、心血管因素和相关病史后,检查嗅觉与认知之间的关联。
美国老年人嗅觉障碍的患病率分别为客观嗅觉测试的 18.0%(95%置信区间[CI],14.0-22.0%)和自我报告的 22.0%(95% CI,18.5-25.6%)。在调整相关因素的多变量模型中,低嗅觉测试分数与认知评估的低分数始终相关,DSST 分数差异为-1.5(95%CI,-2.2 至-0.8),动物流畅性测试分数差异为-0.4(95%CI,-0.7 至-0.1),CERAD 单词列表分数差异为-0.4(95%CI,-0.6 至-0.2),每降低 1 分嗅觉测试分数。自我报告的嗅觉障碍与认知之间没有关联。
客观测量的嗅觉功能障碍与认知障碍独立相关。这些发现与之前的研究一致,表明与自我报告的嗅觉功能障碍相比,客观嗅觉测试作为认知障碍的指标具有实用性,而自我报告的嗅觉功能障碍是一个不确定的指标。