Suppr超能文献

嗅觉与执行认知能力:一项系统综述。

Olfaction and Executive Cognitive Performance: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Challakere Ramaswamy Vasudeva Murthy, Schofield Peter William

机构信息

School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.

Neuropsychiatry Service, Hunter New England Mental Health, New Lambton, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 May 9;13:871391. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871391. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Objective tests of olfaction are widely available to aid in the assessment of olfaction. Their clearest role is in the characterization of olfactory changes, either reported by or suspected in a patient. There is a rapidly growing literature concerned with the association of olfactory changes with certain neuropsychiatric conditions and the use of olfactory testing to supplement conventional assessments in clinical and research practice is evolving. Neural pathways important for olfactory processing overlap extensively with pathways important for cognitive functioning, and especially those important for executive functioning, many of which are concentrated in the frontal lobes. Previous work has identified associations between performance on certain olfactory tests (most frequently olfactory identification) and executive functioning and behavioral measures (e.g. of impulsivity). More recently, similar associations have also been identified in non-clinical samples, raising new questions as to the utility of olfactory test scores as proxy measures for non-olfactory phenomena. In this systemic review, we sought to identify studies, both clinical and non-clinical, that investigated the associations of olfaction with performance on tasks sensitive to frontal lobe functioning. Our search criteria led to the identification of 70 studies published in English. We examined in detail and tabulated the data from these studies, highlighted each study's key findings, and critically evaluated these studies. We use the results of this review to reflect on some of the current and future challenges concerning the use of olfactory testing in clinical neuropsychiatric practice and research and speculate on the potential benefits of administering phonemic fluency in combination with olfactory testing to enhance its predictive value.

摘要

嗅觉客观测试广泛可用,有助于嗅觉评估。其最明确的作用是对患者报告的或怀疑存在的嗅觉变化进行特征描述。关于嗅觉变化与某些神经精神疾病的关联以及在临床和研究实践中使用嗅觉测试来补充传统评估的文献正在迅速增加。对嗅觉处理重要的神经通路与对认知功能重要的通路广泛重叠,尤其是对执行功能重要的通路,其中许多集中在额叶。先前的研究已经确定了某些嗅觉测试(最常见的是嗅觉识别)的表现与执行功能和行为指标(如冲动性)之间的关联。最近,在非临床样本中也发现了类似的关联,这就引发了关于嗅觉测试分数作为非嗅觉现象替代指标的效用的新问题。在这项系统评价中,我们试图确定临床和非临床研究,这些研究调查了嗅觉与对额叶功能敏感的任务表现之间的关联。我们的搜索标准导致识别出70篇英文发表的研究。我们详细检查并将这些研究的数据制成表格,突出每项研究的主要发现,并对这些研究进行严格评估。我们利用这项评价的结果来思考目前和未来在临床神经精神实践和研究中使用嗅觉测试所面临的一些挑战,并推测将语音流畅性测试与嗅觉测试结合使用以提高其预测价值的潜在益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b76f/9125097/3c2eb9647673/fpsyg-13-871391-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验