Training and Research Support Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe
Policy Research and Advocacy, Tax Justice Network Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-011820.
Universal healthcare services funded through taxation and free at point-of-access are the most equitable ways of funding healthcare rights. This paper examines key public sector health financing measures in 17 East and Southern African (ESA) countries, estimates the funding gap for basic and comprehensive services and relates this to sources of lost tax revenue.
Health financing and tax data for 2018 (the most recent year available) were extracted from international databases for each ESA country, and analysed collectively for the region, comparing against intergovernmental estimates of optimal funding and tax capacity. Despite limitations noted, the scale of the health financing gap and tax losses informed policy recommendations.
The annual average per capita financing gap ranged from $28 to $84 for basic to comprehensive services, respectively, applying estimates of funding needs. Many innovative financing measures being explored do not meet this scale of deficit. Annual ESA per capita tax losses were estimated as: US$34.20 from shortfalls in domestic tax capacity and US$13.80 from illicit financial flows largely due to commercial practices. A proposed 25% minimum effective tax rate on multinationals in a fairer global tax system would yield an additional annual collection US$26.20 in the region.
Addressing a total annual tax loss of US$34 billion from these three sources alone would almost completely finance the region's US$36 billion financing gap for a comprehensive public sector health system. The COVID-19 pandemic's exposure of the need for investment in public sector services suggests an opportunity for an alliance between health and finance sectors to ensure progressive taxation as the core funding for an equitable, universal health system. This implies costing the health funding demands and gap in ESA countries; strengthening domestic tax capacity, expanding wealth taxes, curbing illicit outflows and providing health evidence to ongoing African diplomacy for a fairer global tax system.
通过税收为全民医疗服务供资并实现医疗服务免费获取,是实现医疗保健权益公平分配的最有效途径。本文考察了 17 个东非和南部非洲(ESA)国家的主要公共部门卫生筹资措施,评估了基本和综合服务的筹资缺口,并将其与税收损失的来源联系起来。
从国际数据库中提取了每个 ESA 国家 2018 年(可获得的最近年份)的卫生筹资和税收数据,并对该区域进行了集体分析,同时对照政府间对最佳筹资和税收能力的估计进行了比较。尽管存在局限性,但卫生筹资缺口和税收损失的规模为政策建议提供了依据。
按基本服务和综合服务计算,每年人均筹资缺口平均分别为 28 美元至 84 美元,这是根据筹资需求的估计值得出的。许多正在探索的创新性筹资措施无法满足这一规模的赤字。每年 ESA 人均税收损失估计为:国内税收能力缺口造成 34.20 美元,商业惯例造成的非法资金外流造成 13.80 美元。在更公平的全球税收体系中,对跨国公司征收 25%的最低有效税率,将使该地区每年额外增加 26.20 亿美元的收入。
仅从这三个来源解决每年 340 亿美元的税收损失,就几乎可以完全为该地区全面的公共部门卫生系统筹资 360 亿美元的筹资缺口提供资金。新冠肺炎疫情暴露了公共部门服务投资的必要性,这为卫生和金融部门建立联盟提供了机会,以确保累进税成为公平、全民健康系统的核心供资。这意味着需要核算 ESA 国家的卫生筹资需求和缺口,加强国内税收能力,扩大财富税,遏制非法外流,并为更公平的全球税收体系向正在进行的非洲外交提供卫生证据。