相似文献
1
Reply to Safra et al.: Lack of theoretical rationale and selective analysis does not imply no strong evidence.对萨夫拉等人的回复：缺乏理论依据和选择性分析并不意味着没有有力证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 6;115(6):E1078-E1079. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1722116115. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
2
"Combined weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel as primary treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma" Safra T, et al (Gynecol Oncol 2009; 114:215-218).“联合使用卡铂和紫杉醇每周给药作为晚期上皮性卵巢癌的一线治疗方案” 萨夫拉 T 等人（《妇科肿瘤学》2009 年；114 卷：215 - 218 页）
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Dec;115(3):514; author reply 514-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
3
When selective adaptation and contrast effects are distinct: a reply to Diehl, Kluender, and Parker.当选择性适应和对比效应明显时：对迪尔、克伦德和帕克的回应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1985 Apr;11(2):242-56.
4
Adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy: strong emotions decide but rationale studies are needed: in regard to Brown et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;70:1305-1309). In reply to Drs. Larson and Sahgal.辅助性全脑放疗：强烈的情感因素起决定作用，但仍需进行理论研究：回应布朗等人（《国际放射肿瘤学、生物学、物理学杂志》2008年；70:1305 - 1309）。回应拉尔森博士和萨加尔博士。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Sep 1;75(1):316-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.079.
5
6
Putative null distributions corresponding to tests of differential expression in the Golden Spike dataset are intensity dependent.与金标准数据集差异表达检验相对应的假定零分布是强度依赖性的。
BMC Genomics. 2007 Apr 19;8:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-105.
7
MHC loss in colorectal tumours: evidence for immunoselection?结直肠肿瘤中的MHC缺失：免疫选择的证据？
Cancer Surv. 1992;13:155-71.
8
Personal standards and evaluative concerns dimensions of "clinical" perfectionism: a reply to Shafran et al. (2002, 2003) and Hewitt et al. (2003).“临床”完美主义的个人标准与评价性关注维度：对沙夫兰等人（2002年、2003年）及休伊特等人（2003年）的回应
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Jan;44(1):63-84. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.12.004.
9
Neurodevelopmental effects of decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) and implications for the reference dose.十溴二苯醚（BDE-209）的神经发育效应及其对参考剂量的影响
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2009 Jun;54(1):91-104. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.02.006. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
10
The belief bias effect is aptly named: a reply to Klauer and Kellen (2011).信念偏差效应名副其实：对克劳尔和凯伦（2011）的回应。
Psychol Rev. 2011 Jan;118(1):155-63. doi: 10.1037/a0021774.
本文引用的文献
1
No strong evidence that authoritarian attitudes are driven by a lack of control.没有确凿证据表明专制态度是由缺乏控制力所驱动的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 6;115(6):E1076-E1077. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721565115. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
2
When the appeal of a dominant leader is greater than a prestige leader.当一个有支配力的领导者的吸引力大于一个有声望的领导者时。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 27;114(26):6734-6739. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617711114. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
3
Seeking structure in social organization: compensatory control and the psychological advantages of hierarchy.在社会组织中寻求结构：补偿控制与等级制度的心理优势。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Apr;106(4):590-609. doi: 10.1037/a0035620. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
4
Commentary on "Mediation Analysis and Categorical Variables: The Final Frontier" by Dawn Iacobucci.对道恩·亚科布奇所著《中介分析与分类变量：最后的前沿》的评论
J Consum Psychol. 2012 Oct 1;22(4):600-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
5
For God (or) country: the hydraulic relation between government instability and belief in religious sources of control.为了上帝（或）国家：政府不稳定与信仰宗教控制来源之间的水力关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Nov;99(5):725-39. doi: 10.1037/a0021140.
Zotero 插件