Suppr超能文献

文化与姑息治疗:偏好、沟通、意义和共同决策。

Culture and Palliative Care: Preferences, Communication, Meaning, and Mutual Decision Making.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Department of Medicine, Division of Haematology and Medical Oncology, New York University Medical School, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 May;55(5):1408-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

Abstract

Palliative care is gaining acceptance across the world. However, even when palliative care resources exist, both the delivery and distribution of services too often are neither equitably nor acceptably provided to diverse population groups. The goal of this study was to illustrate tensions in the delivery of palliative care for diverse patient populations to help clinicians to improve care for all. We begin by defining and differentiating culture, race, and ethnicity, so that these terms-often used interchangeably-are not conflated and are more effectively used in caring for diverse populations. We then present examples from an integrative literature review of recent research on culture and palliative care to illustrate both how and why varied responses to pain and suffering occur in different patterns, focusing on four areas of palliative care: the formation of care preferences, communication patterns, different meanings of suffering, and decision-making processes about care. For each area, we provide international and multiethnic examples of variations that emphasize the need for personalization of care and the avoidance of stereotyping beliefs and practices without considering individual circumstances and life histories. We conclude with recommendations for improving palliative care research and practice with cultural perspectives, emphasizing the need to work in partnerships with patients, their family members, and communities to identify and negotiate culturally meaningful care, promote quality of life, and ensure the highest quality palliative care for all, both domestically and internationally.

摘要

姑息治疗在全球范围内越来越被接受。然而,即使姑息治疗资源存在,服务的提供和分配也常常既不公平也不能被不同人群群体所接受。本研究的目的是说明为不同患者群体提供姑息治疗中的紧张关系,以帮助临床医生改善对所有人的护理。我们首先定义和区分文化、种族和民族,以便这些术语(通常互换使用)不会混淆,并在照顾不同人群时更有效地使用。然后,我们从最近关于文化和姑息治疗的综合文献综述中呈现了一些例子,来说明在不同模式下对疼痛和痛苦的不同反应是如何以及为什么发生的,重点关注姑息治疗的四个领域:护理偏好的形成、沟通模式、痛苦的不同含义以及护理决策过程。对于每个领域,我们提供国际和多民族的例子,强调需要个性化护理,避免在不考虑个人情况和生活史的情况下对信仰和实践进行刻板印象。我们最后提出了从文化角度改善姑息治疗研究和实践的建议,强调需要与患者、他们的家庭成员和社区合作,以确定和协商具有文化意义的护理,促进生活质量,并确保在国内外为所有人提供最高质量的姑息治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验