Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Trip Database Ltd.
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Feb;23(1):23-24. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110884.
This article is part of a series featured from the Catalogue of Bias introduced in this volume of Evidence-Based Medicine that describes biases and outlines their potential impact in research studies. Observer bias is systematic discrepancy from the truth during the process of observing and recording information for a study. Many healthcare observations are at risk of this bias. Evidence shows that treatment effect estimates can be exaggerated by a third to two-thirds in the presence of observer bias in outcome assessment. Preventing observer bias involves proper masking in intervention studies including the use of matched placebo interventions where appropriate and training of observers to make assessment consistent and reduce biases resulting from conscious or unconscious prejudices. Where observers are involved in a research study, it is probably not possible for the study to be entirely free of observer biases.
这篇文章是本卷《循证医学》中介绍的偏倚目录的一部分,描述了偏倚并概述了它们在研究中的潜在影响。观察者偏倚是在观察和记录研究信息过程中系统性地偏离真实情况。许多医疗保健观察都存在这种偏倚的风险。有证据表明,在结局评估中存在观察者偏倚的情况下,治疗效果的估计值可能夸大三分之一到三分之二。预防观察者偏倚需要在干预研究中进行适当的设盲,包括在适当的情况下使用匹配的安慰剂干预,以及对观察者进行培训,使评估具有一致性并减少因有意识或无意识的偏见而导致的偏倚。只要有观察者参与研究,研究就不太可能完全没有观察者偏倚。