• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴雷特食管筛查中患者偏好和耐受性的比较评估:一项随机试验的结果。

Comparative Assessment of Patient Preferences and Tolerability in Barrett Esophagus Screening: Results From a Randomized Trial.

机构信息

Divisions of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov/Dec;52(10):880-884. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000991.

DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000000991
PMID:29369237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6056346/
Abstract

GOALS

To determine patient preference for the Barrett esophagus (BE) screening techniques.

BACKGROUND

Sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (sEGD) and unsedated transnasal endoscopy (uTNE) are both potential techniques for BE screening. However, systematic assessment of patient preference for these 2 techniques is lacking. As part of a comparative effectiveness randomized trial of BE screening modalities, we measured short-term patient preferences for the following approaches: in-clinic uTNE (huTNE), mobile-based uTNE (muTNE), and sEGD using a novel assessment instrument.

STUDY

Consenting community patients without known BE were randomly assigned to receive huTNE, muTNE, or sEGD, followed by a telephone administered preference and tolerability assessment instrument 24 hours after study procedures. Patient preference was measured by the waiting trade-off method.

RESULTS

In total, 201 patients completed screening with huTNE (n=71), muTNE (n=71), or sEGD (n=59), and a telephone interview. Patients' preferences for sEGD and uTNE using the waiting trade-off method were comparable (P=0.51). Although tolerability scores were superior for sEGD (P<0.001) compared with uTNE, scores for uTNE examinations were acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient preference is comparable between sEGD and uTNE for diagnostic examinations conducted in an endoscopy suite or in a mobile setting. Given acceptable tolerability, uTNE may be a viable alternative to sEGD for BE screening.

摘要

目的

确定患者对 Barrett 食管(BE)筛查技术的偏好。

背景

镇静食管胃十二指肠镜检查(sEGD)和非镇静经鼻内镜检查(uTNE)都是 BE 筛查的潜在技术。然而,缺乏对这两种技术的患者偏好的系统评估。作为 BE 筛查方式的一项比较效果随机试验的一部分,我们使用一种新的评估工具来衡量以下方法的短期患者偏好:门诊 uTNE(huTNE)、移动 uTNE(muTNE)和 sEGD。

研究

同意参加的社区患者无已知 BE 被随机分配接受 huTNE、muTNE 或 sEGD,然后在研究程序后 24 小时通过电话进行偏好和耐受性评估工具。患者偏好通过等待权衡法进行测量。

结果

共有 201 例患者完成了 huTNE(n=71)、muTNE(n=71)或 sEGD(n=59)筛查,并接受了电话采访。使用等待权衡法,患者对 sEGD 和 uTNE 的偏好相当(P=0.51)。尽管 sEGD 的耐受性评分明显优于 uTNE(P<0.001),但 uTNE 检查的评分是可以接受的。

结论

在内镜室或移动环境中进行诊断性检查时,患者对 sEGD 和 uTNE 的偏好相当。鉴于 uTNE 具有可接受的耐受性,uTNE 可能是 BE 筛查的 sEGD 替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0015/6056346/ec58e579c343/nihms929476f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0015/6056346/b7a76fc233ab/nihms929476f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0015/6056346/ec58e579c343/nihms929476f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0015/6056346/b7a76fc233ab/nihms929476f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0015/6056346/ec58e579c343/nihms929476f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Assessment of Patient Preferences and Tolerability in Barrett Esophagus Screening: Results From a Randomized Trial.巴雷特食管筛查中患者偏好和耐受性的比较评估:一项随机试验的结果。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov/Dec;52(10):880-884. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000991.
2
Costs associated with Barrett's esophagus screening in the community: an economic analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial of sedated versus hospital unsedated versus mobile community unsedated endoscopy.与社区 Barrett 食管筛查相关的成本:一项镇静与医院非镇静与移动社区非镇静内镜前瞻性随机对照试验的经济学分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):88-94.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.019. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
3
A randomized comparative effectiveness trial of novel endoscopic techniques and approaches for Barrett's esophagus screening in the community.一项针对社区中 Barrett 食管筛查的新型内镜技术和方法的随机对照有效性试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;110(1):148-58. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.362. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
4
Population screening for barrett esophagus: a prospective randomized pilot study.人群筛查 Barrett 食管:一项前瞻性随机试验研究。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Dec;86(12):1174-80. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0396.
5
Unsedated Transnasal Endoscopy (uTNE): Not Quite Ready to Replace Sedated Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (sEGD).非镇静经鼻内镜检查(uTNE):尚未准备好取代镇静食管胃十二指肠镜检查(sEGD)。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun;110(6):936-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.121.
6
Screening for Barrett's esophagus: results from a population-based survey.巴雷特食管筛查:基于人群的调查结果。
Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Aug;59(8):1831-50. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3092-8. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
7
Unsedated transnasal endoscopy for the detection of Barrett's esophagus: systematic review and meta-analysis.经鼻非镇静内镜检查用于 Barrett 食管的检测:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2023 Jan 28;36(2). doi: 10.1093/dote/doac045.
8
Unsedated Transnasal Endoscopy: A Safe, Well-Tolerated and Accurate Alternative to Standard Diagnostic Peroral Endoscopy.清醒经鼻内镜检查:一种安全、耐受良好且准确的替代标准诊断经口内镜检查的方法。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jun;67(6):1937-1947. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07432-9. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
9
Performance characteristics of unsedated ultrathin video endoscopy in the assessment of the upper GI tract: systematic review and meta-analysis.非镇静超薄视频内镜在上消化道评估中的性能特征:系统评价与荟萃分析
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Nov;82(5):782-92. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.07.016. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
10
Acceptability to patients of screening disposable transnasal endoscopy: qualitative interview analysis.患者对一次性经鼻内镜筛查的可接受性:定性访谈分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):e030467. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030467.

引用本文的文献

1
Public acceptance and uptake of oesophageal adenocarcinoma screening strategies: A mixed-methods systematic review.公众对食管腺癌筛查策略的接受度与采用情况:一项混合方法的系统评价。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Apr 4;46:101367. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101367. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Acceptability to patients of screening disposable transnasal endoscopy: qualitative interview analysis.患者对一次性经鼻内镜筛查的可接受性:定性访谈分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):e030467. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030467.
3
Miniature gastrointestinal endoscopy: Now and the future.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative quality assessment of esophageal examination with transnasal and sedated endoscopy.经鼻内镜检查与镇静内镜检查对食管检查的质量比较评估
Endosc Int Open. 2017 May;5(5):E340-E344. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-122008.
2
Costs associated with Barrett's esophagus screening in the community: an economic analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial of sedated versus hospital unsedated versus mobile community unsedated endoscopy.与社区 Barrett 食管筛查相关的成本:一项镇静与医院非镇静与移动社区非镇静内镜前瞻性随机对照试验的经济学分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):88-94.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.019. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
3
微型胃肠内镜:现在与未来。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug 14;25(30):4051-4060. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i30.4051.
4
Novel Screening Tests for Barrett's Esophagus.巴雷特食管的新型筛查试验
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2019 Jul 25;21(9):42. doi: 10.1007/s11894-019-0710-9.
Putting it Through the Nose: The Ins and Outs of Transnasal Endoscopy.
经鼻而入:鼻内镜检查的来龙去脉
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct;111(10):1371-1373. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.334. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
4
ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.美国胃肠病学会临床指南:巴雷特食管的诊断与管理
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;111(1):30-50; quiz 51. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.322. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
5
Performance characteristics of unsedated ultrathin video endoscopy in the assessment of the upper GI tract: systematic review and meta-analysis.非镇静超薄视频内镜在上消化道评估中的性能特征:系统评价与荟萃分析
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Nov;82(5):782-92. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.07.016. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
6
A randomized comparative effectiveness trial of novel endoscopic techniques and approaches for Barrett's esophagus screening in the community.一项针对社区中 Barrett 食管筛查的新型内镜技术和方法的随机对照有效性试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;110(1):148-58. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.362. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
7
Randomized crossover study comparing efficacy of transnasal endoscopy with that of standard endoscopy to detect Barrett's esophagus.随机交叉研究比较经鼻内镜与标准内镜检测 Barrett 食管的疗效。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 May;75(5):954-61. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.029. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
8
Epidemiology and natural history of intestinal metaplasia of the gastroesophageal junction and Barrett's esophagus: a population-based study.胃食管交界处和 Barrett 食管肠上皮化生的流行病学和自然史:一项基于人群的研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Aug;106(8):1447-55; quiz 1456. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.130. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
9
Quality-of-life assessment of fibroid treatment options and outcomes.子宫肌瘤治疗方法及效果的生活质量评估。
Radiology. 2011 Jun;259(3):785-92. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11100704. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
10
Cardiovascular tolerance and autonomic nervous responses in unsedated upper gastrointestinal small-caliber endoscopy: a comparison between transnasal and peroral procedures with newly developed mouthpiece.未镇静的上消化道小口径内镜检查中的心血管耐受性和自主神经反应:经鼻与经口操作新开发的口腔内操作器械的比较
Dig Endosc. 2011 Jan;23(1):78-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.01064.x.