King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, SE59PJ, London, UK.
Italian National Institute of Statistics, Rome, Italy.
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-2951-x.
With over 1 million HIV-related deaths annually, quality end-of-life care remains a priority. Given strong public preference for home death, place of death is an important consideration for quality care. This 11 country study aimed to i) describe the number, proportion of all deaths, and demographics of HIV-related deaths; ii) identify place of death; iii) compare place of death to cancer patients iv), determine patient/health system factors associated with place of HIV-related death.
In this retrospective analysis of death certification, data were extracted for the full population (ICD-10 codes B20-B24) for 1-year period: deceased's demographic characteristics, place of death, healthcare supply.
i) 19,739 deaths were attributed to HIV. The highest proportion (per 1000 deaths) was for Mexico (9.8‰), and the lowest Sweden (0.2‰). The majority of deaths were among men (75%), and those aged <50 (69.1%). ii) Hospital was most common place of death in all countries: from 56.6% in the Netherlands to 90.9% in South Korea. The least common places were hospice facility (3.3%-5.7%), nursing home (0%-17.6%) and home (5.9%-26.3%).iii) Age-standardised relative risks found those with HIV less likely to die at home and more likely to die in hospital compared with cancer patients, and in most countries more likely to die in a nursing home. iv) Multivariate analysis found that men were more likely to die at home in UK, Canada, USA and Mexico; a greater number of hospital beds reduced the likelihood of dying at home in Italy and Mexico; a higher number of GPs was associated with home death in Italy and Mexico.
With increasing comorbidity among people ageing with HIV, it is essential that end-of-life preferences are established and met. Differences in place of death according to country and diagnosis demonstrate the importance of ensuring a "good death" for people with HIV, alongside efforts to optimise treatment.
每年有超过 100 万与艾滋病相关的死亡,因此优质的临终关怀仍然是当务之急。鉴于公众强烈倾向于在家中离世,死亡地点是优质关怀的一个重要考虑因素。这项涉及 11 个国家的研究旨在:i)描述与艾滋病相关的死亡人数、在所有死亡人数中的比例和死亡人群的人口统计学特征;ii)确定死亡地点;iii)将死亡地点与癌症患者进行比较;iv)确定与与艾滋病相关的死亡地点相关的患者/卫生系统因素。
在这项对死亡证明的回顾性分析中,提取了为期 1 年的全人群(ICD-10 编码 B20-B24)的人口统计学特征、死亡地点和医疗保健供应数据。
i)共有 19739 人死于艾滋病。每 1000 例死亡中,墨西哥的比例最高(9.8‰),瑞典的比例最低(0.2‰)。大多数死亡发生在男性(75%)和年龄<50 岁的人群中(69.1%)。ii)在所有国家,医院都是最常见的死亡地点:从荷兰的 56.6%到韩国的 90.9%。最不常见的地点是临终关怀机构(3.3%-5.7%)、养老院(0%-17.6%)和家中(5.9%-26.3%)。iii)年龄标准化相对风险发现,与癌症患者相比,艾滋病患者更不可能在家中死亡,更有可能在医院死亡,并且在大多数国家,他们更有可能在养老院死亡。iv)多变量分析发现,在英国、加拿大、美国和墨西哥,男性更有可能在家中死亡;意大利和墨西哥的医院病床数量越多,在家中死亡的可能性就越小;意大利和墨西哥的家庭医生数量越多,与在家中死亡相关。
随着感染艾滋病的人群年龄的增长,合并症的发病率也越来越高,因此确定和满足临终关怀的偏好至关重要。根据国家和诊断的不同,死亡地点的差异表明,必须确保艾滋病毒感染者享有“善终”,同时努力优化治疗。