Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Parks College of Engineering, Aviation and Technology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO.
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Feb;32 Suppl 1:S18-S24. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001083.
Recent clinical study suggests an advantage to adding an iliosacral screw to the anterior fixation construct for anteroposterior compression type-2 (OTA/AO type 61-B1), partially unstable open-book pelvic ring injuries. Others have described stress examination to determine any required supplemental fixation. However, biomechanical studies investigating iliosacral fixation requirements for this injury are lacking. Our objective was to determine whether adding an iliosacral screw to symphyseal plate fixation decreases displacement in a well-defined open-book pelvic ring injury model.
An open-book pelvic ring injury was created in 10 human cadaveric pelves by unilaterally releasing the sacrospinous, sacrotuberous, and anterior sacroiliac ligaments plus transection of the pubic symphysis, approximating the classically described anteroposterior compression type-2 (APC-2) injury. Specimens were divided into 2 groups: (1) symphyseal plating and (2) plating plus an iliosacral screw. Using a standard bilateral stance model loaded at 550 N, displacement measurements were obtained at 210,000 and 500,000 cycles.
Three specimens failed before 210,000 cycles because of technical errors and were excluded from analysis. For the remaining 7, there was no significant difference in displacement between the 2 groups, and none sustained implant failure. Post hoc analysis showed that a large sample size (45/group) would be required to detect any difference with 80% power, indicating a small effect size with limited clinical application.
Adding an iliosacral screw to the symphyseal plate fixation does not provide improved biomechanical outcome in classically described APC-2 injuries. Clinically, stress examination may be useful to determine the need for supplemental posterior fixation in APC-2 injuries.
最近的临床研究表明,对于前环固定中存在前后向压缩型 2 型(OTA/AO 型 61-B1)、部分不稳定的耻骨联合分离的骨盆环损伤,在前环中增加髂骨螺钉固定具有优势。其他人已经描述了应力检查以确定是否需要补充固定。然而,对于这种损伤,缺乏对髂骨螺钉固定要求的生物力学研究。我们的目的是确定在明确的耻骨联合分离骨盆环损伤模型中,增加骶髂螺钉固定是否可以减少位移。
通过单侧释放骶棘、骶结节和前骶髂韧带以及耻骨联合横断,创建了耻骨联合分离骨盆环损伤,模拟了经典描述的前后向压缩 2 型(APC-2)损伤。标本分为 2 组:(1)耻骨联合钢板固定;(2)钢板加髂骨螺钉固定。使用标准双侧站立模型,在 550N 下加载,在 210,000 和 500,000 个循环时测量位移。
由于技术误差,有 3 个标本在达到 210,000 个循环之前失效,因此被排除在分析之外。对于其余的 7 个标本,2 组之间的位移没有显著差异,且没有发生植入物失效。事后分析表明,需要 45 个/组的大样本量才能以 80%的功率检测到任何差异,表明在临床上应用效果较小。
在经典描述的 APC-2 损伤中,在耻骨联合钢板固定中增加髂骨螺钉固定并不能提供更好的生物力学效果。临床上,应力检查可能有助于确定 APC-2 损伤是否需要补充后环固定。