Suppr超能文献

计算纽约州基于普查区的预期寿命:一种可推广的方法。

Calculating census tract-based life expectancy in New York state: a generalizable approach.

作者信息

Talbot Thomas O, Done Douglas H, Babcock Gwen D

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Albany School of Public Health, Rensselaer, NY, USA.

Bureau of Environmental and Occupational Epidemiology, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA.

出版信息

Popul Health Metr. 2018 Jan 26;16(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12963-018-0159-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Life expectancy at birth (LE) has been calculated for states and counties. LE estimates at these levels mask health disparities in local communities. There are no nationwide estimates at the sub-county level. We present a stepwise approach for calculating LE using census tracts in New York state to identify health disparities.

METHODS

Our study included 2751 census tracts in New York state, but excluded New York City. We used population data from the 2010 United States Census and 2008-2010 mortality data from the state health department. Tracts were assigned to 99.97% of the deaths. We removed tracts which had a majority of people living in group quarters. Deaths in these tracts are often recorded elsewhere. Of the remaining 2679 tracts, 6.6% of the tracts had standard errors ≥ 2 years. A geographic aggregation tool was used to aggregate tracts with fewer than 60 deaths, and then aggregate areas that had standard errors of ≥ 2 years.

RESULTS

Aggregation resulted in a 9.9% reduction in the number of areas. Tracts with < 2% of population living below the poverty level had a LE of 82.8 years, while tracts with a poverty level ≥ 25% had a LE of 75.5. We observed differences in LE in border areas, of up to 10.4 years, when excluding or including deaths of study area residents that occurred outside the study area. The range and standard deviation at the county level (77.5-82.8, SD = 1.2 years) were smaller than our final sub-county areas (64.7-92.0, SD = 3.3 years). The correlation between LE and poverty were similar and statistically significant (p < 0.0001) at the county (r = - 0.58) and sub-county level (r = - 0.58). The correlations between LE and percent African-American at the county level were (r = 0.11, p = 0.43) and at the sub-county level (r = - 0.25, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The proposed approach for geocoding and aggregation of mortality and population data provides a solution for health departments to produce stable empirically-derived LE estimates using data coded to the tract. Reliable estimates within sub-county areas are needed to aid public health officials in focusing preventive health programs in areas where health disparities would be masked by county level estimates.

摘要

背景

已计算出各州及各县的出生时预期寿命(LE)。这些层面的LE估计掩盖了当地社区的健康差异。目前尚无全国范围内县级以下地区的估计数据。我们提出一种逐步方法,利用纽约州的普查区来计算LE,以识别健康差异。

方法

我们的研究涵盖纽约州2751个普查区,但不包括纽约市。我们使用了2010年美国人口普查的人口数据以及该州卫生部门2008 - 2010年的死亡率数据。普查区涵盖了99.97%的死亡案例。我们剔除了大多数居民居住在集体宿舍的普查区。这些普查区的死亡案例通常在其他地方记录。在剩余的2679个普查区中,6.6%的普查区标准误差≥2年。使用地理聚合工具对死亡人数少于60人的普查区进行聚合,然后对标准误差≥2年的区域进行聚合。

结果

聚合使区域数量减少了9.9%。贫困率低于2%的普查区LE为82.8岁,而贫困率≥25%的普查区LE为75.5岁。在边境地区,当排除或纳入研究区域外发生的研究区域居民死亡案例时,我们观察到LE差异高达10.4岁。县级层面的范围和标准差(77.5 - 82.8,标准差 = 1.2岁)小于我们最终的县级以下区域(64.7 - 92.0,标准差 = 3.3岁)。LE与贫困之间的相关性在县级(r = -0.58)和县级以下层面(r = -0.58)相似且具有统计学意义(p < 0.0001)。县级层面LE与非裔美国人百分比之间的相关性为(r = 0.11,p = 0.43),县级以下层面为(r = -0.25,p < 0.0001)。

结论

所提出的死亡率和人口数据地理编码及聚合方法为卫生部门提供了一种解决方案,使其能够利用编码到普查区的数据得出稳定的基于经验的LE估计值。需要县级以下地区的可靠估计值,以帮助公共卫生官员将预防性健康项目重点放在那些健康差异会被县级估计值掩盖的地区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4998/5787312/c6da8edda08f/12963_2018_159_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验