Incisional Outcomes of Umbilical vs Suprapubic Mini-laparotomy for Tissue Extraction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes following umbilical minilaparotomy and suprapubic minilaparotomy for tissue extraction.

DESIGN CLASSIFICATION

Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

Two large academic medical centers.

PATIENTS

Women who underwent a minilaparotomy for tissue extraction following a laparoscopic hysterectomy or myomectomy between 2014 and 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

Umbilical or suprapubic minilaparotomy for tissue extraction.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 374 women underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy or myomectomy with minilaparotomy, including 289 (77.3%) with an umbilical minilaparotomy and 85 (22.7%) with a suprapubic minilaparotomy. The 2 groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index, parity, surgical history, procedure type, surgical approach, and surgical indication. The size of the minilaparotomy incision and the specimen weight were significantly smaller in the umbilical minilaparotomy group (mean, 3.3 ± 0.8 cm vs 4.2 ± 0.6 cm [p < .001] and 472.6 ± 357.1 g vs 683.0 ± 475.7 g [p < .001], respectively). Two women in the suprapubic minilaparotomy group sustained a bladder injury during creation of the incision. There were no other complications related to the minilaparotomy in either group. Postoperative outcomes related to the minilaparotomy incision were compiled using the medical record and a follow-up survey. Of the 374 women in this cohort, 163 responded to a detailed survey about their minilaparotomy incision (response rate, 43.5%). With regard to the minilaparotomy, 52.7% of women reported incisional symptoms; 25.9% had increased pain at the incision, 8.3% had an incisional infection, and 2.7% reported an incisional hernia. There was no significant between-group difference in incisional outcomes; however nearly 3 times as many women in the umbilical minilaparotomy group reported concerns about incisional hernia (3.1% vs 1.2%; p = .833). These findings were maintained in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. No patient or procedure characteristics were significantly associated with the development of hernia.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant difference in incisional symptoms, pain, or infection following umbilical minilaparotomy vs a suprapubic minilaparotomy for tissue extraction. Although not statistically significant, the rate of incisional hernia was higher at the umbilical site compared with the suprapubic site.