Suppr超能文献

经微创子宫手术后的剖宫产术技术与小腹腔镜手术比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

C-section technique vs minilaparotomy after minimally invasive uterine surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy.

Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jan;309(1):219-226. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07239-7. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Uterine leiomyomas are benign uterine tumors. The choice of surgical treatment is guided by patient's age, desire to preserve fertility or avoid "radical" surgical interventions such as hysterectomy. In laparotomy, the issue of extracting the fibroid from the cavity does not arise. However, in laparoscopy and robotic surgery, this becomes a challenge. The aim of the present study was to determine the optimal surgical approach for fibroid extraction following laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy in terms of postoperative pain, extraction time, overall surgical time, scar size, and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

A total of 51 patients met the inclusion criteria and were considered in our analysis: 33 patients who had undergone the "ExCITE technique" (Group A), and 18 patients a minilaparotomy procedure (Group B), after either simple myomectomy, multiple myomectomy, supracervical hysterectomy, or total hysterectomy. The diagnosis of myoma was histologically confirmed in all cases.

RESULTS

Regarding the postoperative pain evaluation, at 6 h, patients reported 4 [3-4] vs 6 [5.3-7] on the VAS in Group A and B, as well as at 12 h, 2 [0-2] vs 3.5 [2.3-4] in Group A and B, respectively: both differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference at 24 h from surgery was found. All patients in Group A were satisfied with the ExCITE technique, while in Group B only 67% of them. The length of the hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group A as compared to Group B (p = 0.007). In terms of the operative time for the extraction of the surgical specimen, overall operative time, and the scar size after the surgery, there was a statistically significant difference for those in Group A.

CONCLUSION

The ExCITE technique does not require specific training and allows the surgeon to offer a minimally invasive surgical option for patients, with also an aesthetic result. It is a safe and standardized approach that ensures tissue extraction without the need for mechanical morcellation.

摘要

目的

子宫肌瘤是良性的子宫肿瘤。手术治疗的选择取决于患者的年龄、对生育能力的保留或避免子宫切除术等“根治性”手术干预的愿望。在剖腹手术中,从子宫腔中提取肌瘤的问题不会出现。然而,在腹腔镜和机器人手术中,这成为一个挑战。本研究的目的是确定腹腔镜或机器人子宫肌瘤剔除术后提取肌瘤的最佳手术方法,从术后疼痛、提取时间、总手术时间、疤痕大小和患者满意度方面进行评估。

方法

共有 51 名符合纳入标准的患者纳入我们的分析:33 名接受“ExCITE 技术”的患者(A 组),18 名接受小剖腹手术的患者(B 组),这些患者接受的手术包括单纯子宫肌瘤切除术、多发性子宫肌瘤切除术、次全子宫切除术或全子宫切除术。所有病例均经组织学证实为子宫肌瘤。

结果

在术后疼痛评估方面,在 6 小时时,A 组和 B 组的患者报告的 VAS 评分分别为 4 [3-4] 分和 6 [5.3-7] 分,在 12 小时时,A 组和 B 组的患者报告的 VAS 评分分别为 2 [0-2] 分和 3.5 [2.3-4] 分:这些差异均具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。在术后 24 小时未发现有统计学意义的差异。A 组的所有患者对 ExCITE 技术均满意,而 B 组只有 67%的患者满意。与 B 组相比,A 组的患者住院时间明显缩短(p = 0.007)。在手术标本提取的手术时间、总手术时间和术后疤痕大小方面,A 组具有统计学意义的差异。

结论

ExCITE 技术不需要特定的培训,允许外科医生为患者提供微创手术选择,同时还具有美学效果。这是一种安全和标准化的方法,可确保在无需机械切碎的情况下提取组织。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3438/10769909/662ffc13674f/404_2023_7239_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验