Jager Nadine, Schöpe Jakob, Wagenpfeil Stefan, Bocionek Peter, Saternus Roman, Vogt Thomas, Reichrath Jörg
Center for Clinical and Experimental Photodermatology, The Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany.
Department of Dermatology, The Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany.
Anticancer Res. 2018 Feb;38(2):1165-1171. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12336.
BACKGROUND/AIM: To optimize public health campaigns concerning UV exposure, it is important to characterize factors that influence UV-induced cutaneous vitamin D production. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the impact of different individual and environmental factors including exposed body surface area (BSA), UVB dose and vitamin D status, on serum 25(OH)D concentration.
In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses, and Meta-analysis of Observational studies in Epidemiology guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted (MEDLINE; 01/1960-07/2016) investigating the impact of these factors on vitamin D status after artificial UV exposure as main outcome measure. Summary mean differences [and 95% confidence interval (CI)] were derived from random-effects meta-analysis to account for possible heterogeneity across studies. Meta-regression was conducted to account for impact of UVB dose, baseline 25(OH)D level and BSA.
We identified 15 studies, with an estimated mean 25(OH)D rise per standard erythema dose (SED) of 0.19 nmol/l (95% CI 0.11-0.26 nmol/l). Results from meta-regression suggest a significant impact of UV dose and baseline 25(OH)D concentration on serum 25(OH)D level (p<0.01). Single UVB doses between 0.75 and 3 SED resulted in the highest rise of serum 25(OH)D per dose unit. BSA exposed had a smaller, non-proportional, not significant impact. Partial BSA exposure resulted in relatively higher rise compared to whole-body exposure (e.g. exposure of face and hands caused an 8-fold higher rise of serum 25(OH)D concentration/SED/1% BSA compared to whole-body exposure). Our findings support previous reports, estimating that the half-life of serum 25(OH)D varies depending on different factors.
Our results indicate that partial BSA exposure (e.g. 10%) with moderate UV doses (e.g. 1 SED) is effective in generating or maintaining a healthy vitamin D status. However, due to limitations that include possible confounding factors such as skin type, which could not be considered, these findings should be interpreted with caution.
背景/目的:为优化有关紫外线暴露的公共卫生运动,明确影响紫外线诱导皮肤维生素D生成的因素非常重要。本系统评价和荟萃分析研究了不同个体和环境因素,包括暴露体表面积(BSA)、紫外线B剂量和维生素D状态,对血清25(OH)D浓度的影响。
按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目以及流行病学观察性研究的荟萃分析指南,进行了一项系统文献检索(MEDLINE;1960年1月 - 2016年7月),以这些因素对人工紫外线暴露后维生素D状态的影响作为主要结局指标。汇总平均差[及95%置信区间(CI)]通过随机效应荟萃分析得出,以解释研究间可能存在的异质性。进行了元回归分析以解释紫外线B剂量、基线25(OH)D水平和BSA的影响。
我们确定了15项研究,估计每标准红斑剂量(SED)血清25(OH)D升高0.19 nmol/l(95% CI 0.11 - 0.26 nmol/l)。元回归分析结果表明紫外线剂量和基线25(OH)D浓度对血清25(OH)D水平有显著影响(p<0.01)。0.75至3 SED之间的单次紫外线B剂量导致每剂量单位血清25(OH)D升高最高。暴露的BSA影响较小,呈非比例关系,且不显著。与全身暴露相比,局部BSA暴露导致的升高相对较高(例如,面部和手部暴露导致血清25(OH)D浓度/SED/1% BSA升高是全身暴露的8倍)。我们的研究结果支持先前的报告,即估计血清25(OH)D的半衰期因不同因素而异。
我们的结果表明,中等紫外线剂量(如1 SED)下的局部BSA暴露(如10%)可有效产生或维持健康的维生素D状态。然而,由于存在局限性,包括无法考虑的可能混杂因素如皮肤类型,这些研究结果应谨慎解读。