Misak Cheryl
Perspect Biol Med. 2018;60(3):408-414. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2018.0016.
The argument in this paper is that the position of Schneiderman, Jecker, and Jonsen (2017) suffers from the very flaws of which they accuse the Multiorganization Policy Statement, and that all the ethical and conceptual arguments speak in favor of the collaborative, deliberativist position that underlies the Multiorganization Statement. That position is that we should abandon self-sealing definitions of futility, which disguise the value judgments inherent in them, in favor of the evolving, collaborative process of decision-making.
本文的观点是，施奈德曼、杰克尔和琼森（2017年）的立场存在着他们所指责的多组织政策声明的那些缺陷，而且所有伦理和概念性论据都支持构成多组织声明基础的协作性、审议主义立场。该立场是，我们应该摒弃徒劳性的自我封闭定义，这种定义掩盖了其中固有的价值判断，转而支持不断发展的协作性决策过程。
