Suppr超能文献

解释确定无效性的过程会增加普通公众的接受度。

Explaining the Process of Determining Futility Increases Lay Public Acceptance.

机构信息

1 Department of Internal Medicine.

2 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jun;16(6):738-743. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201811-790OC.

Abstract

National guidelines have laid out a process to conflict resolution in cases of potentially inappropriate medical interventions. To determine the association between information about a process-based approach and lay public perceptions of the appropriateness of withholding medically inappropriate interventions. Respondents from a nationwide sample completed a survey with two adult intensive care unit-based vignettes: one about advanced cancer where doctors told the family that additional chemotherapy would not be offered, and a second case of multiorgan failure after brain hemorrhage where dialysis would not be offered. Participants were randomly assigned to see or not see information about a detailed process for the determination to withhold (second opinion, ethics consultation, exploring transfer to another institution). The primary outcome was the perceived appropriateness of not providing the treatment (four-point scale, dichotomized for analysis, modified Poisson regression), and the secondary outcome was the negative emotional reaction to the case (positive and negative affect schedule, range 1-5, higher is greater negative emotional response, linear regression). A total of 1,191 respondents were included. Providing detailed process information increased the perceived appropriateness of withholding treatment by approximately 10 percentage points in each vignette: (chemotherapy, 75.7-85.4%; dialysis, 68.0-79.3%). Process information remained associated with perceived appropriateness of withholding treatment after adjustment for order effects and prespecified respondent characteristics (chemotherapy: prevalence ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.19) (dialysis: prevalence ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10-1.25). Process information was not associated with emotional response to the cases (chemotherapy: β = -0.04; 95% CI, -0.16 to 0.09) (dialysis: β = -0.02; 95% CI, -0.14 to 0.10; both adjusted for order effects). Providing process-based conflict resolution information increased public acceptance of determinations of medical futility, supporting the practice outlined in national consensus statements.

摘要

国家指南已经制定了一个解决潜在不适当医疗干预冲突的程序。为了确定基于过程的方法信息与普通公众对拒绝提供不适当医疗干预的适当性的看法之间的关联。来自全国范围内的样本的受访者完成了一项调查,调查中有两个成人重症监护病房的案例:一个是关于晚期癌症的案例,医生告诉家人不再提供额外的化疗,另一个是脑出血后多器官衰竭的案例,不提供透析。参与者被随机分配观看或不观看有关决定拒绝提供治疗的详细过程的信息(二次意见、伦理咨询、探索转院)。主要结果是不提供治疗的感知适当性(四点量表,二分法分析,修正泊松回归),次要结果是对病例的负面情绪反应(积极和消极情感量表,范围 1-5,越高表示负面情绪反应越大,线性回归)。共有 1191 名受访者。在每个案例中,提供详细的过程信息使拒绝提供治疗的感知适当性增加了约 10 个百分点:(化疗,75.7-85.4%;透析,68.0-79.3%)。在调整了顺序效应和预设受访者特征后,过程信息仍然与拒绝提供治疗的感知适当性相关(化疗:患病率比,1.13;95%置信区间[CI],1.07-1.19)(透析:患病率比,1.17;95% CI,1.10-1.25)。过程信息与对病例的情绪反应无关(化疗:β=-0.04;95% CI,-0.16 至 0.09)(透析:β=-0.02;95% CI,-0.14 至 0.10;均调整了顺序效应)。提供基于过程的冲突解决信息增加了公众对医疗无效性决定的接受程度,支持了国家共识声明中概述的做法。

相似文献

1
Explaining the Process of Determining Futility Increases Lay Public Acceptance.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jun;16(6):738-743. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201811-790OC.
2
Futility: unilateral decision making is not the default for pediatric intensivists.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep;13(5):e311-5. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31824ea12c.
3
Experts' attitudes towards medical futility: an empirical survey from Japan.
BMC Med Ethics. 2006 Jun 10;7:E8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-7-8.
4
Rituals, death and the moral practice of medical futility.
Nurs Ethics. 2009 May;16(3):292-302. doi: 10.1177/0969733009102691.
5
Unilateral do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders and ethics consultation: a case series.
Crit Care Med. 1999 Jun;27(6):1116-20. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199906000-00031.
6
An evolutionary concept analysis of futility in health care.
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Jun;74(6):1289-1300. doi: 10.1111/jan.13526. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
7
Medical Futility in Concept, Culture, and Practice.
J Clin Ethics. 2018 Summer;29(2):114-23.
8
Medical futility procedures: what more do we need to know?
Chest. 2013 Nov;144(5):1707-1711. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-1240.
10
Beyond the futility argument: the fair process approach and time-limited trials for managing dialysis conflict.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Nov;8(11):2000-6. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12191212. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

2
The Community Perspective on Potentially Inappropriate Treatment.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Jul;17(7):854-859. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201912-890OC.
3
Placing Value on End-of-Life Care-Is It Time for a New Taxonomy?
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1914466. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14466.

本文引用的文献

1
Criterialism versus Deliberativism.
Perspect Biol Med. 2018;60(3):408-414. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2018.0016.
2
The Abuse of Futility.
Perspect Biol Med. 2018;60(3):295-313. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2018.0001.
4
Variability in physician prognosis and recommendations after intracerebral hemorrhage.
Neurology. 2016 May 17;86(20):1864-71. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002676. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
5
Medically Inappropriate or Futile Treatment: Deliberation and Justification.
J Med Philos. 2016 Feb;41(1):90-114. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhv035. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
7
The ethics of forgoing life-sustaining treatment: theoretical considerations and clinical decision making.
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2014 Mar 11;9(1):14. doi: 10.1186/2049-6958-9-14.
8
Futile treatments in intensive care units.
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Nov 11;173(20):1894-5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.7098.
9
Surrogate expectations in severe brain injury.
Brain Inj. 2013;27(10):1141-7. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.804201. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
10
Beyond the futility argument: the fair process approach and time-limited trials for managing dialysis conflict.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Nov;8(11):2000-6. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12191212. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验