Liu Tongran, Xiao Tong, Shi Jiannong
CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jan 9;11:657. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00657. eCollection 2017.
Response inhibition and conflict control on affective information can be regarded as two important emotion regulation and cognitive control processes. The emotional Go/Nogo flanker paradigm was adopted and participant's event-related potentials (ERPs) were analyzed to investigate how response inhibition and conflict control interplayed. The behavioral findings revealed that participants showed higher accuracy to identify happy faces in congruent condition relative to that in incongruent condition. The electrophysiological results manifested that response inhibition and conflict control interplayed during the detection/conflict monitoring stage, and Nogo-N2 was more negative in the incongruent trials than the congruent trials. With regard to the inhibitory control/conflict resolution stage, Nogo responses induced greater frontal P3 and parietal P3 responses than Go responses did. The difference waveforms of N2 and parietal P3 showed that response inhibition and conflict control had distinct processes, and the multiple responses requiring both conflict control and response inhibition processes induced stronger monitoring and resolution processes than conflict control. The current study manifested that response inhibition and conflict control on emotional information required separable neural mechanisms during emotion regulation processes.
对情感信息的反应抑制和冲突控制可被视为两个重要的情绪调节和认知控制过程。采用情绪Go/Nogo侧翼范式,并分析参与者的事件相关电位(ERP),以研究反应抑制和冲突控制是如何相互作用的。行为学研究结果表明,与不一致条件相比,参与者在一致条件下识别快乐面孔的准确率更高。电生理学结果表明,反应抑制和冲突控制在检测/冲突监测阶段相互作用,并且在不一致试验中Nogo-N2比一致试验中更负。关于抑制控制/冲突解决阶段,Nogo反应比Go反应诱发更大的额叶P3和顶叶P3反应。N2和顶叶P3的差异波形表明,反应抑制和冲突控制有不同的过程,并且需要冲突控制和反应抑制过程的多种反应比冲突控制诱发更强的监测和解决过程。当前研究表明,在情绪调节过程中,对情绪信息的反应抑制和冲突控制需要可分离的神经机制。